singingiiiffy
Offline
Posts: 2911
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:09:18 » |
|
I'd rather have someone with less talent but better physique and work rate. ridiculas! youd rather a striker with better physique and work rate than a goal scorer (which weve got)? i dont give a fuck about curetons physique if hes scores loads. hes small and thats the end of it. its as if you expect him to beat peter crouch with a header. work rate. nothing iv seen of cureton to suggest that he doesnt work hard. the only reason people find a hatred for cureton is because of his comments about wanting to leave for a higher division and for missing nearly a sitter a game in the last games of the season. every striker misses sitters but any fool can see cureton in league 2 in a swindon shirt will be very good for us.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:09:55 » |
|
I'm sure they'd be in their 20's now. Still going to be mingey though unless there has been some serious investment in plastic surgery 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12322
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:10:24 » |
|
Spuddy, hate to burst your bubble, but selling alcohol in the TE would be illegal and as I sit next to an ex Robeinette at work, I can confirm they have no plans to come out of retirement. why? Licensing laws prohibit the sale of alcohol to be consumed in area within sight of the pitch. Because the only spot in the TE which is enclosed is the little shack thing pretending to be a footstand, there isn't anywhere for people to stay with a beer. Only football that this law exists, all other sporting occasions you can drink within sight of the pitch. Another hangover from the ugly days. It took long enough to get the sale permitted in grounds at all I think. Can't sell it in Stratton Bank either.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33905
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:10:34 » |
|
ha...me and my mates nearly beat up one of the old robinettes once...
This short ugly, big puffa jackted dark hat wearing person came up behind my mate Rob then put his arms around him and into his jacket pockets.
We thought he was being mugged, no it was just his new girlfriend Sam....who had a skinhead!?!
She then got arrested for driving down the wrong side of the road with no tax & insurance and ending up in somes garden... :shock:
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RobertT
Offline
Posts: 12322
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:11:38 » |
|
I'm sure they'd be in their 20's now. Still going to be mingey though unless there has been some serious investment in plastic surgery  Actually, the one I sit next to is quite nice. Maybe they just blossomed once through puberty?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33905
Joseph McLaughlin
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:11:55 » |
|
I'd rather have someone with less talent but better physique and work rate. i dont give a fuck about curetons physique if hes scores loads. but he doesnt score loads, NEXT!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:14:12 » |
|
I'd rather have someone with less talent but better physique and work rate. ridiculas! youd rather a striker with better physique and work rate than a goal scorer (which weve got)? i dont give a fuck about curetons physique if hes scores loads. hes small and thats the end of it. its as if you expect him to beat peter crouch with a header. work rate. nothing iv seen of cureton to suggest that he doesnt work hard. the only reason people find a hatred for cureton is because of his comments about wanting to leave for a higher division and for missing nearly a sitter a game in the last games of the season. every striker misses sitters but any fool can see cureton in league 2 in a swindon shirt will be very good for us. I stand by my points. His lack of height and strength makes him a totally one dimensional player. Allbeit that the dimension he does have he is quite good at (does that make sense?) I'm also not so sure I'd classify him as a "goalscorer" At times this season he took the harder chances whilst missing the easy ones. he's a flair player more than a goalscorer. I've no hatred for Cureton, and like you say I think he would score goals given service in L2. But I think we could well be a better TEAM without him.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kevjoycreed
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:15:03 » |
|
I'd rather have someone with less talent but better physique and work rate. i dont give a fuck about curetons physique if hes scores loads. but he doesnt score loads, NEXT! Neither does Peacock :box:
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:16:50 » |
|
I'd rather have someone with less talent but better physique and work rate. i dont give a fuck about curetons physique if hes scores loads. but he doesnt score loads, NEXT! Neither does Peacock :box: but peacock actually challenges for the ball and puts himself about unlike the feotal one. I.E. he offers something for the team
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Amir
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:24:59 » |
|
I don't dislike Cureton and I think he's the kind of player who will always miss twice as many sitters as he scores(something that obviously became more apparent in a team that created very few chances). Even so I think the writing is on the wall for him and he should go.
Some good ideas there piemonte, maybe legalise weed in the town end as well and install me a reclining comfy chair. Keep Ifil though yeah :winking:
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
santini
Offline
Posts: 890
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:49:05 » |
|
4. Leave off .. Jerel would be a good sweeper ... But you need to read the game and make decisions as a sweeper. Ifil has enough to do trying to recover from his own mistakes in both the above 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:52:47 » |
|
he is fast and a good tackler ... I think Ifil is better than most people think
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Piemonte
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:55:03 » |
|
Some good ideas there piemonte, maybe legalise weed in the town end as well and install me a reclining comfy chair. Keep Ifil though yeah :winking:
sound points there Amir  other then the Ifill one :x
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
santini
Offline
Posts: 890
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:55:07 » |
|
he is fast and a good tackler True, but often in the wrong place/time.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: Monday, May 15, 2006, 12:55:19 » |
|
4. Leave off .. Jerel would be a good sweeper ... But you need to read the game and make decisions as a sweeper. Ifil has enough to do trying to recover from his own mistakes in both the above  i think you will find ifil is recovering from other peoples mistakes.(then he makes his)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|