Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
 Offline
Posts: 16467
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday, October 9, 2007, 10:25:23 » |
|
Actually if we want it more public, then perhaps the Trust should get right behind this. Exactly! If we stop being hush hush about it, and get it out in the open, it will be a lot more likely to succeed. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
|
TalkTalk
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday, October 9, 2007, 10:26:09 » |
|
Actually if we want it more public, then perhaps the Trust should get right behind this. The Trust have no mandate to organise protests, remember? I seem to recall that it would take another members' meeting to sanction it. Fuck that. I'm protesting tonight, Trust board member or not. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Panda Paws
Offline
Posts: 2170
Arse
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday, October 9, 2007, 10:26:10 » |
|
Any volunteers, by the way? I think us TUMDFCers should take this one. TBH I just checked there and there doesn't seem much going down. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday, October 9, 2007, 10:32:53 » |
|
It shouldn't be sorted out on there as its not accessible to everyone like this site is.
This site and the adver site are the main two ways to unite the fans.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday, October 9, 2007, 10:55:55 » |
|
why not congregate outside the arkells pre match so everyone in whatever stand can vocally protest as one.then the same after the game?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday, October 9, 2007, 10:58:32 » |
|
why not congregate outside the arkells pre match so everyone in whatever stand can vocally protest as one.then the same after the game? There's only so much drinking time that you can cut into before people start reassessing their priorities. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday, October 9, 2007, 10:59:29 » |
|
Ben, we're starting nearly 6 hours before the game - i think it'll be ok.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday, October 9, 2007, 11:31:08 » |
|
Actually if we want it more public, then perhaps the Trust should get right behind this. The problem is that we need to act on the decision of our members and that can only be done through a democratic vote process and then a clear mandate is issued. The trust board cannot sanction protests until that process has been gone through or we would be acting outside of our constitution. However, from a PERSONAL point of view as a FAN I will be in attendance of any protest that is organised |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Phil_S
Offline
Posts: 1534
Who changed my Avatar ?!
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday, October 9, 2007, 14:56:46 » |
|
Didn't we give the TRUST board a mandate at the last meeting to take any action they deemed neccesary, or was that at a previous meeting ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
From the Dark Side
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday, October 9, 2007, 15:03:36 » |
|
Didn't we give the TRUST board a mandate at the last meeting to take any action they deemed neccesary, or was that at a previous meeting ? That was last season Phil so falls outside or the remit unfortunately |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Tuesday, October 9, 2007, 15:04:34 » |
|
No offence to the Trust board but I think this protest is better without Trust backing.So far if this message board is anything to go by then the strength of feeling alone is enough to carry this off without having to put things to votes,etc.Trust involvement meens dilly dallying about and democratic bull shit, not to mention the calls of conflict of interests from the doubters.This really needs to stay more grass routes if it is to be effective.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday, October 9, 2007, 15:07:12 » |
|
No offence to the Trust board but I think this protest is better without Trust backing.So far if this message board is anything to go by then the strength of feeling alone is enough to carry this off without having to put things to votes,etc.Trust involvement meens dilly dallying about and democratic bull shit, not to mention the calls of conflict of interests from the doubters.This really needs to stay more grass routes if it is to be effective. Agreed This is not political Its about the fucking survival of 125 (?) years of footballing heritage |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
