|
lebowski
|
 |
« Reply #90 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 19:51:40 » |
|
a goalkeeper should know where to parry a ball that he cannot hold on to.
would you agree?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jim
 Offline
Posts: 758
|
|
« Reply #91 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 20:01:37 » |
|
a goalkeeper should know where to parry a ball that he cannot hold on to.
would you agree? Dear me. I was really reacting to your OTT initial post. If every one in every situation did their job to the absolute we would have a stalemate. I guess tthe thing we should ask is that players mitigate the risk by clearing the ball when thats the obvious thing to do rather than taking unnecessary risks which lead to undesired outcomes (that means a goal in this instance). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lebowski
|
|
« Reply #92 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 20:08:11 » |
|
so we agree then.
thank god.
good result eh jim?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #93 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 20:08:26 » |
|
Whilst the goal was undoubtedly Comminges fault for failure to nip the situation in the bud, however I can't help feeling Brez wull look at the goal and feel he should have done a little better, I don't think it was that well hit. Similarly there was a few times toady when i thought Brez could have caught crosses and chose to parry, we got away with it today, however it seems to fall to a man on the edge ofthe box far too often, and eventually we'll get punished. Not that its any reason to drop or sell him.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jim
Offline
Posts: 758
|
|
« Reply #94 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 20:13:23 » |
|
so we agree then.
thank god.
good result eh jim? Do you mean that the good result is that we agree or that we drew. I think if Comminges had cleared the ball we would have won  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lebowski
|
|
« Reply #95 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 20:15:01 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jim
Offline
Posts: 758
|
|
« Reply #96 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 20:15:29 » |
|
Bottom line then Jim, it was a defensive fuck up? Typically succinct - it was just unnecessary. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33888
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #97 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 20:32:35 » |
|
Maybe Brez could have done better, but for starters as its been said the ball shouldnt have even made it into the box and secondly why was there two Walsall players standing in the 6 yard box both waiting to tap it in without a black shirt anywhere near them....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #98 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 20:33:40 » |
|
in summary, sell them both.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #99 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 20:34:22 » |
|
I think we should sell all our players whenever they make a mistake. Or even if they didn't
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
|
« Reply #100 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 20:43:08 » |
|
How much would we get for Fitton?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dell boy
|
|
« Reply #101 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 21:15:56 » |
|
Bottom line then Jim, it was a defensive fuck up? Typically succinct - it was just unnecessary. I bet you're a bundle of laughs to have a pint with?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jim
Offline
Posts: 758
|
|
« Reply #102 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 21:25:02 » |
|
Bottom line then Jim, it was a defensive fuck up? Typically succinct - it was just unnecessary. I bet you're a bundle of laughs to have a pint with? Not sure I get your point - I agreed with you and congratulated you on your brevity. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dell boy
|
|
« Reply #103 on: Saturday, January 12, 2008, 21:27:01 » |
|
Bottom line then Jim, it was a defensive fuck up? Typically succinct - it was just unnecessary. I bet you're a bundle of laughs to have a pint with? Not sure I get your point - I agreed with you and congratulated you on your brevity. My mistake, just looked up the wod succinct, bit of a thicko you see.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #104 on: Sunday, January 13, 2008, 00:07:38 » |
|
Bottom line then Jim, it was a defensive fuck up? Typically succinct - it was just unnecessary. I bet you're a bundle of laughs to have a pint with? BACK OFF MAN! jim's a legend. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
