Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: No little or Brevitt today  (Read 7669 times)
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #45 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 11:09:10 »

Quote from: "flammableBen"
Yey, Jabba.


  Jabba jabba hey...I don't want to be a pinhead no more....
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36334




« Reply #46 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 11:24:00 »

Quote from: "STFC_Gazzza"
2+2=5


I think you'll find it equals four.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #47 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 11:55:04 »

Quote from: "Si Pie"
Quote from: "STFC_Gazzza"
2+2=5


I think you'll find it equals four.


  Thats right...2 marine isopods + two marine isopods = 4 marine isopods.

  Not sure about supermarine isopods though  :?
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #48 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 12:33:09 »

Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Quote from: "Si Pie"
Quote from: "STFC_Gazzza"
2+2=5


I think you'll find it equals four.


  Thats right...2 marine isopods + two marine isopods = 4 marine isopods.

  Not sure about supermarine isopods though  :?


Those giant isopods types tend to be solitary scavengers which aren't above a bit of cannibalism. I think if you put 4 together you'd soon have only 1 or 2.

They'd be pretty ace in some sort of real life pokemon game.
Logged
lebowski

« Reply #49 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 13:50:44 »

you guys!

so to summarise this thread, no-one knows anything, but everyone likes to think that they do.

same old say mould.
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36334




« Reply #50 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 14:36:10 »

You forgot to mention the Isopods!
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #51 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 14:56:11 »

Quote from: "flammableBen"
Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Quote from: "Si Pie"
Quote from: "STFC_Gazzza"
2+2=5


I think you'll find it equals four.


  Thats right...2 marine isopods + two marine isopods = 4 marine isopods.

  Not sure about supermarine isopods though  :?


Those giant isopods types tend to be solitary scavengers which aren't above a bit of cannibalism. I think if you put 4 together you'd soon have only 1 or 2.

They'd be pretty ace in some sort of real life pokemon game.


  Its a fair point....they're also not above scavenging on dead manatee.
Logged
Sussex

« Reply #52 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 15:14:40 »

Quote from: "Sussex"
Quote from: "Sussex"
Are you going to Millwall Bart? I'm not taking the piss.


I don't think Bart's talking to me. Oh well.


Dell Boy had the decency to reply to my pm. Bart couldn't even give me a yes or no.

Buying a house would probably be less complicated.
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #53 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 15:25:37 »

Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Quote from: "flammableBen"
Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Quote from: "Si Pie"
Quote from: "STFC_Gazzza"
2+2=5


I think you'll find it equals four.


  Thats right...2 marine isopods + two marine isopods = 4 marine isopods.

  Not sure about supermarine isopods though  :?


Those giant isopods types tend to be solitary scavengers which aren't above a bit of cannibalism. I think if you put 4 together you'd soon have only 1 or 2.

They'd be pretty ace in some sort of real life pokemon game.


  Its a fair point....they're also not above scavenging on dead manatee.


Probably not, but then I doubt they encounter dead manatees very often.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #54 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 16:09:16 »

Quote from: "flammableBen"
Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Quote from: "flammableBen"
Quote from: "Reg Smeeton"
Quote from: "Si Pie"
Quote from: "STFC_Gazzza"
2+2=5


I think you'll find it equals four.


  Thats right...2 marine isopods + two marine isopods = 4 marine isopods.

  Not sure about supermarine isopods though  :?


Those giant isopods types tend to be solitary scavengers which aren't above a bit of cannibalism. I think if you put 4 together you'd soon have only 1 or 2.

They'd be pretty ace in some sort of real life pokemon game.


  Its a fair point....they're also not above scavenging on dead manatee.


Probably not, but then I doubt they encounter dead manatees very often.


  You've obviously never checked out the manatee graveyard off the coast of Florida....a mecca for  Bathynomus giganteus
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #55 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 16:19:28 »

I thought our friendly giant cousins of the woodlouse only lived in proper deep waters? I was under the impression that manatees like to stay in shallower waters. Hence why they are often ripped up by boats. Poor things.
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #56 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 16:23:21 »

That was horribly worded, even for me. I originally said Our giant woodlice cousins,  but that made it sound like humans had evolved closely with some giant woodlice, which is silly. Then I tried to edit it and confused myself. I think you can see what I meant.
Logged
axs
naaarrrrrppppp

Offline Offline

Posts: 13469





Ignore
« Reply #57 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 16:27:28 »

hole. dig. stop.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #58 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 16:55:31 »

Quote from: "flammableBen"
That was horribly worded, even for me. I originally said Our giant woodlice cousins,  but that made it sound like humans had evolved closely with some giant woodlice, which is silly. Then I tried to edit it and confused myself. I think you can see what I meant.


  Not as silly as it may seem....it is thought that vertebrates, so also humans evolved a central nervous system, out of invertebrate marine creatures like the sea squirt.

   The seas squirt, basically takes in fluids and squirts them out....bit like some birds.
Logged
Sippo
Living in the 80s

Offline Offline

Posts: 15614


I ain't gettin on no plane fool




Ignore
« Reply #59 on: Sunday, September 23, 2007, 17:07:21 »

Quote from: "pauld"
Well, yes, except that that's what exchanging contracts in any deal is all about - you pay the monies owed when the contracts are signed and exchanged. It's a basic of any business deal. In that respect, it's a lot like buying a house .....



 :evil:  Signing contracts means nothing. I found out the hard way.... Sad
Logged

If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88 miles per hour, you're gonna see some serious shit...
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
Print
Jump to: