Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Roberts the Winger  (Read 6078 times)
stfc_steve

Offline Offline

Posts: 465





Ignore
« Reply #30 on: Friday, December 29, 2006, 15:11:32 »

and if he dont like it, he will be leaving, do we want that?
Logged
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33886


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #31 on: Friday, December 29, 2006, 15:14:01 »

firstly, if he doesnt want be a team player then yes

secondly, who wants him really?

thirdly, he fucking owes us

You play players where they are best suited, not where they want to play.

In my opinion Roberts is more suited as a winger, and is much more effective as a winger. Therefore I'd play him on the wing.

I'm sure somewhere there is some secret hidden desire in Jerel to be a striker.....but you wouldnt play him up front because he 'thought' he was a striker would you!!
Logged
stfc_steve

Offline Offline

Posts: 465





Ignore
« Reply #32 on: Friday, December 29, 2006, 15:16:27 »

true, but roberts might leave he left city partly because he was being constantly played on the wing. But i see where your coming from.
Logged
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker

Offline Offline

Posts: 36334




« Reply #33 on: Friday, December 29, 2006, 16:07:45 »

I'd rather have Peacock/Lukas and Roberts as the front pair, or play Peacock just behind the other two. I think Peacock has done better now the midfield has better service from Sofi and Timlin.

I can see potential problems if we rely too much on similar forwards and teams sussing us out.
Logged
stfc_steve

Offline Offline

Posts: 465





Ignore
« Reply #34 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 20:55:30 »

Quote from: "simon pieman"
I'd rather have Peacock/Lukas and Roberts as the front pair, or play Peacock just behind the other two. I think Peacock has done better now the midfield has better service from Sofi and Timlin.

I can see potential problems if we rely too much on similar forwards and teams sussing us out.

good point, i see what you mean every team knows what we are going to do when we get in the final 3rd
Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #35 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 20:59:09 »

He's history. Which in some ways is a pity, as he's got more ability than the rest of our players combined (Zaboub and Timlin excepted)

But is attitude is all wrong and he doesn't show enough determination, or aptitude.

And he's a lazy bastard...........
Logged

It's All Good..............
hansgruber

Offline Offline

Posts: 1606




Ignore
« Reply #36 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 21:15:15 »

Who's going to take him though?
Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #37 on: Saturday, December 30, 2006, 21:19:20 »

Quote from: "hansgruber"
Who's going to take him though?


There's always some manager who'll think they can get more out of a player who's got the skill, but not the aptitude.

I would imagine that's why we bought him..............
Logged

It's All Good..............
red macca

« Reply #38 on: Sunday, December 31, 2006, 11:09:07 »

Quote from: "herthab"
He's history. Which in some ways is a pity, as he's got more ability than the rest of our players combined (Zaboub and Timlin excepted)

But is attitude is all wrong and he doesn't show enough determination, or aptitude.

And he's a lazy bastard...........
He was far from lazy yesterday.peacock was fuckin lazy
Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #39 on: Sunday, December 31, 2006, 11:16:44 »

Macca. He seemed to perk up a bit in the second half to be fair.

But he was useless in the first half.

Didn't go looking for the ball at all and spent most of the time directly in front of me with his hands on his hips.
Logged

It's All Good..............
red macca

« Reply #40 on: Sunday, December 31, 2006, 11:21:22 »

Quote from: "herthab"
Macca. He seemed to perk up a bit in the second half to be fair.

But he was useless in the first half.

Didn't go looking for the ball at all and spent most of the time directly in front of me with his hands on his hips.
But in all fairness that was probably the worst 1st half we have seen this season,they were all crap.Any chances we had again were through roberts,yesterday i can remember 4/5 great crosses going in from both wingers where the fuck was peacock and lucus yesterday tbh
Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #41 on: Sunday, December 31, 2006, 11:26:45 »

Fair points, don't get me wrong, I rate Roberts and think he's one of the few players we've got that can change a game. But he's frustrating a lot of the time and is very inconsistent, which is something that Sturrock won't accept.
Logged

It's All Good..............
normy

Offline Offline

Posts: 990





Ignore
« Reply #42 on: Sunday, December 31, 2006, 16:47:16 »

I am puzzled as to why Roberts was starved of the ball in the first half, everything seemed to go through Zaboub who did little with it.
He stayed on the wing as presumably ordered, but had no support from Smith or the midfield so I don't call him lazy. Many were shouting for him to go back and look for it, but then....we fall deeper and too defensive.
Second half Roberts was fed more and worked hard and penetrated well, with some good crosses and at least tried some shots, unlike the others. Too greedy at times perhaps, but you can't have everything.
Logged

ust be the oldest
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: