Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Sky HD  (Read 2752 times)
SwindonTownFC

« on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 15:35:17 »

any got this sky HD? is it worth getting?
Logged
farmer geoff

« Reply #1 on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 15:53:08 »

seems a bit pricey for the channels that are currently available for HD
Logged
SwindonTownFC

« Reply #2 on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 15:53:38 »

whats the cost?
Logged
farmer geoff

« Reply #3 on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 15:56:20 »

dont quote me but i think its a tenner a month, where as sky plus is free with 2 premium channels
Logged
blinkpip
His Infernal Majesty

Offline Offline

Posts: 6761



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 15:59:09 »

Do you have to buy a HD TV and a new Sky box?
Logged

ee the trick is only pick on those that can't do you no harm
Like the drummer from Def Leppard's only got one arm

I annoyed Yeovilred 28/01/06
farmer geoff

« Reply #5 on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 16:04:06 »

yes you do need a HD ready TV
Logged
The Grim Reaper

Offline Offline

Posts: 1780





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 16:35:58 »

1/ You will need a HD compatible TV to reap the benefit. Expect to pay anything from £699 up depending on size and make.

2/ Sky will charge you £299 for a HD box. If you already subscribe to Sky its still £299.

3/ On top of your monthly subscription to Sky you will have to pay an additional £10 a month for HD content currently just 8 channels. So if you have the Sky World package its about £55 a month.


  If you want my advce then.....WAIT.

NTL and Telewest have just merged and have been aquired by Virgin Group. They are already running HD over their cable network in some Telewest areas and early indications are very favourable according to variable sources.  From what I have read somewhere, NTL/Telewest will relaunch its cable service early 2007 under the name 'Virgin Vision' offering a quad service of HDTV, Broadband, phone and mobile.  Now i'm the first to admit that in the past NTL have been pretty shit but lets be honest, have you ever seen Richard Branson make a pigs ear of anything?

  And its a good excuse to not give my hard earned cash to that robbing git that is Rupert Murdoch.
Logged
hansgruber

Offline Offline

Posts: 1606




Ignore
« Reply #7 on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 16:37:40 »

Quote

have you ever seen Richard Branson make a pigs ear of anything?


I'm not that impressed with Virgin trains to be honest, but generally I think you're right
Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Online Online

Posts: 57960





Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 17:01:28 »

Just to clarify, the £10 a month gives you the HD channels appropriate to your current package. So for example if you don't have the movies (or sport) your £10 will NOT get you the HD movie (or sport) channels.

So the extra £10 is up to HD  8 channels. And not all content on these channels are true HD but are 'pscaled' to the HD format by Sky.

Personally I think if you  are happy with what you have the 'step up'  to HD is not worth the extra. I am certainly holding off until that £10 is dropped or substantially more HD content is available. The demos I have seen haven't blown me away. Then again that was in Comet/Dixons, I doubt the staff can tie their shoe laces let alone set up a HD demo properly.

If you already have a HD ready TV or intend to get a large screen (36" or more) then maybe it's worth it.
Logged
Onion_Jimbo

Offline Offline

Posts: 2369





Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 17:42:04 »

i was wondering if this is worth it. apparently it makes football better. like looking at it through a window!
Logged

Rigobert Song La la la
Spud

« Reply #10 on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 18:20:20 »

Quote from: "blinkpip"
Do you have to buy a HD TV and a new Sky box?


 

It would beat the whole concept if you didnt have a HD TV.

The Sky HD Box is £299.99, how do they make a profit?.  :shock:
Logged
SwindonStevo

« Reply #11 on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 18:59:13 »

im not really arsed about it in the least if im honest, quite happy with it the way it is at the moment.

The only thing thats fucking anoying is sky sports have to point out every single fucking programme is on HD1 or HD2. Yes we get the fucking picture we can get it in HD now fuck off.

rant over
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21305





Ignore
« Reply #12 on: Sunday, August 13, 2006, 19:37:31 »

a mate of mine has it,its good but i aint gonna fork out on a new tv and an extra subscription for a little better clarity.
it is good, but unless you have spare cash dont bother.if you do then do it
Logged
Barry Scott

Offline Offline

Posts: 9135




« Reply #13 on: Monday, August 14, 2006, 10:46:45 »

I've seen HD and wow, great picture, but as far as i'm concerned it seems to much.

I mean, who the fuck needs to see blades of grass during football matches?

I can't ever recall watching TV and wishing i could see something more clearly, as least to that degree.

Seems a load of pointless shit to me. Lots of people are yet to even step up to Digital? With a good TV, i feel Digital is about as good as is required.
Logged
janaage
People's Front of Alba

Offline Offline

Posts: 14825





Ignore
« Reply #14 on: Monday, August 14, 2006, 11:15:31 »

Fuck me I've only just got a 'puter and broadband at home, fuck going out and getting this shit.

Is the picture really that amazing???  Any shops in town have demo's of it?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Print
Jump to: