yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 12:21:29 » |
|
Its going to be pointless anyway they will check all questions before they are asked. They are intent on stopping free speach on this forum why would they allow it at thier own.
|
|
|
Logged
|
/ W56196272
|
|
|
millom red
Offline
Posts: 1588
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 13:38:39 » |
|
How can they check all questions yeovil? Unless they are mind readers, i cant see how they can stop anyone asking whatever they like.
|
|
|
Logged
|
f it dont need fixing....dont fuckin break it
Await The Day
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 13:46:06 » |
|
How can they check all questions yeovil? Unless they are mind readers, i cant see how they can stop anyone asking whatever they like. They could make everybody submit questions in writing before it starts then call on people to ask them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
millom red
Offline
Posts: 1588
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 14:55:00 » |
|
A managed meeting then Ben.
|
|
|
Logged
|
f it dont need fixing....dont fuckin break it
Await The Day
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 14:56:09 » |
|
A managed meeting then Ben. ooooh. fancy terms is it? 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Power to people
Offline
Posts: 6582
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 18:07:05 » |
|
If there is no Wills or Diamandis then there will be no point people turning up....and how many questions will they say "We can't answer that at the moment" or how many times will they whisper to each other before giving a standard answer.
I expect Bob Holt to be wheeled out for this as well so he can do his bit to defend Diamandis who will be extremely ill and unable to attend that evening.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 18:19:11 » |
|
If there is no Wills or Diamandis then there will be no point people turning up....and how many questions will they say "We can't answer that at the moment" or how many times will they whisper to each other before giving a standard answer.
I expect Bob Holt to be wheeled out for this as well so he can do his bit to defend Diamandis who will be extremely ill and unable to attend that evening. I think you have hit the nail on the head PTP I for one, like Rob said would like the club to confirm the attendees a couple of days before the meeting so I can decide if relevant convesrations are going to take place or it will be annother Luggy's Fans Forum. Whilst I have the upmost respect for the man and what he is achieving on the pitch, I have this niggle that this will become exactly the opposite of what Mr Bowden so publically offered last Saturday
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TalkTalk
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 19:32:50 » |
|
I think it is going to be a Sturrock type Fan's Forum.
You're a liar Mr Bowden.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 21:05:33 » |
|
Well, let's see shall we before we prejudge the likely attendees? I think it's safe to say that after categorically stating in an open meeting that all the board who weren't struck down with illness plus Diamandis (although Bowden did seem a little unsure as to whether "Mike Diomedes" as he insisted on calling him, was a director or not) and the Wills would attend, there would be considerable anger among fans if they then reneged on that. And people would perhaps draw their own conclusions about the willingness to answer questions etc. So until we know otherwise, I'd be inclined to take the initial offer at face value.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 21:34:34 » |
|
Thats what my inclination is Paul
However, I am sure there will be many "out of towner's" planning to come to pose questions of the board.
It is only courteous of them to confirm board attendees to prevent any form of backlash from those that have travelled many many miles IMO
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Maverick
Offline
Posts: 444
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 21:44:42 » |
|
Question ...... has anyone ever attended a club meeting where all those that were alleged to be attending from the club ... actually did?
I have no idea myself .... just curious.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 21:50:56 » |
|
Nope
but you heard Mr Bowden's comments with your own ears Mav.
Scheduled for the morning before the Macc game, no mention of PS. Now look what we have !
Now I have got no problem with it (I did have when it was muted that PS would be attending and everyone, myself included, still thought that it was before the Macc game)
I just hope that the original remit stands and it does not turn into a Q & A session with PS.
That is not what the invite was all about
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Maverick
Offline
Posts: 444
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 22:08:36 » |
|
My impression Fred was that it was going to be a meeting to discuss anything/everything except the proposed consortium takeover ...... and that Mike D would be there. I have no problem with as many people from the Board/Management attending as possible.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33881
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 22:15:58 » |
|
Question ...... has anyone ever attended a club meeting where all those that were alleged to be attending from the club ... actually did?
I have no idea myself .... just curious. nope, you get a fair few names at the AGM....but they dont answer anything....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Maverick
Offline
Posts: 444
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: Saturday, January 20, 2007, 22:18:38 » |
|
I guess it would be a step in the right direction if all the proposed attendees actually do show then!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|