jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
 Offline
Posts: 12832
|
 |
« on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 12:00:54 » |
|
Well now, whats this? 25 minutes of football and two goals? Should Sturrock Jr be starting for STFC?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Stef Troll
Offline
Posts: 3161
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 12:08:35 » |
|
How to accomodate him ? Straight swap between him and Roberts im guessing ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9738
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 12:11:52 » |
|
How to accomodate him ? Straight swap between him and Roberts im guessing ? yes. i was unimpressed with roberts again last night. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33886
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 12:33:01 » |
|
Roberts out Blair in  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Leggett
 Online
Posts: 7863
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 12:39:08 » |
|
i agree.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Fuck you Leggett, fuck you.
|
|
|
|
Scot Munroe
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 12:39:22 » |
|
Roberts out Blair in i would also agree with that. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER
Offline
Posts: 12832
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 12:53:19 » |
|
I would say if he were to start it would have to be Roberts dropped. But then again that might be eaxctly what roberts needs...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chubbs
Offline
Posts: 10517
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 12:53:38 » |
|
Definatly, i mean he might not be fully fit but he shuold be able to play more than 5 minutes, well he's allready shown he only needs 5 min on 2 occasions but if he plays more then he will score more goals.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 12:56:51 » |
|
I've not seen enough to say he should start or not, but I'm surpised Lukas has drifted out of teh team, initially I though he was being rested, but obviously not. From what I saw of him he looked very good in the few matches he started, I guess 'cock and robbo have been scoring reasonabley frequently and just about doing enough to keep their places.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 13:04:25 » |
|
i'd go for roberts out wide and sturrock in upfront
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33886
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 13:06:26 » |
|
i'd go for roberts out wide and sturrock in upfront I'd agree if you could guarentee me Roberts would play to the best of his ability out there. Sturrock put him out wide left last night and he was fucking shite! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
paul_stfc
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 13:10:49 » |
|
Blair sturrock :fu:  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 13:12:45 » |
|
Blair sturrock :fu: Hahaha ace. You crack me up |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 13:24:21 » |
|
i'd go for roberts out wide and sturrock in upfront I'd agree if you could guarentee me Roberts would play to the best of his ability out there. Sturrock put him out wide left last night and he was fucking shite! no guarantees but roberts can whip quality balls in for fun.shakes cannot do this enough imo.having said that if roberts didn't perform then of course he should be dropped. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Red
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 13:29:26 » |
|
I'd prefer him to keep doing what he's doing actually - why change it?
Besides which, haven't his goals being presented to him on a plate - the first was a set-up by Lukas wasn't it?
What about last nights?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
