|
magic8ball
|
 |
« Reply #165 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:49:56 » |
|
We're not losing just because Monkhouse's transfer didn't include a clause, to suggest such a thing is absolutely ridiculous. If he wasn't playing, he wouldn't have scored. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Leggett
 Offline
Posts: 7863
|
|
« Reply #166 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:50:44 » |
|
*cries* shit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fuck you Leggett, fuck you.
|
|
|
|
magic8ball
|
|
« Reply #167 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:50:56 » |
|
Arrrghhhhhh
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #168 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:51:42 » |
|
We're not losing just because Monkhouse's transfer didn't include a clause, to suggest such a thing is absolutely ridiculous. If he wasn't playing, he wouldn't have scored. If my aunt had bollocks she'd be my uncle. It's all totally fucking irrelevent, someone else would probably have scored anyway. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
manc red
Offline
Posts: 732
|
|
« Reply #169 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:52:59 » |
|
C'MON TOWN 1 min left
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....
Offline
Posts: 6351
Fartmeister
|
|
« Reply #170 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:53:46 » |
|
We're not losing just because Monkhouse's transfer didn't include a clause, to suggest such a thing is absolutely ridiculous. If he wasn't playing, he wouldn't have scored. If my aunt had bollocks she'd be my uncle. It's all totally fucking irrelevent, someone else would probably have scored anyway. No point trying to apply logic on this forum. You should know that. :roll: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rossi
Offline
Posts: 1604
|
|
« Reply #171 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:53:46 » |
|
Bollocks!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
manc red
Offline
Posts: 732
|
|
« Reply #172 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:54:08 » |
|
bollocks, the result was kinda written in the stars today wasnt it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #173 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:54:54 » |
|
bollocks, the result was kinda written in the stars today wasnt it Yep - We've got to bounce back from this - quick sharp. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
magic8ball
|
|
« Reply #174 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:55:31 » |
|
If any of you want to be really, really annoyed, try having a quick listen to the Hartlepool commentary :x
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....
Offline
Posts: 6351
Fartmeister
|
|
« Reply #175 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:55:52 » |
|
Another goal conceded from a set piece.
The boot was on the other foot six months ago.
Its how we react next week thats important now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Stef Troll
Offline
Posts: 3161
|
|
« Reply #176 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:56:37 » |
|
Ah well, against a good defence, players like Roberts wont score you many goals. Still fair play to Hartlepool, they defended well and sounded worthy winners. Lets hope we can bounce back and win our next game
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #177 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:57:46 » |
|
Walsall equalised too  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Frigby Daser
Offline
Posts: 4173
|
|
« Reply #178 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:57:47 » |
|
Game on:
Walsall 31 64 28 48 1-1 FT v Rochdale
Swindon 31 60 17 43 0-1 FT v Hartlepool
Hartlepool 31 58 15 39 1-0 FT v Swindon
Franchise 31 58 13 53 2-0 FT v Bury
Lincoln City 31 56 16 56 1-3 v Notts County
Stockport 31 50 10 44 2-0 FT v Hereford
Wycombe 31 50 8 34 2-0 v Wrexham
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #179 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:58:08 » |
|
Ah well, against a good defence, players like Roberts wont score you many goals. So it's Roberts' fault we lost? Absolutely nothing to do with the other ten players on the pitch? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
