RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12320
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 08:21:07 » |
|
Hmm, if it's 75% and they want to have us believe they were not telling porkies, then that must leave them about 2% if POwer has the rest with Emmell.
More likely is the winding-up of the current holding co??
75% sounds good to me, it would certainly show why moves are being made that are at utter odds with what we'd expect even from Mikey. The worrying thing though is what do "THEY" want to do, as I will now have to call "THEM". PLus, what kind of appointment is a recently retired footballer into a role of Sporting Director, especially one from Oxford. The longer I mull that one over the odder it seems.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WorcesterRed
Offline
Posts: 186
|
 |
« Reply #61 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 08:41:43 » |
|
Maverick seems conspicuous by his absence given the interrogation of the Trust/Consortium's proposals. Come on Mav, let's hear your questionning of the current takeover proposals. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12320
|
 |
« Reply #62 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 08:42:20 » |
|
Eere, Maverick, can't you begin asking questions about the Consortium now we know one of the link men associated with them? Brevett should have his hands full in the next few days responding I guess.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dell boy
|
 |
« Reply #63 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 09:06:14 » |
|
Eere, Maverick, can't you begin asking questions about the Consortium now we know one of the link men associated with them? Brevett should have his hands full in the next few days responding I guess. Mav is in full voice on ThisIs 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC4LIFE
Fence Fucker
Offline
Posts: 2785
|
 |
« Reply #64 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 09:10:15 » |
|
The deal is already signed, it's been signed since they announced it. Thats why they are able to make the appointments already.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12320
|
 |
« Reply #65 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 09:16:22 » |
|
Eere, Maverick, can't you begin asking questions about the Consortium now we know one of the link men associated with them? Brevett should have his hands full in the next few days responding I guess. Mav is in full voice on ThisIs  But he keeps harping on about privacy and not knowing who they are. Brevett has been publicly paraded as the mouthpiece for them, so he should get a move on now and begin the onslaught.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WorcesterRed
Offline
Posts: 186
|
 |
« Reply #66 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 09:22:04 » |
|
Eere, Maverick, can't you begin asking questions about the Consortium now we know one of the link men associated with them? Brevett should have his hands full in the next few days responding I guess. Mav is in full voice on ThisIs  ....but he was more than happy to come on here earlier in the year to ask all sorts of questions of the Trust/Consortium proposals. Not at all a witch-hunt on my part, I just like to see fairness and balance and given the number of unanswered questions that we all now have, and given the number of questions Mav previously asked, I'd have thought that he'd be in his element. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12320
|
 |
« Reply #67 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 09:27:06 » |
|
exactly, they've begun breaking cover by announcing an appointment for them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
 |
« Reply #68 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 09:28:26 » |
|
25 percent of the current regime is 25 percent too much
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12320
|
 |
« Reply #69 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 09:34:13 » |
|
How do they get 25%, the new lot 75% and Power and Emmell 23%.
Are we breaking mathematical rules?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
 |
« Reply #70 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 09:37:32 » |
|
I dont think they intend letting Power and Emmell have even 1 percent somehow!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dell boy
|
 |
« Reply #71 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 09:50:41 » |
|
How do they get 25%, the new lot 75% and Power and Emmell 23%.
Are we breaking mathematical rules? 100% went out of fashion years ago. You often here people say they will give 150% towards this cause and that. All that really means is just 100% spread out a bit more to give everyone a fare share. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Colin Todd
Offline
Posts: 3318
|
 |
« Reply #72 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 10:11:12 » |
|
How do they get 25%, the new lot 75% and Power and Emmell 23%.
Are we breaking mathematical rules? If this 75% / 25% split stuff is true pehaps BP /PE are going to get their £1.2m back as part of the deal?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #73 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 10:21:40 » |
|
Sounds as if we will be seeing the end of the current lot bar the Wills family who will probably keep 25% of their current holding. As for BP/PE i would assume that either the club still thinks it's a loan or that the new consortium will pay them the money back
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lebowski
|
 |
« Reply #74 on: Wednesday, July 11, 2007, 10:42:06 » |
|
i predict 25% of it is bollocks
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|