Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Shouldn't we have a sponsor by now?  (Read 4326 times)
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27180





Ignore
« on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 08:35:01 »

Yes, yes, yes. I know this has probably been done to death already, but it's 1st June which means we've effectively only got 4 weeks until pre-season - but still no shirt sponsor.

Other clubs already have their new shirts on sale, so what's the hold-up?
Logged
Tails

Online Online

Posts: 10191


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 08:39:37 »

Maybe we're going retro and not having a sponsor.  Cool
Logged
fatbury

« Reply #2 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 08:39:40 »

The list of errors made by the current board just continues to grow ...

No new sponsor
Media arrangement with Brunel
Groundshare
Lack of CVA payment
Lack of transfer funds for Luggy
PR is a nightmare
Lack of new ground in Swindon and probable relocate to Chipp'nam
not to mention the many many lies we have been told - 80 percent support for Groundshare, Power is bankrupt, there is no consortium, CVA will be paid/renegotiated and so on and so on

and yet they tell us they are the people for the job - get real and get out! :evil:
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 57758





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 08:54:30 »

Bit unusual not to have anounced by now. Not sure why that would be really other than they are still dotting the I's and crossing the T's.

Actually, when did teh Nationwide contract run out. Pehaps they are waiting for that to expire before announcing?
Logged
Tails

Online Online

Posts: 10191


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 08:59:53 »

Do the new sponsor get the Nationwide Stand as well?
Logged
fatbury

« Reply #5 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 09:02:48 »

Yes I believe they do - although not in time for the Season tickets - just says South Stand - when really it should be classed as Shrivenham Road End in the traditionalist view
Logged
mattboyslim

« Reply #6 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 09:03:29 »

Quote from: "fatbury"
Yes I believe they do - although not in time for the Season tickets - just says South Stand - when really it should be classed as Shrivenham Road End in the traditionalist view


Or the Shrivenham Road Stand, as End implies it's behind the goal.
Logged
fatbury

« Reply #7 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 09:28:55 »

yeah true but always used to be known as end .. didnt it Reg?
Logged
Give us an S

Offline Offline

Posts: 1954





Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 09:35:58 »

Fred said he saw the kit and it had a sponsor. Maybe we have it, but its not been announced. It is all very strange! Why the big secret?
Logged
Cookie

Offline Offline

Posts: 1263




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 10:05:27 »

No sponsor, we'll be like barca.
Logged
Tails

Online Online

Posts: 10191


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #10 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 10:33:17 »

Quote from: "Give_us_an_S"
Fred said he saw the kit and it had a sponsor. Maybe we have it, but its not been announced. It is all very strange! Why the big secret?


I saw the kit yesterday as well.  Beers
Logged
fatbury

« Reply #11 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 10:38:54 »

did it have the Kingswood thing on it?
Logged
axs
naaarrrrrppppp

Offline Offline

Posts: 13469





Ignore
« Reply #12 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 10:40:20 »

and the TEF badge?
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #13 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 10:43:43 »

Quote from: "fatbury"
yeah true but always used to be known as end .. didnt it Reg?


 No....Shrivenham Road Stand....or South Side
Logged
Tails

Online Online

Posts: 10191


Git facked




Ignore
« Reply #14 on: Friday, June 1, 2007, 10:54:05 »

Quote from: "fatbury"
did it have the Kingswood thing on it?


I don't think it was actually the new kit, but it was certainly a white lotto top.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
Print
Jump to: