Chubbs
 Offline
Posts: 10517
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 15:01:53 » |
|
situations change Gaz, didnt Fitton also say he would be looking at signing younger players than Parkin for Swindon? Nalis  uhhh marshall, Casal? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33892
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #31 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 15:02:15 » |
|
as far as I know Fitton doesnt decide who to sign anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JPC82
|
|
« Reply #32 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 15:19:13 » |
|
as far as I know Fitton doesnt decide who to sign anyway.
so that rubbishes gazzas philosphy of the parkin move then |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
STFC_Gazzza
|
|
« Reply #33 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 15:29:36 » |
|
so that rubbishes gazzas philosphy of the parkin move then
Yes however Fitton would have to pay the fee so in essence no it doesn't. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JPC82
|
|
« Reply #34 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 15:31:29 » |
|
if the chairman gets too involved and does not back the managers judgement u get a very unhappy manager like Rafa cos of the Gareth Barry saga
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC4LIFE
Fence Fucker
Offline
Posts: 2785
|
|
« Reply #35 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 15:34:12 » |
|
So who exactly made this phone call? What was said, and what will come from it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33892
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #36 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 15:37:11 » |
|
Yes however Fitton would have to pay the fee so in essence no it doesn't.
Its Maplas team, if he wants Sam Parkin then we should try and get him. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #37 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 15:38:10 » |
|
Personally I think it would be a total disaster to bring Sam back.
never go back kids!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 26780
|
|
« Reply #38 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 17:35:43 » |
|
Exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Panda Paws
|
|
« Reply #39 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 17:46:04 » |
|
A 6 month loan deal, with Blair going the other way, would be immense, if he stays fit and scores goals then make it permanent in January. Him and Cox would be good, and he seems to be in some form.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #40 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 17:50:46 » |
|
A loan deal would be a very good option.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
michael
The Dude Abides
Offline
Posts: 3237
|
|
« Reply #41 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 17:52:41 » |
|
Is Sam Parkin's name going to come up every time we lose a game?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JPC82
|
|
« Reply #42 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 17:59:59 » |
|
Is Sam Parkin's name going to come up every time we lose a game?
yes |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #43 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 18:21:36 » |
|
has nothing to with with yesterdays result.more to do with him scoring shit loads of goals for us, and now playing in the basement league for a team on -30 points.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15614
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
|
« Reply #44 on: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 20:13:33 » |
|
Personally I think it would be a total disaster to bring Sam back.
never go back kids!
Spot on yeovil. Yes he scored a load of goals for us, but that was in the past. If he was still good, he wouldn't be in league. Do we want an injury prone striker? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
|
