Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
 Offline
Posts: 34913
|
 |
« on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 21:30:38 » |
|
......listening to Starnes on RS before the game.....he stated that Dunwoody do the programme for free....is this likely to be true. If so do they then take all the sales? ie the programme is really nothing to do with the club.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonTownFC
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 21:31:41 » |
|
wudnt have thought they do it for free and also not take the sales
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 21:34:37 » |
|
As I understand it, this is true ie they print the programme at no charge to the club and indeed pay a licensing fee to do so, but as you correctly surmise Reg they then take the money from the sales. And no this isn't an attempt to bash Dunwoody - it's a fairly standard arrangement at a lot of clubs that they outsource the progs to another company who keep whatever they make in return for a licensing fee and/or percentage of sales. What isn't usual is then to have the man behind that company also running the club! (into the ground)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 21:36:40 » |
|
So a boycott of the programme would hit Dunwoody :twisted:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 21:38:09 » |
|
I was aware of something similar to this. I've heard rumour of all merchandising sales being the same, so the superstore £s aren't really benefitting the club
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia
Offline
Posts: 34913
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 21:43:51 » |
|
I was aware of something similar to this. I've heard rumour of all merchandising sales being the same, so the superstore £s aren't really benefitting the club So a boycott of merchandising would hit Dunwoody and not the club? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 21:46:12 » |
|
Who get's the advertising revenue?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonTownFC
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 21:46:35 » |
|
me
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27180
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 21:51:03 » |
|
So if this is true, Dunwoody aren't creditors?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonTownFC
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 21:51:25 » |
|
no they are cunts
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 22:16:41 » |
|
So if this is true, Dunwoody aren't creditors? They could still be creditors if, for example, they had invoiced the club for, say, consultancy services and not been paid for it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 22:17:50 » |
|
I was aware of something similar to this. I've heard rumour of all merchandising sales being the same, so the superstore £s aren't really benefitting the club So a boycott of merchandising would hit Dunwoody and not the club? Can't see how that would work with the merchandising tbh, but as for the programmes, if true then yes it would appear that a programme boycott would hit Dunwoody rather than the club. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mattboyslim
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 22:24:41 » |
|
Paul I'm guessing what i was told was a classic chinese whisper, starting with programmes and eveolving into all merchandise.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 22:27:20 » |
|
i get my programme's for free, in your face dunwoody!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonTownFC
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Saturday, December 2, 2006, 22:27:49 » |
|
i get my programme's for free, in your face dunwoody! SNAP!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
