Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
 Offline
Posts: 9048
|
 |
« on: Saturday, July 22, 2006, 08:25:28 » |
|
Sky Sports News have just reported he is now likely to leave Wolves...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ginginho
Offline
Posts: 6969
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Saturday, July 22, 2006, 08:33:53 » |
|
Would rather have Zola  Still, if it is true, I will be pleased. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reeves4england
Offline
Posts: 16121
We'll never die!
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Saturday, July 22, 2006, 08:55:42 » |
|
Lets face it Zola is very unlikely!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33884
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Saturday, July 22, 2006, 10:46:55 » |
|
why do we need Paul Ince?!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kinky Tom
Snow Master Sandwich King.
Offline
Posts: 9048
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Saturday, July 22, 2006, 10:51:15 » |
|
Not saying we do, just providing more ammunition for those on the side of the fence that are trying to convince themselves he's a possibility.
If he were to be on his way I wouldn't complain, he'd be useful. Course I'd rather we signed Boland given that he's only 30...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33884
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Saturday, July 22, 2006, 10:52:25 » |
|
I just dont see the point in signing Paul Ince when we have Dennis Wise, surely they are a very similiar type of player....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12320
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Saturday, July 22, 2006, 11:04:55 » |
|
I just dont see the point in signing Paul Ince when we have Dennis Wise, surely they are a very similiar type of player.... In think Wise will spend a fair chunk of the season in the dugout though. I like the people who claim they don't want Ince because he's shit. Has everyone forgot what league we are in and what level of quality we had/have in central midfield? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sonic youth
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Saturday, July 22, 2006, 12:38:57 » |
|
why do we need Paul Ince?! because it looks increasingly unlikely that wise is going to play at all this season |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36334
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Saturday, July 22, 2006, 20:47:14 » |
|
why do we need Paul Ince?! Why don't we need him?! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
 Online
Posts: 15069
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Saturday, July 22, 2006, 20:48:57 » |
|
Ince or Pook?  ? Hmmmmmmmmm :? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Danjackson10
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Sunday, July 23, 2006, 08:28:17 » |
|
Ince or Pook? ? Hmmmmmmmmm :? Case closed! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
farmer geoff
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Sunday, July 23, 2006, 11:05:46 » |
|
Ince or Pook? ? Hmmmmmmmmm :? Case closed! Ince or pook? ?? Wise and Ince!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
@MacPhlea
Offline
Posts: 2325
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 10:35:20 » |
|
No other reason for the adver to run this report...
New Wolves boss Mick McCarthy has made Paul Ince's contract situation a priority upon his arrival at Molineux.
Veteran midfielder Ince was discussing a new playing contract with Wolves at the time of previous manager Glenn Hoddle's departure and must now decide where his future lies. Ince, 38, was keen to replace Hoddle, but McCarthy was chosen ahead of him.
McCarthy, who has been appointed on a 12-month rolling contract, said: "I have not had a chance to speak to Paul yet but it sounds like he may have had other offers.’’
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OOH! SHAUN TAYLOR
- FACT!
Online
Posts: 15069
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 10:58:10 » |
|
"I have not had a chance to speak to Paul yet but it sounds like he may have had other offers.’’ So it looks like we're definitely going to sign Paul Ince then. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sussex
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday, July 25, 2006, 11:02:20 » |
|
Confirmation from johno will hopefully be posted shortly  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
