magicroundabout
Fanta Pants
Offline
Posts: 8805
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:28:30 » |
|
a total boycot of the game would be good and all those people who would have attended to demonstraight from outside the ground.
or if people are adament to attend the game then everyone should protest by turning there back on the current board of directors before kick off.
followed by 90mins of singing for every single town player there. no anti board chants just full support for the team. then after 90mins unleash hell at the cunts
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OneAndrewFitton
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:29:27 » |
|
A boycott is definitley required for the next game (if there is one)
Android won't fail the CVA, he's too bummy with diamond mike.
I hope the HMRC issue a winding up order now.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10221
Git facked
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:29:27 » |
|
Is it worth a fans united day? Brighton had one, so to have one against Brighton would be quite a good idea IMO.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:30:13 » |
|
can the trust set the wheels in motion for the town to come together and march?  and a boycott i would support.the team will go nowhere anyway this season with the embargo in place. so it wont do any harm imo
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kevjoycreed
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:30:31 » |
|
Is it worth a fans united day? Brighton had one, so to have one against Brighton would be quite a good idea IMO. They might even support us with it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12356
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:30:56 » |
|
a total boycot of the game would be good and all those people who would have attended to demonstraight from outside the ground.
or if people are adament to attend the game then everyone should protest by turning there back on the current board of directors before kick off.
followed by 90mins of singing for every single town player there. no anti board chants just full support for the team. then after 90mins unleash hell at the cunts If they don't give a shit about millions of pounds of debts being enforced any minute now, then a few people turning their backs on the seats where the Board would have normally been sat isn't going to have the slightest impact on them. It's nasty or not at all - direct action or boycott. Anything else just perpetuates their reign by providing short term cashflow.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OneAndrewFitton
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:31:45 » |
|
I think it does need to get nasty now to have any effect, protests etc don't bother them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Phil_S
Offline
Posts: 1534
Who changed my Avatar ?!
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:31:50 » |
|
Is it worth a fans united day? Brighton had one, so to have one against Brighton would be quite a good idea IMO. Im fairly sure that Brighton fans would support it. But would all of our fans. (I apologise for saying this, but I really am hacked off)
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the Dark Side
|
|
|
Foggy
Offline
Posts: 1948
Ketchup wanker
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:33:57 » |
|
I can understand people wanting to protest but what will it achieve? Its obvious that the current board dont give a flying fuck about the fans or the club so why would they bother about a protest? The way to hit them is in the pocket and that means a total boycotting of all home games .
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sad to say, i must be on my way
|
|
|
kevjoycreed
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:34:13 » |
|
can the trust set the wheels in motion for the town to come together and march? I doubt they will bother. All they seem happy to do is stand and sing behind the Arkells.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16470
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:34:13 » |
|
how long does it take from a wup being ordered to a company being closed down?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
OneAndrewFitton
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:34:18 » |
|
The loyal board arse lickers will just carry on as normal no doubt, How blind are some people.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
redbullzeye
Offline
Posts: 1319
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:35:18 » |
|
FWIW Fitton was asked what the likely outcome for the club would be now the deal has collapsed, to which he gave 2 scenario's. Firstly they would struggle on with Wills finding the cash to pay the weekly running costs. Secondly the club would be declared bankrupt. He stated that someone would pick the club up if it were declared bankrupt as none of the impediments that stalled his bid would apply (I'm not totally sure what this means) Obviously this would mean losing points as Luton have. There was no mention of us not being allowed to go into administration again as we've been there twice.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 26924
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:35:33 » |
|
how long does it take from a wup being ordered to a company being closed down? It depends i think
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OneAndrewFitton
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 16:36:23 » |
|
Surely a points deduction is forthcoming......
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|