Spencer_White
|
 |
« on: Sunday, July 30, 2006, 09:39:36 » |
|
?? Must have been spening time with Trundle.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
blinkpip
His Infernal Majesty
Offline
Posts: 6761
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Sunday, July 30, 2006, 11:00:12 » |
|
?  I don't get it?
|
|
|
Logged
|
ee the trick is only pick on those that can't do you no harm Like the drummer from Def Leppard's only got one arm
I annoyed Yeovilred 28/01/06
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27180
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: Sunday, July 30, 2006, 11:08:19 » |
|
Nor me 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: Sunday, July 30, 2006, 11:10:43 » |
|
?  I don't get it? *TEF Disclaimer* Spencer forgot the © in the thread title, please don't sue Whits for this oversight... (see the OS for yesterdays team sheet blinkers)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
STFC_Manc
Offline
Posts: 1680
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: Sunday, July 30, 2006, 11:59:16 » |
|
i c now
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57753
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: Sunday, July 30, 2006, 14:20:36 » |
|
When I asked that last week I was toldy you can't copywright a name.
Hope this helps on saving you the cost of a stamp in seeking expressed written permission to use his name.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9737
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: Sunday, July 30, 2006, 15:39:22 » |
|
golly that's a laugh riot
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water. And this is the well. Drink full and descend. The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
Sussex
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: Sunday, July 30, 2006, 15:42:04 » |
|
golly that's a laugh riot Shut up.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
Offline
Posts: 9737
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: Sunday, July 30, 2006, 20:35:15 » |
|
golly that's a laugh riot Shut up. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water. And this is the well. Drink full and descend. The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: Sunday, July 30, 2006, 23:13:34 » |
|
there's no official process for copywriting stuff in this country. If you create something then you own the copyright to it automatically. You can Trademark names though
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: Monday, July 31, 2006, 00:08:48 » |
|
There are things you can do to bolster your claim in the event of a dispute tho - dunno if it still applies but there always used to be (up to early 90s at least) as semi-official thing of sending a copy of written works to the Bodleian and the British Library as a way of "registering" copyright.
Christ, I'm sending myself to sleep here
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flammableBen
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: Monday, July 31, 2006, 00:15:04 » |
|
From what I remember it's about proving that you wrote something on a certain date. I think that posting something to yourself with registered post and not opening it is a classic way of doing it. I don't really know to be honest.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: Monday, July 31, 2006, 09:35:42 » |
|
From what I remember it's about proving that you wrote something on a certain date. I think that posting something to yourself with registered post and not opening it is a classic way of doing it. I don't really know to be honest. [©] Yep. Authors and scriptwriters etc.. send copies of their work to themselves in case there idea get's nicked. They can then prove when they wrote it. [/©]
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: Monday, July 31, 2006, 10:37:07 » |
|
But that wouldn't prove anything other than that they'd sent themselves a letter/package on such and such a date. It would prove nothing about the contents of the package (which is what they're trying to protect). That's why the Bodleian/British Library thing is/was used - as then they can point to the Library Catalog to establish it existed from at least that time (that it was catalogued)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: Monday, July 31, 2006, 10:46:13 » |
|
If a case of 'you nicked my idea' went to court, the package can be opened in front of a judge to prove that what's inside (the authors work), was written at said date.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|