Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Holt: We have insufficient Funds To Continue Trading  (Read 10277 times)
magicroundabout
Fanta Pants

Offline Offline

Posts: 8805




Ignore
« Reply #15 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:28:30 »

a total boycot of the game would be good and all those people who would have attended to demonstraight from outside the ground.

or if people are adament to attend the game then everyone should protest by turning there back on the current board of directors before kick off.

followed by 90mins of singing for every single town player there. no anti board chants just full support for the team.
then after 90mins unleash hell at the cunts
Logged

OneAndrewFitton

« Reply #16 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:29:27 »

A boycott is definitley required for the next game (if there is one)

Android won't fail the CVA, he's too bummy with diamond mike.

I hope the HMRC issue a winding up order now.
Logged
Tails

Offline Offline

Posts: 10221


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #17 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:29:27 »

Is it worth a fans united day? Brighton had one, so to have one against Brighton would be quite a good idea IMO.
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21305





Ignore
« Reply #18 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:30:13 »

can the trust set the wheels in motion for the town to come together and march?Huh?
and a boycott i would support.the team will go nowhere anyway this season with the embargo in place. so it wont do any harm imo
Logged
kevjoycreed

« Reply #19 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:30:31 »

Quote from: "Tails"
Is it worth a fans united day? Brighton had one, so to have one against Brighton would be quite a good idea IMO.


They might even support us with it.
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 12356




Ignore
« Reply #20 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:30:56 »

Quote from: "magicroundabout"
a total boycot of the game would be good and all those people who would have attended to demonstraight from outside the ground.

or if people are adament to attend the game then everyone should protest by turning there back on the current board of directors before kick off.

followed by 90mins of singing for every single town player there. no anti board chants just full support for the team.
then after 90mins unleash hell at the cunts


If they don't give a shit about millions of pounds of debts being enforced any minute now, then a few people turning their backs on the seats where the Board would have normally been sat isn't going to have the slightest impact on them.

It's nasty or not at all - direct action or boycott.  Anything else just perpetuates their reign by providing short term cashflow.
Logged
OneAndrewFitton

« Reply #21 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:31:45 »

I think it does need to get nasty now to have any effect, protests etc don't bother them.
Logged
Phil_S

Offline Offline

Posts: 1534


Who changed my Avatar ?!




Ignore
« Reply #22 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:31:50 »

Quote from: "Tails"
Is it worth a fans united day? Brighton had one, so to have one against Brighton would be quite a good idea IMO.


Im fairly sure that Brighton fans would support it. But would all of our fans.
(I apologise for saying this, but I really am hacked off)
Logged

From the Dark Side
Foggy

Offline Offline

Posts: 1948

Ketchup wanker




Ignore
« Reply #23 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:33:57 »

I can understand people wanting to protest but what will it achieve? Its obvious that the current board dont give a flying fuck about the fans or the club so why would they bother about a protest? The way to hit them is in the pocket and that means a total boycotting of all home games .
Logged

Sad to say, i must be on my way
kevjoycreed

« Reply #24 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:34:13 »

Quote from: "arriba"
can the trust set the wheels in motion for the town to come together and march?Huh?


I doubt they will bother. All they seem happy to do is stand and sing behind the Arkells.
Logged
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick

Offline Offline

Posts: 16470





Ignore
« Reply #25 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:34:13 »

how long does it take from a wup being ordered to a company being closed down?
Logged

Things get better but they never get good
OneAndrewFitton

« Reply #26 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:34:18 »

The loyal board arse lickers will just carry on as normal no doubt, How blind are some people.
Logged
redbullzeye

Offline Offline

Posts: 1319





Ignore
« Reply #27 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:35:18 »

FWIW Fitton was asked what the likely outcome for the club would be now the deal has collapsed, to which he gave 2 scenario's.  Firstly they would struggle on with Wills finding the cash to pay the weekly running costs.  Secondly the club would be declared bankrupt. He stated that someone would pick the club up if it were declared bankrupt as none of the impediments that stalled his bid would apply (I'm not totally sure what this means) Obviously this would mean losing points as Luton have.  There was no mention of us not being allowed to go into administration again as we've been there twice.
Logged
tans
You spin me right round baby right round

Online Online

Posts: 26924





Ignore
« Reply #28 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:35:33 »

Quote from: "STFC dave"
how long does it take from a wup being ordered to a company being closed down?


It depends i think
Logged
OneAndrewFitton

« Reply #29 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:36:23 »

Surely a points deduction is forthcoming......
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6   Go Up
Print
Jump to: