In todays Adver he has said that Malpas would prefer him to play up front as he wants better ball players(which is fair enough) yet peacock would prefer to play midfeld(again fair enough).
Now in my opinion he is not good enough as a striker and Malpas does not rate him as a midfielder so if that is the case could someone explain why we are offering him a new contract
:?
because Malpas doesnt have a clue!
I'd start Paynter upfront ahead of Peacock!