Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 11:09:10 » |
|
Yey, Jabba. Jabba jabba hey...I don't want to be a pinhead no more....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
 |
« Reply #46 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 11:24:00 » |
|
2+2=5 I think you'll find it equals four.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« Reply #47 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 11:55:04 » |
|
2+2=5 I think you'll find it equals four. Thats right...2 marine isopods + two marine isopods = 4 marine isopods. Not sure about supermarine isopods though :?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #48 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 12:33:09 » |
|
2+2=5 I think you'll find it equals four. Thats right...2 marine isopods + two marine isopods = 4 marine isopods. Not sure about supermarine isopods though :? Those giant isopods types tend to be solitary scavengers which aren't above a bit of cannibalism. I think if you put 4 together you'd soon have only 1 or 2. They'd be pretty ace in some sort of real life pokemon game.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lebowski
|
 |
« Reply #49 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 13:50:44 » |
|
you guys!
so to summarise this thread, no-one knows anything, but everyone likes to think that they do.
same old say mould.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 14:36:10 » |
|
You forgot to mention the Isopods!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« Reply #51 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 14:56:11 » |
|
2+2=5 I think you'll find it equals four. Thats right...2 marine isopods + two marine isopods = 4 marine isopods. Not sure about supermarine isopods though :? Those giant isopods types tend to be solitary scavengers which aren't above a bit of cannibalism. I think if you put 4 together you'd soon have only 1 or 2. They'd be pretty ace in some sort of real life pokemon game. Its a fair point....they're also not above scavenging on dead manatee.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
 |
« Reply #52 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 15:14:40 » |
|
Are you going to Millwall Bart? I'm not taking the piss. I don't think Bart's talking to me. Oh well. Dell Boy had the decency to reply to my pm. Bart couldn't even give me a yes or no. Buying a house would probably be less complicated.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #53 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 15:25:37 » |
|
2+2=5 I think you'll find it equals four. Thats right...2 marine isopods + two marine isopods = 4 marine isopods. Not sure about supermarine isopods though :? Those giant isopods types tend to be solitary scavengers which aren't above a bit of cannibalism. I think if you put 4 together you'd soon have only 1 or 2. They'd be pretty ace in some sort of real life pokemon game. Its a fair point....they're also not above scavenging on dead manatee. Probably not, but then I doubt they encounter dead manatees very often.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« Reply #54 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 16:09:16 » |
|
2+2=5 I think you'll find it equals four. Thats right...2 marine isopods + two marine isopods = 4 marine isopods. Not sure about supermarine isopods though :? Those giant isopods types tend to be solitary scavengers which aren't above a bit of cannibalism. I think if you put 4 together you'd soon have only 1 or 2. They'd be pretty ace in some sort of real life pokemon game. Its a fair point....they're also not above scavenging on dead manatee. Probably not, but then I doubt they encounter dead manatees very often. You've obviously never checked out the manatee graveyard off the coast of Florida....a mecca for Bathynomus giganteus
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 16:19:28 » |
|
I thought our friendly giant cousins of the woodlouse only lived in proper deep waters? I was under the impression that manatees like to stay in shallower waters. Hence why they are often ripped up by boats. Poor things.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #56 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 16:23:21 » |
|
That was horribly worded, even for me. I originally said Our giant woodlice cousins, but that made it sound like humans had evolved closely with some giant woodlice, which is silly. Then I tried to edit it and confused myself. I think you can see what I meant.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
 |
« Reply #57 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 16:27:28 » |
|
hole. dig. stop.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« Reply #58 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 16:55:31 » |
|
That was horribly worded, even for me. I originally said Our giant woodlice cousins, but that made it sound like humans had evolved closely with some giant woodlice, which is silly. Then I tried to edit it and confused myself. I think you can see what I meant. Not as silly as it may seem....it is thought that vertebrates, so also humans evolved a central nervous system, out of invertebrate marine creatures like the sea squirt. The seas squirt, basically takes in fluids and squirts them out....bit like some birds.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sippo
Living in the 80s
Offline
Posts: 15614
I ain't gettin on no plane fool
|
 |
« Reply #59 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 17:07:21 » |
|
Well, yes, except that that's what exchanging contracts in any deal is all about - you pay the monies owed when the contracts are signed and exchanged. It's a basic of any business deal. In that respect, it's a lot like buying a house ..... :evil: Signing contracts means nothing. I found out the hard way.... 
|
|
|
Logged
|
If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
|
|
|
|