sonic youth
|
 |
« on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 21:16:56 » |
|
Early days yet but first impressions count for a lot so let's have a quick poll...
It's got to be Evo for me, absolutely immense and has been a huge influence already. Ifil's a close second which is a remarkable feat in itself.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 21:19:08 » |
|
Ifil just sneaks it for me
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33884
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 21:23:42 » |
|
The Beast has been mega impressive, but then I knew he had him in it and it hasnt come as any surprise.
Similiar to Roberts, he's been alot better than prevous seasons but again, its nothing I wasnt expecting.
Evans, had a good reputation before he got here. He looked mega lost and off the pace against Reading but since then he's lived up to his past. Again he's been brilliant but not unexpected.
Brezovan has exceeded my expectations the most, obviously knowing nothing about him and the like, plus he didnt look anything overally special in pre-season.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 21:24:31 » |
|
Who voted for Shakes?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 22:08:34 » |
|
im going to say evans because initial impressions were that he was going to be fat and rubbish and he has played well.
Ifil on the otherhand we know is good and has just eventually pulled his finger out.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 22:16:50 » |
|
Who voted for Shakes? stfclady probably, she loves him
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10188
Git facked
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 22:22:22 » |
|
Ifil by a mile.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 22:30:47 » |
|
evans, with ifil a closes second
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PHIL!!!!
Our Resident Emo Kid
Offline
Posts: 1953
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 22:51:29 » |
|
There's no Curtis Weston on the list?
I voted for Peacock anyway - Purely because he's been outstanding, as expected. Shame he hasn't scored many, but maybe thats a good thing in a way, as he creates plenty of goal scoring oppotunities, he's a real menace and it means other clubs may not try to take him off us, as he isn't a prolific goalscorer...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 22:52:06 » |
|
that's because it cut some names off
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 22:56:04 » |
|
There's no Curtis Weston on the list?
I voted for Peacock anyway - Purely because he's been outstanding, as expected. Shame he hasn't scored many, but maybe thats a good thing in a way, as he creates plenty of goal scoring oppotunities, he's a real menace and it means other clubs may not try to take him off us, as he isn't a prolific goalscorer... #dare i say, for all the effort peacock aint that great!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33884
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 22:59:58 » |
|
I think he is good at what he does, he isnt an out and out striker.
He still drops too deep for my liking.
He gets the ball and holds it up, but I find he has to go back towards the midfield to pass it, rather than the midfield breaking forward towards him to get the ball...if that makes sense
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21305
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: Sunday, August 27, 2006, 23:02:44 » |
|
I think he is good at what he does, he isnt an out and out striker.
He still drops too deep for my liking.
He gets the ball and holds it up, but I find he has to go back towards the midfield to pass it, rather than the midfield breaking forward towards him to get the ball...if that makes sense so does roberts but he is a better player.i like peacock, but would like another decent forward to be brought in.think he will drift away when it comes to the crunch myself
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tails
Offline
Posts: 10188
Git facked
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: Monday, August 28, 2006, 00:19:35 » |
|
There's no Curtis Weston on the list?
I voted for Peacock anyway - Purely because he's been outstanding, as expected. Shame he hasn't scored many, but maybe thats a good thing in a way, as he creates plenty of goal scoring oppotunities, he's a real menace and it means other clubs may not try to take him off us, as he isn't a prolific goalscorer... #dare i say, for all the effort peacock aint that great! We haven't had a striker that holds the ball up as well as Peacock since Wayne Allison, although Peacock will never have a scoring record as good as the chief he'll make double figures and that's enough for me.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Luci
Offline
Posts: 10862
Fatbury's Stalker
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: Monday, August 28, 2006, 00:50:48 » |
|
Who voted for Shakes? stfclady probably, she loves him In this instance it was in fact not me Just cause hes my favourite player doesnt mean I think hes the best 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|