|
Spud
|
 |
« on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 15:55:47 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
 Offline
Posts: 12836
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 16:02:40 » |
|
I wonder what was said?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 16:05:28 » |
|
I think someone said that the Club had fixed the attendance as they do a 'guess the attendance game', he run's the forum that the Club have shut down.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFCBird
Ralphy's Wet Dream
Offline
Posts: 10673
C U Next Tuesday!
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 16:05:30 » |
|
Why should he be held up for what some other dick posted?
Can we get the same done to Bart?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 16:08:15 » |
|
Why should he be held up for what some other dick posted?
Can we get the same done to Bart? Whits would be the person getting the ban though. All seems pretty harsh! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 16:21:31 » |
|
so much for freedom of speech.
hereford are out of order
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 16:36:15 » |
|
Thats disgusting.
I dont normally bother with online petitions but ive signed that one as should everyone who ever uses any forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57846
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 16:42:20 » |
|
Happened to the Cov City admin on their Rivals site. Got threatened to be taken to court by the then chairman over a posting made by someone else. The posting was removed within minutes of the Admin being notified (was up to view for a few hours IIRC) and called the chairman something like 'scoundrel' (dictionary def: an unprincipled, dishonorable person; villain. ).
They soon backed down when a) it was shown to be shakey legally speaking b) he raised enough money to fight it from other fans donations.
It is indeed madness.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27183
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 16:57:19 » |
|
Fair enough if they'd asked him to remove the post, but to shut down the forum and receive a life times ban? Fucking utter madness.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 17:10:28 » |
|
Fuck him, hereford scummy bastard  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Whits
Morphined Up
Offline
Posts: 8136
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 17:10:34 » |
|
Why should he be held up for what some other dick posted?
Can we get the same done to Bart? Whits would be the person getting the ban though. All seems pretty harsh! Thank fuck for that...i've been looking for an excuse not to go |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Plays in midfield and his name is Tommy Miller,
signed him from Huddersfield his name is Tommy Miller,
first touch is average but his second is a killer,
heeeeeey Tommy Miller!
|
|
|
ronnie21
Offline
Posts: 6154
The Mighty Hankerton
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 17:57:03 » |
|
So he's banned for, perhaps, telling the truth, invite him to SN1 and let him have a go at Greasy Mike!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Red81
Offline
Posts: 1836
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 19:10:41 » |
|
There's got to be more to it than that. A comment on a forum means nothing. It's just an opinion. A documented conversation.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Victory is sweet even deep in the cheap seats
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12323
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 19:17:24 » |
|
There's got to be more to it than that. A comment on a forum means nothing. It's just an opinion. A documented conversation. Not if it's a statement pertaining to be fact. You may as well have it published in The Times and ask for your own court date if it's libellous. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Red81
Offline
Posts: 1836
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Thursday, August 30, 2007, 19:18:43 » |
|
There's got to be more to it than that. A comment on a forum means nothing. It's just an opinion. A documented conversation. Not if it's a statement pertaining to be fact. You may as well have it published in The Times and ask for your own court date if it's libellous. Good point. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Victory is sweet even deep in the cheap seats
|
|
|
|
