|
sonic youth
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:09:35 » |
|
no swearwords on those banners, gerald. not that mex or yeovil had anything to do with the banners - which is irrelevent because they were banned as a result of the cheltenham game, where there were no banners at all. everyone at the protest after the cheltenham game was swearing. as is commonplace at football matches, especially when a few hundred people are extremely angry. the club cannot prove that yeovil specifically was swearing, so how is it fair to ban him? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald Phillips
|
|
« Reply #61 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:11:26 » |
|
Nice avatar Ronnie . The club say then . Yeovil and Mex swore and showed in approprite words on banners . Am i right there . That is what the club say .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
 Online
Posts: 57752
|
|
« Reply #62 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:11:56 » |
|
Is someone on a mega wind-up pretending to be Gerald?
:? No, Gerald really is that special (as in Olympics). :| |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
 Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #63 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:12:11 » |
|
me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald Phillips
|
|
« Reply #64 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:12:45 » |
|
the club cannot prove that yeovil specifically was swearing, so how is it fair to ban him?
I agree so why not fight the ban then ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #65 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:13:03 » |
|
Is someone on a mega wind-up pretending to be Gerald?
:? Got no idea...but it's certainly livened up a Sunday night...even though Top Gear was top notch. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #67 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:13:50 » |
|
the club cannot prove that yeovil specifically was swearing, so how is it fair to ban him?
I agree so why not fight the ban then ? no its not fair.and no need to fight it, as he can go to games |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bushey Boy
Offline
Posts: 8351
|
|
« Reply #68 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:14:12 » |
|
the club cannot prove that yeovil specifically was swearing, so how is it fair to ban him?
I agree so why not fight the ban then ? The ban is no longer in place. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald Phillips
|
|
« Reply #69 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:15:26 » |
|
He should fight it if its not true .
Its not nice being called a leech or a liar . Or is it ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #70 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:15:53 » |
|
the club cannot prove that yeovil specifically was swearing, so how is it fair to ban him?
I agree so why not fight the ban then ? they're not banned anymore, gerald. they've been asked not to go in the arkells but not banned from the ground or any stands. what is there to fight? mex stood down from the trust board because of his health. he's hardly going to waste his time trying to fight a legal battle. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald Phillips
|
|
« Reply #71 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:16:30 » |
|
the club cannot prove that yeovil specifically was swearing, so how is it fair to ban him?
I agree so why not fight the ban then ? The ban is no longer in place. In the Arkells it is . Isnt it . |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #72 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:16:38 » |
|
the club cannot prove that yeovil specifically was swearing, so how is it fair to ban him?
I agree so why not fight the ban then ? The ban is no longer in place. Couldn't the club just ban Stilton instead.....as he doesn't go anyway it would make no difference to him, buit would make some of us happy.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald Phillips
|
|
« Reply #73 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:18:03 » |
|
I agree Mex is unwell he doesnt need the aggro ( i agree) but Yeovil could fight it couldnt he . If hes right he should fight it or they will do it again .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
|
« Reply #74 on: Sunday, November 4, 2007, 22:19:50 » |
|
He should fight it if its not true .
Its not nice being called a leech or a liar . Or is it ? It's a lovely term of affection. This has got to be a wind up. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
