Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
Offline
Posts: 59598
Things can only get better
|
|
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:28:35 » |
|
number 2 by miles for me.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
Frigby Daser
Offline
Posts: 3865
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:28:44 » |
|
Why gold? I want a badge that means something, but they look like a simplified, tacky version of the old one. Just use the old one!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bushey Boy
Offline
Posts: 8351
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:36:44 » |
|
any chance someone can post on here,. im not signed up to official site and cant be arsed
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:44:39 » |
|
Bad news folks.....this is Blodwyn's work, seems he still expects to be around for a while then.....if its tradition you want, then the diamond has been on our shirts for longer than any other badge.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:47:21 » |
|
But the diamonds shit Reg. bring back the 1989 badge!!
Option 3's the closest though so that'll get my vote.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
magic8ball
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:48:51 » |
|
Since we've had the diamond, we've been shit. FACT!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16355
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:52:32 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
ibelieveinmrreeves
Should've gone to Specsavers
Offline
Posts: 3857
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:59:03 » |
|
I'd rather have the 1990 badger back. Failing that, option three (but they all look fucking naff).
|
|
|
Logged
|
Even men with steel hearts love to see a dog on the pitch.
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 09:59:58 » |
|
Option three has the train in the right place - now make it green, put the football in the corner, put the robin at the top, add soem more colour and hey presto.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55573
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 10:00:12 » |
|
I think 3 then. Not sure I like the 1879 on it though. Replace it with the ball which should be removed from the sash. Oh and the robin can move to on top of the train and we can put 'Division X' there in it's place. Oh and the train needs to be green.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 10:00:38 » |
|
But the diamonds shit Reg. bring back the 1989 badge!!
Option 3's the closest though so that'll get my vote. Not half as shit as those on offer....what do they say.... We're a club stuck in the past, and a fairly distant past as well.....couldn't some clever type (FB?) design a badge which more reflects today....orange football.....Newbury, cash black hole that sort of thing?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 10:12:48 » |
|
They're crap and will look dull as dishwater on a red shirt.
Hope they didn't pay someone to come up with them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 10:28:14 » |
|
What a shame - Years have complaints have been about the return of the OLD badge not the introduction of a re-working. It's far too red. Option 3 is the better of a poor selection.
What's more significant is that they have acknowledged 1879 as our date of being founded!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bushey Boy
Offline
Posts: 8351
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 10:35:25 » |
|
cheers dave, look crap though, try again please!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 10:39:15 » |
|
Personally 1-3 are crap.
Rather keep the one we've got at the moment.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|