mattyswinboy
Offline
Posts: 219
|
 |
« on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 19:03:13 » |
|
surprised nobodys noticed oxford arent top of the conference now dagenham are now top  maybe oxford are on the slide 
|
|
|
Logged
|
img]http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/aa222/mattyswinboy/collage1.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15119
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 19:24:50 » |
|
Very, VERY funny - FACT! 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33908
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 19:39:39 » |
|
I'm more worried by the fact we are 4th and 3 points behind 3rd place....but if you want to concentrate on Oxford then thats your call....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 20:23:06 » |
|
I agree with DV we should concentrate on our performance really.
However as there's an Oxford fan who goes up my local I do find it cracking news that (after he tried winding me up about Macclesfield last night) they couldn't beat Crawley at home.
Also interesting to see 11,000 there on Boxing day, only 6,300 there today, so they managed to put off 5,000 in one performance.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
larwood
The girl least likely to.
Offline
Posts: 4653
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 21:58:06 » |
|
There's always time for a bit of a laugh at the pox in my opinion They'll still come back up though,bastards :x
|
|
|
Logged
|
I was a small, fat child in a welfare house There was only one thing I ever dreamed about And fate has just Handed it to me - whoopee
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 22:56:59 » |
|
I agree with DV we should concentrate on our performance really. See, i don't understand this at all. Why would we need to "concentrate" on our performance, surely that's the staff/players jobs. Our jobs are to oust the board/support the consortium, cheer the team on and generally take the piss out of our rivals when they're shit
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 22:59:13 » |
|
and walk like egyptians
|
|
|
Logged
|
/ W56196272
|
|
|
STFCBird
Ralphy's Wet Dream
Offline
Posts: 10673
C U Next Tuesday!
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 22:59:23 » |
|
Oxford wank wank wank
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Offline
Posts: 15119
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 23:03:52 » |
|
I agree with DV we should concentrate on our performance really. See, i don't understand this at all. Why would we need to "concentrate" on our performance, surely that's the staff/players jobs. Our jobs are to oust the board/support the consortium, cheer the team on and generally take the piss out of our rivals when they're shit Agreed -I can 'concentrate' on our performance and league position until I am quite literally blue in the face but it will make fuck all difference. Let's laugh like fuck at Oxford's misfortune. If they end up in the play offs there is every chance they will fuck it up and that will be hi-fucking-larious - FACT! *Sorry for gratuitous use of the fuck word 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bartek
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 23:25:55 » |
|
Dag&Reds rulez !!! I remember they have few good players in 1998/1999 season :old: like for example Paul Cobb . Anyone knows something about him ?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16128
We'll never die!
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 23:48:02 » |
|
The fact they are there is funny. The fact they aren't the best team there is even funnier
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oxford_fan
Offline
Posts: 6764
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: Sunday, December 31, 2006, 02:13:20 » |
|
Also interesting to see 11,000 there on Boxing day, only 6,300 there today, so they managed to put off 5,000 in one performance.
hmmm, not so bad crowds really though, are they. sure the boxing day performance was shit (first half), but 11k or 6.3k (slightly above average) for a conf match is pretty damn good.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: Sunday, December 31, 2006, 02:14:28 » |
|
yes but why the drop?
was it cheaper Boxing day?
|
|
|
Logged
|
/ W56196272
|
|
|
oxford_fan
Offline
Posts: 6764
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: Sunday, December 31, 2006, 02:49:31 » |
|
naah same prices, the once-a-year-fans don't come back unless there's a trouncing, even then it would have only been 7k-ish
'kin part timers
p.s. i didnt go today
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: Sunday, December 31, 2006, 11:50:21 » |
|
good old Daggers 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|