Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: If our players are so good why do we get shit transfer fees?  (Read 3950 times)
Reeves for King

Offline Offline

Posts: 751




Ignore
« on: Saturday, December 22, 2007, 00:36:50 »

Tozer is £250,000 up front, only 'could' rise to £1.1m. Jutkiweicz was something similar I think. Couldn't we demand some more as we didn't really need to sell them?
Logged

here's the man himself when you need him?
janaage
People's Front of Alba

Offline Offline

Posts: 14825





Ignore
« Reply #1 on: Saturday, December 22, 2007, 09:57:51 »

Come on fella, the lad's onlt got about 180 minutes worth of league experience.  £250,000 is a good price!!  Same for Lukas, half a season of league 2 footie and a transfer fee of a mill.  Not bad business.
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #2 on: Saturday, December 22, 2007, 09:59:53 »

Fucking hell. What do you mean more money? THis isn't Champ Manager 97/98. We're fucking lucky to get that much.

Oh wait. Jan just said the same thing. I love you Jan.
Logged
janaage
People's Front of Alba

Offline Offline

Posts: 14825





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Saturday, December 22, 2007, 15:30:54 »

It's mutual Benny!!
Logged
Peter Venkman
Past glories motivate us when times are bleak.

Offline Offline

Posts: 64664


Perfection is not attainable



« Reply #4 on: Saturday, December 22, 2007, 17:05:58 »

The BBC reported earlier in the week that Tozer had actually left us for a nominal fee but with it rising to £1.1 million, not sure if they said £250k was nominal but there was a mention of just over £100k.
Logged

From the station at Colchester
To the cells of Warrington
From the services at Leicester
To the slums of Northampton

We travel over England
And one day Europe too

Cos we all follow the Swindon
We're the famous Town End crew.
Barry Scott

Offline Offline

Posts: 9134




« Reply #5 on: Sunday, December 23, 2007, 11:26:40 »

If Tozer went for 50p we made a profit. We only had the kid for about a year and stole him from Plymouth, which everyone seems to forget, so whatever we get it's still money for nothing.

I didn't rate him anyway and in the grand scheme of things any of the figures banded about are pretty good baring in mind both his experience and our expenditure.
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21305





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Sunday, December 23, 2007, 14:46:11 »

both the fees for tozer and jukebox seem very reasonable to me.i find it rather amusing, as many fans slated tozer but had prem clubs queing up to sign him.
Logged
suttonred

Offline Offline

Posts: 12510





Ignore
« Reply #7 on: Sunday, December 23, 2007, 14:48:28 »

Has he actually gone? I haven't seen anything confirming it
Logged
JPC82

« Reply #8 on: Monday, December 24, 2007, 00:14:07 »

Quote from: "suttonred"
Has he actually gone? I haven't seen anything confirming it


newcastle site says personal terms are being discussed, although a certain member of STFC coaching staff has told me that Tozer will be on between £4,000-£6,000 a week basic. Which is ridiculous, Jutkiewicz is on £2,000 a week basic but get extra for starting in reserve games and scoring in reserve games
Logged
reeves4england

Offline Offline

Posts: 16121


We'll never die!




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Monday, December 24, 2007, 00:17:12 »

The point is our players AREN'T so good.
Logged
JPC82

« Reply #10 on: Monday, December 24, 2007, 00:21:31 »

Quote from: "reeves4england"
The point is our players AREN'T so good.


i agree the Jutkiewicz deal is a fair price i think, the Tozer deal we have been lucky to get the amount we have, i have seen him play more than anyone on here, seen all the home youth games (even the ones at the end of last season when he played a few games for us before we officially signed him) and all the 1st team games hes played with the exception of Carlisle, and he isnt as good as the fee suggests. The 1 game where i could sasy he stood out above the rest of the defence was the youth cup game against Barnsley, and he wasnt the best player in that game, Kurt Hammond was immense
Logged
Spencer_White

« Reply #11 on: Monday, December 24, 2007, 10:37:16 »

Quote from: "Reeves for King"
Tozer is £250,000 up front, only 'could' rise to £1.1m. Jutkiweicz was something similar I think. Couldn't we demand some more as we didn't really need to sell them?


What the fuck are you on about?Huh?

 :|
Logged
SwindonTartanArmy
Go Team GB!

Offline Offline

Posts: 2917


London Scottish - More History than Franchise!


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #12 on: Monday, December 24, 2007, 10:45:14 »

The point is people, the clubs are paying for potential. If Tozer or Jukie were mid 20s we would have got less than £100,000 in total for each of them. FWIW Tozer and Jukie have bags of potential. Its now up to Everton and Newcastle to continue their development. FFS Tozer isnt old enough to drink yet! A few months in the gym bulking up and some good coaching he could turn out ot be a beast of a defender!
Logged

Vi er best i verden! Vi er best i verden! Vi har slått England 2-1 i fotball!! Det er aldeles utrolig! Vi har slått England! England, kjempers fødeland. Lord Nelson, Lord Beaverbrook, Sir Winston Churchill, Sir Anthony Eden, Clement Attlee, Henry Cooper, Lady Diana--vi har slått dem alle sammen. Vi har slått dem alle sammen. Maggie Thatcher can you hear me?
Your boys took a hell of a beating!"
JPC82

« Reply #13 on: Monday, December 24, 2007, 10:55:20 »

Quote from: "SwindonTartanArmy"
The point is people, the clubs are paying for potential. If Tozer or Jukie were mid 20s we would have got less than £100,000 in total for each of them. FWIW Tozer and Jukie have bags of potential. Its now up to Everton and Newcastle to continue their development. FFS Tozer isnt old enough to drink yet! A few months in the gym bulking up and some good coaching he could turn out ot be a beast of a defender!


spot on mate
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21305





Ignore
« Reply #14 on: Monday, December 24, 2007, 11:01:04 »

tozer has the touch and physique already.he just needs games to further his development
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
Print
Jump to: