Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Pluto loses staus as a planet  (Read 1770 times)
flammableBen

« Reply #15 on: Thursday, August 24, 2006, 22:09:53 »

It's been classed as a 'dwarf-planet' I think. Along with Ceres which is relatively much closer, making up a 1/3 of the mass of the main asteroid belt between mars and jupiter.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #16 on: Thursday, August 24, 2006, 23:23:52 »

Quote from: "STFCBird"
I just saw a shooting star, maybe it was pluto dying


 I saw two shooting stars last night
I wished on them but they were only satellites
Is it wrong to wish on space hardware
I wish, i wish, i wish you'd care.
Logged
sonic youth

« Reply #17 on: Thursday, August 24, 2006, 23:30:52 »

me and kat do a beautiful duet of that song.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #18 on: Thursday, August 24, 2006, 23:35:59 »

Quote from: "sonic youth"
me and kat do a beautiful duet of that song.
Cool
Logged
Ben Wah Balls

Offline Offline

Posts: 5972




Ignore
« Reply #19 on: Thursday, August 24, 2006, 23:54:40 »

Is this the beginning of the apocalypse? How long before earth is no longer a planet. I've always been told there were 9 planets and now they tell me it's all lies. I don't think I can believe anything any more.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #20 on: Friday, August 25, 2006, 00:02:10 »

Quote from: "Ben Wah Balls"
Is this the beginning of the apocalypse? How long before earth is no longer a planet. I've always been told there were 9 planets and now they tell me it's all lies. I don't think I can believe anything any more.


 Happily my 1964 Patrick Moore book, Astronomy  pointed out that Pluto's status was to say the least curious.....either a rogue satellite of Neptune or an object, effected by something as yet undiscovered in the Kuyper Belt.

 So this doesn't altogether arrive as a surprise to me.
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #21 on: Friday, August 25, 2006, 00:05:21 »

Think it was a close call between saying it was a planet and reclassifying lot's of others. they decided against that because the clever scientist people reckoned we could end up with about 50 planets.

It should never have been remained a planet for so long anyway. One of the reasons it did is because it was the only one discovered by an american and they get a bit upset about stuff like that.
Logged
flammableBen

« Reply #22 on: Friday, August 25, 2006, 00:07:00 »

hmm.. are posts have similar points but form different angles mr smeeton. I was always taught that pluto's status as a planet was dubious(sp?) at best. I just took ages to type my last response.
Logged
Reg Smeeton
Walking Encyclopaedia

Offline Offline

Posts: 34913





Ignore
« Reply #23 on: Friday, August 25, 2006, 00:21:25 »

Quote from: "flammableBen"
Think it was a close call between saying it was a planet and reclassifying lot's of others. they decided against that because the clever scientist people reckoned we could end up with about 50 planets.

It should never have been remained a planet for so long anyway. One of the reasons it did is because it was the only one discovered by an american and they get a bit upset about stuff like that.


 Yep Percival Lowell's (he of canals on Mars) observatory at Flagstaff Arizona....Don't forget Winona, Kingman, Barstow, San Bernardino.
Logged
Ben Wah Balls

Offline Offline

Posts: 5972




Ignore
« Reply #24 on: Friday, August 25, 2006, 01:59:36 »

Fair enough if it was discovered by an american, it was clearly a shit planet all along. Thank fuck it's gone. Watch out neptune though, they'll be coming for you next.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: