redbullzeye
Offline
Posts: 1319
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 18:22:07 » |
|
Got my vote in - 87% - damned ass is nearly an anagram of diamandes
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 18:30:52 » |
|
Got my vote in - 87% - damned ass is nearly an anagram of diamandes Mama Kiddie Sin Amid Media Skin Kinda Mime Aids Mink Aimed Aids
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Give us an S
Offline
Posts: 1954
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 18:33:43 » |
|
I put my vote in too.
Doesnt look like a minority to me that are behind the consortium.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 19:02:17 » |
|
Just had a look and at the moment it's running at 88% in favour of the consortium, 7% against and 6% unsure. Erm, which makes 101% in total 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 19:04:17 » |
|
but only 319 votes in total.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lebowski
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 19:08:54 » |
|
seeing as arriba has started pedant's hour, i would also like to add that the question is "are you behind the fan's consortium? yes, no, unsure". so clearly this poll has been set by someone in the club to find out how many backers mike wilkes has (281 at present).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 19:09:44 » |
|
Done! As it stands 88% have said yes, woohoo! I voted yes but it's now at 87% I bet the adver will change it to 50/50 by the end of the poll.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12316
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 19:57:58 » |
|
but only 319 votes in total. That's not bad. The daily TV viewing figures (which advertisers then spend millions based on) come from less than 2000 households I think - BARB. If it's good enough for them, it's good enough fo me. It'll be much higher in day or two, and anything over a few hundred is a fair sample size.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TalkTalk
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 20:21:44 » |
|
373 votes and 87% for now.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Whits
Morphined Up
Offline
Posts: 8136
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 21:34:20 » |
|
i wonder if the club are just going to sit there and vote all day tomorrow **disclaimer - i said i wonder, not they will**
|
|
|
Logged
|
Plays in midfield and his name is Tommy Miller, signed him from Huddersfield his name is Tommy Miller, first touch is average but his second is a killer, heeeeeey Tommy Miller!
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 21:36:37 » |
|
but only 319 votes in total. That's not bad. The daily TV viewing figures (which advertisers then spend millions based on) come from less than 2000 households I think - BARB. If it's good enough for them, it's good enough fo me. It'll be much higher in day or two, and anything over a few hundred is a fair sample size. i was expecting someone to come back with the point you made rob,and its a fair one. but i think votes like this are a waste of time
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC4LIFE
Fence Fucker
Offline
Posts: 2785
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 21:40:36 » |
|
seeing as arriba has started pedant's hour, i would also like to add that the question is "are you behind the fan's consortium? yes, no, unsure". so clearly this poll has been set by someone in the club to find out how many backers mike wilkes has (281 at present). I started the poll. So no it wasn't started by anyone in the club. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC4LIFE
Fence Fucker
Offline
Posts: 2785
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 21:41:17 » |
|
dean moore is almost an anagram of bob holt I wont ask but that confused me. :?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 21:43:43 » |
|
dean moore is almost an anagram of bob holt I wont ask but that confused me. :? I just noticed that. It's not at all is it. crazy days.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 21:49:24 » |
|
It's clear what the majority of fans on the internet forums want, but I wonder the proportions of non-forum folk are in favour of the consortium?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|