Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: The CVA balls up and this forums reaction to it  (Read 10211 times)
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel

Offline Offline

Posts: 27180





Ignore
« Reply #75 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 08:13:16 »

Quote from: "red macca"
see i dont understand all this shit that is going on with the club.does diamindis have alot to do with dunwoody then.is sew link to diamindis anything to do with dunwoody

can someone explain the ins and outs for me.

maybe markd could answer these for me  Wink


Diamandis owns Dunwoody, he originally set up the compacy with ex-jockey Richard Dunwoody who has now pulled out. There was a story a while ago about Diamandis using the Dunwoody name without consent or something like that.

Dunwoody also provide our matchday programs, hence conflict of interest because not only does Diamandis effectively run STFC he is also a supplier to the club. Does anyone know if he/Dunwoody are a creditor in the CVA?
Logged
Mark D

Offline Offline

Posts: 85




Ignore
« Reply #76 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 12:43:25 »

Delta, football is all about opinions. When I was asked to give that testimonial I genuinely felt that way. At QPR, Dunwoody's design people helped to improve the programme dramatically, so much so that it won awards a couple of years running. Having looked at Swindon's programmes over the years, I do think the current STFC programme is a decent read and well presented. (Feel free to disagree).
Logged
mattboyslim

« Reply #77 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 12:52:07 »

I think thats pretty true, our programme is a decent read for the division, many teams at this level and the division above produce pretty mediocre poorly produced programmes, whereas depite the occasional glaring error in ours they quality of the content is OK, and perhaps about the only professional thing about the club in recent years
Logged
millom red

Offline Offline

Posts: 1588




Ignore
« Reply #78 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 18:58:18 »

Quote from: "Christy"
It's soul destroying that so few people are able to comprehend the whole sorry mess as 'grey' rather than a black v white opportunity to lob rocks at whoever they perceive as the other side....how many are waiting for a self-fulfilling prophecy, and an opportunity to blame someone else for killing STFC?

Much as I despair at the way STFC has been managed for what, ten years, I'm equally concerned at the Trust's capability to deliver anything better.

If the naive, provacative shite I read here really is an indication of what's to come, I'm scared.


Crikey Christy, give the trust some time! I dont see many other alternatives coming over the horizon! Do you?

Millom
Logged

f it dont need fixing....dont fuckin break it

Await The Day
deltaincline

« Reply #79 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 20:57:58 »

Quote from: "Mark D"
Delta, football is all about opinions. When I was asked to give that testimonial I genuinely felt that way. At QPR, Dunwoody's design people helped to improve the programme dramatically, so much so that it won awards a couple of years running. Having looked at Swindon's programmes over the years, I do think the current STFC programme is a decent read and well presented. (Feel free to disagree).


Fair point, and taken on board. My intention was not to highlight the fact that you may still think that way about dunwoody Wink

I agree with the comments today about the quality of our progs. Maybe Diamandis ought to stick to what he's good at, which is producing half-decent sports media publications.
Logged
Spencer_White

« Reply #80 on: Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 21:56:35 »

Quote from: "Lumps"
The wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round, round and round. The wheels on the bus go round and round, all day long
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: