Hopefully Diamond Mike will do as sterling as job with his interview, as he did at Christmas, when he contradicted himself so many times.
Good post
I listened again to the christmas 06 interview with Diamandis last weekend. I reckon a professional speech analyst would have a fucking field day listening to the changes in his tone, inflection, and hesitancy. He did contradict himself several times and even managed one or two howling faux pars which no one picked up on at the time, eg; )
'in principal we’ve started to disguise the parameters … to discuss the parameters of how negotiation could take place' I appreciate that I'm as biased as the next cunt, but that fucker has one hell of a range of vocal ability. Seriously, he wouldn't be out of place at a RADA speech lecture. One minute he's Mr nice guy, the sort of bloke who'd be pleasantly engaging on a quiet night down the pub. Next minute, he's developed a cockney accent with a bit of menace to it. Then he changes again, this time though he's a financial guru, chucking out cliched quotes and unfathomable figures that could be pure shit or accurate if anyone could be fucking arsed to check. Then he's playing the confused 'please forgive me for not knowing all the answers, I'm just an ordinary fucking bloke' role.
Whilst his speech delivery is of fucking masterclass standards, he can't disguise his emotions. He's right fucking narky about personal comments;
What is going on in the character assassination of myself and my board...If that interview is anything to go by he'll have it all scripted in a similar way for the Advertiser.
The trust reps seem to be a real thorn in his head, so no doubt they'll get attention. As will the likes of Bill Power, Mark Devlin, the council bloke Nick Martin, Mike Wilks, Best holdings, Jim Little and his portugese mates etc etc.
Obviously anyone who does not swallow his questionable leadership and propoganda must therefore be a cunt and is deserving of being dissed by him.
