|
Piemonte
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 11:26:11 » |
|
no way evans or brown 2 of our better players easily.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ben-STFC
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 11:32:48 » |
|
Hope we get a decent right back to jack smith was woeful saurday.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
 Offline
Posts: 16467
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 11:34:16 » |
|
Hope we get a decent right back to jack smith was woeful saurday
Yep. despite being our best player this season :? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
mastapeaka
Offline
Posts: 229
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 11:35:32 » |
|
Jack Smith - no way get rid of him, he's decent. Reminds me of Kerslake, nice and calm and controlled.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16467
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 11:37:26 » |
|
Methinks someone went to his first game on saturday
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 12:05:53 » |
|
smithy has done well this year.deffo one to keep
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Frigby Daser
Offline
Posts: 4173
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 12:13:06 » |
|
On Roberts, I'm not so sure....reckon Sturrock will be a fan. He says he wants his strikers to be his playmakers - so that means someone who's good in the air and can get flick ons (Peacock) and someone who's good with the ball at his feet and can put a good ball in the box (Roberts).
Saying that, he says its not rocket science where the changes need to be made....maybe he's talking left back and right wing. Maybe he's talking strikers....your guess is as good as mine.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57754
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 12:24:19 » |
|
Hope we get a decent right back to jack smith was woeful saurday. He was left exposed. Shakes had caught monkhouse-itus and kept pushing into the middle. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10189
Git facked
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 12:32:42 » |
|
Hope we get a decent right back to jack smith was woeful saurday. Jack Smith IS a decent right back. Easily one of our better players this season. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Stef Troll
Offline
Posts: 3161
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 12:45:33 » |
|
There will be changes, as i reckon Sturrock must feel that some of our players couldn't hack it in a higher league (eg) Roberts, Pook.
However the short term fix is to somehow accomodate our strikers in a formation where they can bloody score goals. Or, keep the current formation, but bring new strikers
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12320
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 14:05:29 » |
|
I'd expect twho grafters to come in and take the wide slots. He's a very direct style Manager and has already stated we won't be passing theball sideways. That mean someone like Brown or Shakes will be out first and replaced with a more combative wide midfielder. Maybe Shakes may hold his spot due to pace and abaility to defend. Probably a fair chance Vincent's place may come under threat as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 15:38:39 » |
|
Sturrock has said it aint a quick fix job here and changes will be made. Isn't that a complete contradiction? "No quick fix" and "changes will be made". No contradiction there as far as I can see mate! You've hardly cleared that up by repeating yourself. "No quick fix" would suggest that Sturrock isn't looking for a massive overhaul of the playing staff over the next few months, whereas "changes will be made" suggests otherwise. Of course, he could mean long-term changes.... just seemed a little contradictory at the time. But hey, if you've taken a direct quote from the horses mouth, who am i to argue. GO LUGGY!!!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
