Title: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Nemo on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 13:39:48 A game that will live long in the memory.
Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 13:48:46 Can we scrap the "none of the above"? The whole back 3 were pretty much faultless and Smith did his job well,unlucky to have a goal chalked off. Freckles edges it for me. Sobo impressive latterly
Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Lemis on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 13:50:48 No one did anything really to stand out. A clean sheet, so arguably has to be someone in the defence, Hall was in the middle of it, so he's my choice, not that there is anything seperating him from the other two either side of him
Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 13:51:20 Can we scrap the "none of the above"? The whole back 3 were pretty much faultless and Smith did his job well,unlucky to have a goal chalked off. Freckles edges it for me. Sobo impressive latterly Why scrap it? Games like Chesterfield it’s a more than valid option. Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Lemis on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 13:52:23 Why scrap it? Games like Chesterfield it’s a more than valid option. +1 for keeping Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 13:54:26 Why scrap it? Games like Chesterfield it’s a more than valid option. Because of today? If you don't think anyone's worthy,don't vote. To say nobody deserved it today is bafflingTitle: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Cowley38 on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 13:55:40 Can we scrap the "none of the above"? The whole back 3 were pretty much faultless and Smith did his job well,unlucky to have a goal chalked off. Freckles edges it for me. Sobo impressive latterly To say they were pretty much faultless is stretching reality a fair bit, they were OK compared to last week, but Crewe forwards were really shite!! Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 13:55:56 Why scrap it? Games like Chesterfield it’s a more than valid option. Really, Wright was superb that nightTitle: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 13:57:37 To say they were pretty much faultless is stretching reality a fair bit, they were OK compared to last week, but Crewe forwards were really shite!! To be fair, I don't recall anyone fucking up todayTitle: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Quagmire on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 14:00:01 Really, Wright was superb that night I meant Walsall, But still, if more fans don’t think anyone warrants a vote so go for none of the above, surely that’s a fairer reflection than only a few voting and someone then getting a MOTM when most fans disagree? Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Nemo on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 14:03:19 I spent two seasons telling people I wasn't adding none of the above midseason and I'm not removing it midseason either.
Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 14:04:45 I meant Walsall, Not really. Clearly, the fewer the overall votes the more dissatisfied the fans are . But it's only my opinion. But still, if more fans don’t think anyone warrants a vote so go for none of the above, surely that’s a fairer reflection than only a few voting and someone then getting a MOTM when most fans disagree? Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Steak supper on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 14:13:49 Please retain ' none of the above '
Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 14:17:02 I spent two seasons telling people I wasn't adding none of the above midseason and I'm not removing it midseason either. Fair enough,just my opinion. I'm not precious about it. Carry on, some people will be delighted if NOTA wins player of the year🙂Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Nomoreheroes on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 14:27:27 Smith had a good first half but the ball went to him less and less in the second
Freckleton scares me. e.g. Can't pass to our players, nearly rebounded it off a useless CF when clearing across the box and got caught out giving away a dangerous freekick (both in the second half). King looks non league. The U17 lad we played at the end of last season looks better. I think we started to pass and move forward down the right when Sobowale and Ofoborh came on. Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Cowley38 on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 14:30:35 Smith had a good first half but the ball went to him less and less in the second Freckleton scares me. e.g. Can't pass to our players, nearly rebounded it off a useless CF when clearing across the box and got caught out giving away a dangerous freekick (both in the second half). King looks non league. The U17 lad we played at the end of last season looks better. I think we started to pass and move forward down the right when Sobowale and Ofoborh came on. But Adje said all the defence were near faultless King and Longelo cannot defend, Freckleton is not a centre back. Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Batch on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 14:32:02 Freckleton and Smith.
Flip a coin The defence are nowhere near as solid as I thought they'd bev yet. Can't agree with adje there. We didn't concede but Crewe certainly had us opened up on a fair few occasions. We aren't defending high balls as dominant as I thought we would either. I'm saying we played 5 at the back. I thought the central 3 mainly did ok. Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: jayohaitchenn on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 14:50:07 It was between Smith and Wright for me - so I went with Wright as we kept a clean sheet but didn't score.
Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 15:03:20 But Adje said all the defence were near faultless Defence = back 3. We don't play full backsKing and Longelo cannot defend, Freckleton is not a centre back. Freckleton and Smith. When I say defence I mean back 3. Don't remember them getting the better of us in the air back there to be honestFlip a coin The defence are nowhere near as solid as I thought they'd bev yet. Can't agree with adje there. We didn't concede but Crewe certainly had us opened up on a fair few occasions. We aren't defending high balls as dominant as I thought we would either. I'm saying we played 5 at the back. I thought the central 3 mainly did ok. Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Cowley38 on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 15:04:44 Defence = back 3. We don't play full backsWhen I say defence I mean back 3. Don't remember them getting the better of us in the air back there King and Longelo are wingbacks they still have to defend!! Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 15:17:13 King and Longelo are wingbacks they still have to defend!! True, but they're not solely defenders Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 15:27:01 But Adje said all the defence were near faultless Blimey, it's just my opinion not gospel! After last week's error strewn defending, the back 3 improved 100% and yeah they were pretty much( not entirely)faultless I thoughtTitle: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Cowley38 on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 15:30:17 Blimey, it's just my opinion not gospel! After last week's error strewn defending, the back 3 improved 100% and yeah they were pretty much( not entirely)faultless I thought Jesus I was being humerous!! Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 15:33:49 Jesus I was being humerous!! Me tooTitle: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 15:34:52 I meant Walsall, But still, if more fans don’t think anyone warrants a vote so go for none of the above, surely that’s a fairer reflection than only a few voting and someone then getting a MOTM when most fans disagree? Ah,ok. But even then Bycroft had a belter! Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: UTR on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 15:49:44 Yeah another +1 for none of the above being kept. It’s better balance for seasons like last season and the first few games of this season where needed. If we’re going to be turgid then I’d rather not give out a “best of a bad bunch” man of the match vote unless it’s actually deserved like Kemp a few times last season
Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: No Longer Posh Red on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 15:54:23 If you’re going to have a NOTA I’d change it to “They were all shite”
Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 16:01:51 Yeah another +1 for none of the above being kept. It’s better balance for seasons like last season and the first few games of this season where needed. If we’re going to be turgid then I’d rather not give out a “best of a bad bunch” man of the match vote unless it’s actually deserved like Kemp a few times last season So 9 votes today for NOTA today is a fair reflection? Ok, so they were all shite?Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: UTR on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 16:05:23 So 9 votes today for NOTA today is a fair reflection? Ok, so they were all shite? If people want to vote that way, that’s their choice Title: Re: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Batch on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 16:09:45 Defence = back 3. We don't play full backsWhen I say defence I mean back 3. Don't remember them getting the better of us in the air back there to be honest Ah well that'll explain it then. Personally I think setting backs are part of the defence, but we can argue that until the cows come home Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Jimmy Quinn on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 16:12:51 Let’s get back to basics, 4,4,2 which includes fullbacks, wingers and two up front…..
Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 16:14:51 If people want to vote that way, that’s their choice TrueTitle: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: adje on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 16:16:25 Let’s get back to basics, 4,4,2 which includes fullbacks, wingers and two up front….. Well,I'm all for that at this levelTitle: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Jimmy Quinn on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 16:17:18 Well,I'm all for that at this level Exactly, players aren’t technically good enough to copy the elite teams. Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: newmarket red on Saturday, August 24, 2024, 16:21:01 None of them deserve it so i think the tea lady should get it.
Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Pookemon on Sunday, August 25, 2024, 00:40:19 Can we scrap the "none of the above"? The whole back 3 were pretty much faultless and Smith did his job well,unlucky to have a goal chalked off. Freckles edges it for me. Sobo impressive latterly I like sumowhale, surprised he's not played more as looks like a proper wingback. That said the defence were not faultless. It was 2 abject teams failing to show any quality. The passing was awful, either hoofball or scared ball and alot of needless free kicks given away.Noone stood out today, it was just shite. A lackluster point was the only positive. Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: Peter Venkman on Sunday, August 25, 2024, 09:54:21 Smith for me, hes all elbows and wins more than he loses, the trouble is we dont send enough decent balls his way, he will score 20 this season with better crosses played to him.
Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: normy on Sunday, August 25, 2024, 17:01:08 Smith for me, hes all elbows and wins more than he loses, the trouble is we dont send enough decent balls his way, he will score 20 this season with better crosses played to him. Agreed. I liked Khan, and wondered if he would have worked better with this better defence we've got now. I would like to know the full story and reason behind his absence, I've probably missed the relevant information. Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: McGurk's Missus on Monday, August 26, 2024, 17:55:03 Fair enough,just my opinion. I'm not precious about it. Carry on, some people will be delighted if NOTA wins player of the year🙂 It could be argued the POTY is a bit of a different voting animal, compared to POTM. Where regular POTM winners might correlate with them standing a good chance of winning POTY, this award often has voting bounds beyond just the activities on the pitch. A POTY might also do shitloads of community and fan engagement, maybe does visits and appearances beyond the minimum, invests in local charities and initiatives or is just a really bloody lovely bloke et al; someone like Michael Doughty {who was both good on and off the pitch}. Depending on what individual players do throughout the season both on the pic and off the pitch, I would imagine that some would at least manage to do a bit more than NOTA off the pitch - it is the hope that kills us though of course ::) Title: Re: Crewe v Swindon MotM Thread Post by: DV on Monday, August 26, 2024, 18:35:35 Agreed. I liked Khan, and wondered if he would have worked better with this better defence we've got now. I would like to know the full story and reason behind his absence, I've probably missed the relevant information. IF we played Ofoborh holding I think Khan would a lot in perfectly as a #8 along side Clarke. Would play to his energetic & headless chickeness strengths imo alas it’s not happening. |