we should be and are gratefull for the amounts of cash he has put into the club.but he's hardly skint is he.how many average fans make financial sacrifices to watch the town play.
Does that mean he should willing surrender his money to a wasteful club because he's wealthy?
I hate the attitude of some people towards those with money.
I know a wealthy person who had some damage done to some of his property by some drunk friends. They fell out over it because as far as they were concerned he was wealthy and it was acceptable to expect him to replace his stuff which he hasn't broken.
Anyway, who gives a fuck if Sir Seton is rich? His wealth is not there for our club, it's there for him to dispose of as he feels fit. If he decides he wants to waste some on our club, then thats his prerogative and i thank him for it.
(Despite the tone of the above arriba, this is not directed at you personally, just me finding a point to chew on.
)
But back to your original question. Has Sir Seton put more of his disposible income into stfc than the average supporter has?
Probably not, but then why should he? Besides, we can't actually prove anything as we
know very little, if anything.
We certainly do not even know if the money which goes to Swindon is classed as disposible?
Afterall the club is no "asset". Technically it's a liability. This liablity needs servicing like any debt, so i'm sure SSW would be looking for tax advantages to help service the debt which is our club. I'm sure most the money we receive will be on a gross basis and come through companies.
