Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
 Offline
Posts: 36334
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 10:19:59 » |
|
That assumes that the current owners and GM are not doing the same to the Jim Little Consortium as they did to the Fans Consortium.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
STFC_Gazzza
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 10:34:50 » |
|
That assumes that the current owners and GM are not doing the same to the Jim Little Consortium as they did to the Fans Consortium. Doubt it, the current board actually acknowledge that Jim Littles consortium exist. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 11:00:42 » |
|
Yes, that makes it highly improbable.
The point stands - we don't know who is playing who here
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RedRedRobin
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 12:23:12 » |
|
Yes, but the Big Question is pauld, is Bill Power still prepared to pitch in with the Fans' Consortium?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 12:25:35 » |
|
I think the bigger question is:
Is Mike Diamandis prepared to let anyone have the club?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 12:34:32 » |
|
Yes, but the Big Question is pauld, is Bill Power still prepared to pitch in with the Fans' Consortium? Yes. How many times would you like me to answer this?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
 Online
Posts: 57757
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 12:43:27 » |
|
Yes, but the Big Question is pauld, is Bill Power still prepared to pitch in with the Fans' Consortium? Yes. How many times would you like me to answer this? 42 please. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12832
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 12:44:28 » |
|
Is that 42 in total or 42 more times?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 12:49:51 » |
|
I'm sure the 42 in total mark could have been passed already!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
lebowski
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 12:50:21 » |
|
on the subject of Bill Power, anyone know how his rehabilitation is coming along?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 12:59:51 » |
|
on the subject of Bill Power, anyone know how his rehabilitation is coming along? checked out of rehab last week and still clean last I heard |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12832
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 13:30:02 » |
|
nah, he's back on the crack already - bought some off me last night.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 13:41:19 » |
|
You're such a pusher John.
p.s. can I have some crack please?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 14:09:25 » |
|
Yes, but the Big Question is pauld, is Bill Power still prepared to pitch in with the Fans' Consortium? Yes. How many times would you like me to answer this? 42 please. Kind of walked right into that didn't I? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RedRedRobin
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007, 15:35:42 » |
|
So did I with you Paul!
I hadn't seen any mention of Bill Power in this regard recently and wondered if he was still as keen to go ahead if the chance presented itself. Maybe I haven't kept up to date on this but as we all know things can turn around quite quickly and some time has now passed since the Amigos appeared on the scene.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
