pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....
 Offline
Posts: 6351
Fartmeister
|
 |
« Reply #150 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:37:55 » |
|
12 minutes left...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority
Offline
Posts: 15731
|
|
« Reply #151 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:39:31 » |
|
C'MON !!!!! :x
NMH
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
|
|
|
|
magic8ball
|
|
« Reply #152 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:40:29 » |
|
I know its a pointless thing to say, but should Sturrock have insisted on a 'can't play against us' clause in Monky's contract?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rossi
Offline
Posts: 1604
|
|
« Reply #153 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:41:32 » |
|
I know its a pointless thing to say, but should Sturrock have insisted on a 'can't play against us' clause in Monky's contract? Clearly yes |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #154 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:41:54 » |
|
I know its a pointless thing to say, but should Sturrock have insisted on a 'can't play against us' clause in Monky's contract? I don't think Monkhouse's ability has done us over today - it's sods law (annoying) - I didn't care that the clause hadn't been put in but we've caught Hartlepool on great form - it's about scoring goals and we are not looking good today. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....
Offline
Posts: 6351
Fartmeister
|
|
« Reply #155 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:42:27 » |
|
I know its a pointless thing to say, but should Sturrock have insisted on a 'can't play against us' clause in Monky's contract? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think that is Sturrock's call. Ultimately, doesn't Mike D negotiate all contract dealings, in and out? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
magic8ball
|
|
« Reply #156 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:43:12 » |
|
Not creating anything at the minute :disapprove:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
magic8ball
|
|
« Reply #157 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:43:36 » |
|
I know its a pointless thing to say, but should Sturrock have insisted on a 'can't play against us' clause in Monky's contract? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think that is Sturrock's call. Ultimately, doesn't Mike D negotiate all contract dealings, in and out? Gives us something else to abuse him for. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rich Pullen
|
|
« Reply #158 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:47:08 » |
|
I'm loving this referee today :evil:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rossi
Offline
Posts: 1604
|
|
« Reply #159 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:48:27 » |
|
Doesn't look like were gona get anything out of this  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority
Offline
Posts: 15731
|
|
« Reply #160 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:48:39 » |
|
Is that it ?
NMH
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
|
|
|
|
magic8ball
|
|
« Reply #161 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:49:29 » |
|
Surely due to the unofficial rules of football, we should be all over them at the moment?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #162 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:49:32 » |
|
We're not losing just because Monkhouse's transfer didn't include a clause, to suggest such a thing is absolutely ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
manc red
Offline
Posts: 732
|
|
« Reply #163 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:49:42 » |
|
30 secs plus extra time ish
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
adje
Offline
Posts: 14806
|
|
« Reply #164 on: Saturday, February 3, 2007, 16:49:47 » |
|
We're shit at home!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
quot;Molten memories splashing down
upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
|
|
|
|
