|
JPC82
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 20:45:13 » |
|
if it was 100k id snap up Fleetwood, Fleetwood has scored more goals this season than Blair has in his whole career :shock:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
 Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 20:46:36 » |
|
sam parkin please
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16467
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 20:47:00 » |
|
blair hasn't played non league football
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
|
JPC82
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 20:47:56 » |
|
sam parkin please id have Parkin back aswell, but refering to my previous post Malpas like the big man/small man combo, so Parkin would be a replacement for Corr or Paynter, whilst Fleetwood would be a replacement for Blair |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 20:50:11 » |
|
does he like the big man-small man combo?
i aint heard that
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JPC82
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 20:53:14 » |
|
does he like the big man-small man combo?
i aint heard that he has been quaoted as saying before when he has Corr playing that he would would love to have 4 or 5 barry corrs in the team due to the height, and he always plays Cox, and when Corr was injured he put Peacock up top as he said again to complement Cox he needs a big man |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 20:55:55 » |
|
fair comments.cox is no1 choice for sure. and because he aint gonna win headers physical battles etc, i see what you are saying.
but sammy p or fleetwood? i know who i'd take, and who would be my no1 striker.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16467
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 20:57:57 » |
|
i really dont see why we're not in the running for parkin. A proven goalscorer, cheap, loves it here, fans favourite, help the 6000 push. i can't see the logic in not signing him
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
|
JPC82
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 20:58:09 » |
|
fair comments.cox is no1 choice for sure. and because he aint gonna win headers physical battles etc, i see what you are saying.
but sammy p or fleetwood? i know who i'd take, and who would be my no1 striker. yeah out of those two i would choose Parkin because of the aerial threat, but id be delighted with 4 forwards Corr Paynter Cox Fleetwood. in a perfect world it would be Parkin instead of Corr |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16467
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 20:59:02 » |
|
fair comments.cox is no1 choice for sure. and because he aint gonna win headers physical battles etc, i see what you are saying.
but sammy p or fleetwood? i know who i'd take, and who would be my no1 striker. yeah out of those two i would choose Parkin because of the aerial threat, but id be delighted with 4 forwards Corr Paynter Cox Fleetwood. in a perfect world it would be Parkin instead of Corr no in an ideal wolrd it would be parkin instead of fleetwood mac |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 20:59:58 » |
|
i really dont see why we're not in the running for parkin. A proven goalscorer, cheap, loves it here, fans favourite, help the 6000 push. i can't see the logic in not signing him the only reasons i can think of are if he isn't completely over his injuries,or his wage demands. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
JPC82
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 21:03:29 » |
|
fair comments.cox is no1 choice for sure. and because he aint gonna win headers physical battles etc, i see what you are saying.
but sammy p or fleetwood? i know who i'd take, and who would be my no1 striker. yeah out of those two i would choose Parkin because of the aerial threat, but id be delighted with 4 forwards Corr Paynter Cox Fleetwood. in a perfect world it would be Parkin instead of Corr what if cox gets injured? we have no pace up top, paynter corr sturrock and parkin :? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16467
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 21:04:50 » |
|
cox is hardly speedy gonzalez is he? not much different to paynter
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
|
JPC82
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 21:05:47 » |
|
cox is hardly speedy gonzalez is he? not much different to paynter hes the quickest we have, and yes he is quicker than Paynter |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Monday, May 26, 2008, 21:05:59 » |
|
remember the other strikers who played with sam?not the quickest
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
