LucienSanchez
Offline
Posts: 5193
Is this hospital called St. Croc of Shit?!
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 15:29:15 » |
|
Considering it wasn't career threatening, like some of the near leg breakers we see quite regularly, it is harsh. But I guess being bitten isn't your usual football hazard, whereas being on the end of a two-footed lunge is par for the course.
|
|
|
Logged
|
We made a promise we swore we'd always remember... no retreat, baby, no surrender
|
|
|
No Longer Posh Red
Not Posh any more!
Offline
Posts: 8126
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 15:40:57 » |
|
Having been banned for 7 games for doing the same thing before, they could hardly make it less.
|
|
|
Logged
|
STFC 4 Arsenal 3, the best birthday present ever
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 20:06:08 » |
|
Having been banned for 7 games for doing the same thing before, they could hardly make it less.
Think this is what did for him. The FA would have looked right twats if they were seen as more lenient than the Dutch. Disappointed with the statement from Liverpool, seems they still haven't learnt from the fiasco around the racism case.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RedRag
Offline
Posts: 3501
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 20:22:24 » |
|
No one's going to sack a multi million pound player but Liverpool should have banned him for 5 games themselves and fined him - instead they continue to prefer to trash their own reputation with their pathetic backing of their own players. How difficult is it not to bite an opponent?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
Offline
Posts: 23568
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 20:27:05 » |
|
I realise that Liverpool are not the only club that would do this, but this tribalism bollocks really fucks me off. Of course he deserves to be banned, and he was never going to get anything shorter than what he did last time. Frankly as a second offense for biting and the second time in a year he's been in serious disciplinary trouble he's lucky it isn't 10 months.
I don't care how exquisitely talented you are (and he is) you can't just be a total psychopath. A bad tackle is clearly to be frowned upon but will occasionally happen in football from clumsiness. Biting someone unprovoked is just ludicrous and needs an exemplary punishment.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 20:30:09 » |
|
Knocking the little fuckers teeth out with a stray elbow would do the job fine....like to see him try gumming Terry at Stamford Bridge.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Gibbons
Offline
Posts: 1110
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 20:49:35 » |
|
To those who say, "but 'x' did a career threatening challenge and only got a 5 game ban" I would say this:
Person A commits one crime, a pretty serious one, but has an otherwise unblemished record and he gets 5 years.
Person B is frequently in trouble, nothing too awful and nothing as bad as person A, but he keeps getting the odd six months here and year there, but despite being given countless chances just does not seem to learn or change his ways. Eventually he does the courts lose patience and throw the book at him and give him 10 years.
Is it wrong person B got a longer sentence than person A? Personally, I don's think so.
In summary, I think they should burn the cunt at the stake, but only after pulling all his fingernails out.
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's not that I'm lazy. It's that I just don't care.
|
|
|
No Longer Posh Red
Not Posh any more!
Offline
Posts: 8126
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 20:58:06 » |
|
In some ways I hope Liverpool appeal against the ban, and that they add a few more games for a frivolous appeal.
|
|
|
Logged
|
STFC 4 Arsenal 3, the best birthday present ever
|
|
|
DMR
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 21:28:19 » |
|
To those who say, "but 'x' did a career threatening challenge and only got a 5 game ban" I would say this:
Person A commits one crime, a pretty serious one, but has an otherwise unblemished record and he gets 5 years.
Person B is frequently in trouble, nothing too awful and nothing as bad as person A, but he keeps getting the odd six months here and year there, but despite being given countless chances just does not seem to learn or change his ways. Eventually he does the courts lose patience and throw the book at him and give him 10 years.
Is it wrong person B got a longer sentence than person A? Personally, I don's think so.
In summary, I think they should burn the cunt at the stake, but only after pulling all his fingernails out.
It's football not the streets stop being a melodramatic cunt
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Gibbons
Offline
Posts: 1110
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 21:57:06 » |
|
It's football not the streets stop being a melodramatic cunt
Fuck off you cock juggling thunder cunt, I wasn't being melodramatic but merely observing that multiple offences are worthy of a more severe punishment than a single infraction.
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's not that I'm lazy. It's that I just don't care.
|
|
|
carbonwhite
Offline
Posts: 1939
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: Thursday, April 25, 2013, 00:58:38 » |
|
im surprised the fucker doesnt get in more trouble outside football
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bukkake Regiment
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: Thursday, April 25, 2013, 01:05:09 » |
|
I doubt he goes out in public much here. The man is hated by half the country.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
carbonwhite
Offline
Posts: 1939
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: Thursday, April 25, 2013, 01:07:13 » |
|
That's only because the other half doesnt really care
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Anteater
Offline
Posts: 1191
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: Thursday, April 25, 2013, 10:59:22 » |
|
Ban is fine but the the FA missed a trick here. What is required after this is the confirmed safety of other players, the ridicule and punishment of Suarez sufficient to deter him from doing it again, and entertainment of the football watching public.... so why not just make him wear a Hannibal Lecter mask for the whole of next season ?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|