Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Club Accounts FY05-06  (Read 1665 times)
Summerof69

Offline Offline

Posts: 8598





Ignore
« on: Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 16:04:19 »

http://www.truststfc.co.uk/news_item.php?id=1111

The Swindon Town FC accounts for the 2005-06 season have finally been completed and once again show a familiar story of massive debts and ongoing losses.

The headline loss for the year was £732,485, down from £1.3million the previous year, but this figure was only achievable as a result of £600,000 of additional income from the sales of Sam Parkin to Ipswich and Rory Fallon to Swansea. Without the profit from player sales, the headline loss would have been almost identical to the previous year.

Costs were trimmed from the previous year with administrative expenses down from £1.4 million to £1.25 million, while cost of sales fell from £3.4 million to £2.9 million. This was offset by a fall in turnover from £3.5million to just under £3.2million as the team were relegated to the bottom division.

Interest payments continued to rise to £381,059 or around 12% of the turnover for the period. In other words, for every £8 of income, £1 was required just to pay interest on the clubs mountain of debt.

Regarding the CVA, the accounts state :

"In August 2002 the company entered into a five year Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA). A final payment of £900,000 payable by June 2007 has not been made, and as a consequence the CVA did not successfully complete in August 2007."

It goes on to say :

"The company is currently in the process of being acquired by new investors. Once the sale is completed the new investors will provide sufficient funding to pay the final CVA instalment. However, should the completion of sale not take place, the company will seek approval from its CVA creditors to delay the CVA completion for sufficient time to keep the company trading and to secure alternative funding."
Logged

BAZINGA !!

Join the Red Army Fund and donate at www.redarmyfund.co.uk

Join the Football Supporters Federation for FREE at www.fsf.org.uk/join.php
stfctownenda

Offline Offline

Posts: 1818





Ignore
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 16:11:15 »

Quote from: "Summerof69"
http://www.truststfc.co.uk/news_item.php?id=1111

The Swindon Town FC accounts for the 2005-06 season have finally been completed and once again show a familiar story of massive debts and ongoing losses.

The headline loss for the year was £732,485, down from £1.3million the previous year, but this figure was only achievable as a result of £600,000 of additional income from the sales of Sam Parkin to Ipswich and Rory Fallon to Swansea. Without the profit from player sales, the headline loss would have been almost identical to the previous year.

Costs were trimmed from the previous year with administrative expenses down from £1.4 million to £1.25 million, while cost of sales fell from £3.4 million to £2.9 million. This was offset by a fall in turnover from £3.5million to just under £3.2million as the team were relegated to the bottom division.

Interest payments continued to rise to £381,059 or around 12% of the turnover for the period. In other words, for every £8 of income, £1 was required just to pay interest on the clubs mountain of debt.

Regarding the CVA, the accounts state :

"In August 2002 the company entered into a five year Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA). A final payment of £900,000 payable by June 2007 has not been made, and as a consequence the CVA did not successfully complete in August 2007."

It goes on to say :

"The company is currently in the process of being acquired by new investors. Once the sale is completed the new investors will provide sufficient funding to pay the final CVA instalment. However, should the completion of sale not take place, the company will seek approval from its CVA creditors to delay the CVA completion for sufficient time to keep the company trading and to secure alternative funding."
[/b]

 :shock: Hope that's more a case of covering there own backs rather than things are going a bit tits up reference the takeover.
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36334




« Reply #2 on: Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 16:28:24 »

It's a case of the auditors saying that they have made the accounts on the basis that the company is going to continue to trade. If not they wouldn't be able to say the company was a going concern and the accounts would be prepared on a break up basis.

There's no real new news here, but it again shows how much crap the Diamandis era has got us into. Especially regarding the interest on the debt.
Logged
Richard4acre

Offline Offline

Posts: 152





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 16:57:00 »

I believe its considerring the company as a going concern. Which in short means you assume it will continue to operate for the forseeable futue. Though peorsnally "going" doesnt sound to pretty (i.e liquidation, chipenham) and "concern" doesnt really do the problem of freefalling over the last 10 years justice  
Logged

ne day, The County Ground will be a happy place.
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36334




« Reply #4 on: Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 17:00:54 »

There's only one thing worse than an accountant and that's accounting jokes.
Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 17:03:09 »

Quote from: "Si Pie"
There's only one thing worse than an accountant and that's accounting jokes.



Solicitors are worse.

Fucking leeches the lot of them....................
Logged

It's All Good..............
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36334




« Reply #6 on: Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 17:06:48 »

Quote from: "herthab"
Quote from: "Si Pie"
There's only one thing worse than an accountant and that's accounting jokes.



Solicitors are worse.

Fucking leeches the lot of them....................


especially if they're jewish  Wink
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 12320




Ignore
« Reply #7 on: Thursday, September 20, 2007, 09:50:09 »

£381k of interest charged, that seems quite hefty.  presuming 10% as a high rate to charge given the loans would have been aquired over a period of low rates, that would be on loans of £4m ish.  I'm sure the St Modwen ones were a lower rate though.

I love the way we've always harped on about the rent as the thing that crippled us!!!!!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: