Title: The Budget Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 12:51:29 The bastards are putting up VAT to 20% after christmas!!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10371590.stm Title: Re: The Budget Post by: tans on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 12:55:14 yey fags havent gone up
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 12:56:40 Pay freeze for me for 2 years. This just gets better and better...
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:14:49 Pay freeze for me for 2 years. This just gets better and better... This stuff is just fiddling about the edges....the bugger will come in dept spending cuts which lead inevitably to job loses in the public sector.... Title: Re: The Budget Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:15:13 No duty increase on booze, fags and fuel!! :D
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:25:32 Pandering to the key marginal flammableBen constituency I see
Quote Labour's plan to increase the duty on cider by 10% above inflation will be scrapped from July. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: ghanimah on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:26:35 The bastards are putting up VAT to 20% after christmas!! http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10371590.stm The bastards (Labour) left the biggest peace time deficit in history. What the fuck do you expect them to do? Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Colin Todd on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:29:33 The government has very little choice but to raise taxes and cut spending. Everyone knows that. Labour would have done it as well, abeit in a less severe fashion.
Not a great deal to be surprised or outraged about, there are quite a few measures that actually improve things for people on low incomes, although where the budget actually leaves them overall after the VAT rise remains to be seen . Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:31:25 that vat rise will cost me about 10 grand a year.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: herthab on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:31:30 VAT increases are the best way to increase taxation.
I don't buy anything much anyway. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: bigbobjoylove on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:32:10 http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/politics/politics-headlines/osborne-to-sack-coventry-201006222840/
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:32:35 Quote The capital gains tax "entrepreneurs relief" rate of 10% on the first £2m of gains will be extended to the first £5m. It seems to me the rich getting richer, and the poorer struggling to survive. Public sector workers are lower paid than there counterparts in the private sector, so that's why I think it's unfair. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:33:47 It seems to me the rich getting richer, and the poorer struggling to survive. Welcome to a conservative government. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: ghanimah on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:38:45 Welcome to a conservative government. Because it was so great under Labour http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7003694.ece 2 words: LORD Mandelson Title: Re: The Budget Post by: thedarkprince on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:41:58 What the fuck are people complaining about? We're in the shitter and need to do this sooner rather than later. It's not like the Con-Dems haven't been telling us since they formed the goverment that this was coming.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:42:46 i regret voting lib dem big time.that cunt clegg nodding along to everything made me want to punch him fucking hard.
hypocritcal lying bastard! Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Colin Todd on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:47:41 It seems to me the rich getting richer, and the poorer struggling to survive. Public sector workers are lower paid than there counterparts in the private sector, so that's why I think it's unfair. Public sector workers get brilliant pensions compared to 90% of private sector workers. The pay freeze only applies to those earning under £21k so its not targeting the lowest paid public sector workers is it? Anyway its basically tough shit. Labour hired an additional 1m public sector workers. Quite a few of that number are doing worthless jobs, the country now cannot afford for them to be employed by the state just to keep them out of the dole queue. Its harsh on those individuals concerned, who may well have been good at their jobs but the bigger picture is that the country as a whole cant afford it any more. I've not had a pay rise for 2 years, probably wont get one this year and have a shit pension :shrug: Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Colin Todd on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:49:52 i regret voting lib dem big time.that cunt clegg nodding along to everything made me want to punch him fucking hard. hypocritcal lying bastard! How where they lying? the lib dems always said they were going to cut. They've got their way on some things like the £1000 rise the the tax threshold Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Mudfish on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:53:22 I assume my NHS wage of £20,600 odd wont be affected :beers:
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: ghanimah on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:54:09 How where they lying? the lib dems always said they were going to cut. They've got their way on some things like the £1000 rise the the tax threshold "Britain needs 'savage' cuts, says Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg" http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/sep/18/nick-clegg-liberal-democrats-spending Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:54:35 Public sector workers get brilliant pensions compared to 90% of private sector workers. The pay freeze only applies to those earning under £21k so its not targeting the lowest paid public sector workers is it? Anyway its basically tough shit. Labour hired an additional 1m public sector workers. Quite a few of that number are doing worthless jobs, the country now cannot afford for them to be employed by the state just to keep them out of the dole queue. Its harsh on those individuals concerned, who may well have been good at their jobs but the bigger picture is that the country as a whole cant afford it any more. I've not had a pay rise for 2 years, probably wont get one this year and have a shit pension :shrug: My job in the private sector is about 10 - 15k more than I'm on now. That's how it's unfair. Yet my poxy 3% pay rise/living allowance gets frozen. Cheers. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: STFC_Gazza on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:56:53 Because it was so great under Labour http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7003694.ece 2 words: LORD Mandelson Ah true however I was just stating the Conservatives are known for feeding the rich starving the poor so it's hardly a revelation they are doing the same now? Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 13:56:55 My job in the private sector is about 10 - 15k more than I'm on now. That's how it's unfair. Yet my poxy 3% pay rise/living allowance gets frozen. Cheers. Leave then. Get a new job. But then you'll be giving up the gold plated pension and long holidays you get, won't you. Poxy 3%? Most private sector workers have been lucky to get any rise for the past two years. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Sippo on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 14:03:59 There's not a lot out there is there? Yes I get the holidays, but I'd prefer to be paid to work during them!
Not a lot I can do about it now...anyone want the shirt off my back??! Oh and the pension really isn't as good as people make out. Obviously the more you pay in the more beneficial it is. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Barry Scott on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 14:06:38 Excellent. Another reasoned debate on how the rich are evil and the poor are honest. And how Labour are for the people and the conservatives are the devils incarnate.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Batch on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 14:14:21 private sector jobs used to offer some security at the expense of pay but with other perks.
its a shame for those people that its over, but the country is up shit creek. now public sector workers have to share the same readjustments is private sector workers have gone through and continue to go through. I'm just happy to have a job right now. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Colin Todd on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 14:19:50 Ah true however I was just stating the Conservatives are known for feeding the rich starving the poor so it's hardly a revelation they are doing the same now? Have you read the budget or just fancied a bit of sterotyping? Trying to be as objective as possible it seems pretty balanced to me - Theres tax increases for the middle classes in cap gains tax, a levy on the banks, whilst the poor get an extra grand taken out of the tax system but may have some housing benefit taken off them not a case of "feeding the rich starving the poor" at all. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Crispy on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 14:31:31 Aslong as fags/booze isnt affected i dont care :)
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Reg Smeeton on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:11:01 Aslong as fags/booze isnt affected i dont care :) You do realise that the young will be disproportionately hit by the forthcoming cuts don't you? Title: Re: The Budget Post by: tans on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:11:42 Aslong as fags/booze isnt affected i dont care :) youre not old enough to smoke are you? i thought you were 12 Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Power to people on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:26:50 They want the country to keep spending to keep people in jobs etc etc keep econemy tickling along but then go and whack 2.5 on VAT i.e the things people buy so people will look more serios on what they buy so the econemy will slow down - anyone for a double dip recesion ?
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: nevillew on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:29:08 Aslong as fags/booze isnt affected i dont care :) I think you'll find that the VAT increase will take care of that. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:31:23 2.5% on VAT certainly won't make me consider spending any differently. It's not as if I'm going out spending £000s on luxury goods each month. An extra 2.5p in the pound is next to fuck all for most people. That's only an extra couple of quid (if that) on the monthly shop.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: nevillew on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:35:21 that vat rise will cost me about 10 grand a year. Only if you don't put your prices up. The age old economic price/demand dilemma looms. Surely you'll get relief on the entrepreneur CGT allowance ? ;) Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Summerof69 on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:38:13 I've not had a pay rise for 2 years, probably wont get one this year and have a shit pension :shrug: And I'm also being made redundant in the next couple of months, and on statutory minimum redundancy. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Colin Todd on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:39:42 2.5% on VAT certainly won't make me consider spending any differently. It's not as if I'm going out spending £000s on luxury goods each month. An extra 2.5p in the pound is next to fuck all for most people. That's only an extra couple of quid (if that) on the monthly shop. Exactly. Much like no-one went out and spunked loads of money beacuse of the previous 2.5% drop in VAT. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: nevillew on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:42:44 The VAT rise will hit the club's revenue unless they (like Mexico Red) try to put up their prices.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:46:12 How where they lying? the lib dems always said they were going to cut. They've got their way on some things like the £1000 rise the the tax threshold because of everythind he said during the election in critism.only to sit there today like a fucking churchill nodding dog in agreement. he wanted power,now he has it. he is a cunt and those saying i dont get this,public sector get that.so what? do 2 wrongs make a right? should others have their rights and entitlements taken from them, because some in the private sector didn't have it in the first place? Title: Re: The Budget Post by: magicroundabout on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:48:55 why would a 2.5% affect people spending in the club shop?
So a £49.99 top will now cost £51. harldy any difference really. Club still make the same money. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:50:16 why would a 2.5% affect people spending in the club shop? So a £49.99 top will now cost £51. harldy any difference really. Club still make the same money. Only if the club increase the prices by 2.5%. If they don't, they'll have an increase of 2.5% on the VAT bill with no extra revenue to cover it. Or they could just revert back to the days of my namesake and forget about the VAT all together :D Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Colin Todd on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:50:59 because of everythind he said during the election in critism.only to sit there today like a fucking churchill nodding dog in agreement. he wanted power,now he has it. he is a cunt and those saying i dont get this,public sector get that.so what? do 2 wrongs make a right? should others have their rights and entitlements taken from them, because some in the private sector didn't have it in the first place? They're the minority in a coalition government, they're obviuisly not going to get their way all the time are they? They are achiving more of their goals (ie raising the tax threshold to £10k) by bumming the tories than they would have stood on the outside. I dont really understand your 2nd point. Do you think the governemnt should just carry on spending money it dosent have and hope for the best? Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Arriba on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:56:25 of course not.
i know cuts are inevtiable. it's others fuck em attitude my point was aimed at. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 15:58:23 Anything necessarily bad for students?
Like others have said, cuts were an inevitable necessity. It could have been worse too Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 16:01:42 Anything necessarily bad for students? I think having the Universities Minister describe you as "a burden on the taxpayer" isn't the best sign of positive things to comeTitle: Re: The Budget Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 16:06:08 That's always been the way though hasn't it? Be fucked without students (or decent/clever/innovative ones at least) in the long run.
No-one likes us, we don't care. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 16:26:35 I'm sure he said they were scrapping free swimming but can't see anything about it now?? Hope so! No pool full of unwashed youths who's parents send them up for the whole day so they don't have to bother with them!!
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 16:34:56 That's always been the way though hasn't it? Be fucked without students (or decent/clever/innovative ones at least) in the long run. Be that as it may, the universities minister apparently doesn't think so. And I guess this doesn't look too good for you soap-dodgers either:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/10378384.stm Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 16:42:15 Hmm. From a purely selfish point of view it's not that bad for me. Doesn't read to well though, was education not supposed to be left untouched?
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 17:15:58 Hmm. From a purely selfish point of view it's not that bad for me. Until your course gets cancelled/the dept gets shut down before you get your degree. Quote Doesn't read to well though, was education not supposed to be left untouched? IIRC the ringfenced things were to be left "untouched" only in terms of "frontline services". Of course, there's considerable scope for wiggle room in what constitutes "ringfenced", "untouched" and "frontline". But let's be honest, here, we're in poo creek and nothing will be sacred no matter what the pledges and that would always have been the case no matter which party won. They cancelled a new hospital the other night - I think that sends a much clearer message than any pledges about "ringfencing" and "frontline services untouched" etc. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: LucienSanchez on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 17:32:58 They won't cancel courses people are already on, they'll just have far fewer places available next year and forever more...
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 17:35:17 Yeah that's what I'd have thought. My course is quite highly ranked in the country so *hopefully* shouldn't be too badly affected.
Have to say it doesn't look good for my sister looking to go to uni next year Title: Re: The Budget Post by: ghanimah on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 17:39:57 Personally I don't understand why everyone is moaning about the budget, the most important issue is noisy crisp eaters:
Quote I take the train to work, which would be fine but for the fact that in a train, unlike in a car, you don't get to choose who sits next to you. This is a problem if, as I am, you're a magnet for people who eat noisily in public. During just about every train journey I take, there will be someone within 10 feet eating so noisily that I find it impossible to read, write or indeed do anything other than calculate how quickly I could flee to Brazil after throttling the warthog in question with his or her own shoelaces. I don't know whether this is your experience. Perhaps it's just me. Perhaps I unwittingly give off some signal that makes fellow passengers think: "I say, that poor devil looks as though he could do with hearing some squelchy, burp-punctuated mastication this morning. I must endeavour to be of service." The trouble with the noisiest eaters, aside from their screaming gracelessness, is that they are invariably also the slowest. The other day on the train, a man across the aisle was noisily eating crisps. "Eating" is possibly the wrong word, because almost as much was leaving his mouth as entering it. But what made it worse was that he was doing it one crisp at a time, at a rate of not less than 20 seconds per crisp, thus prolonging the torture to a degree surely inadmissible under the Geneva Convention. The moral of the Telegraph is; don't forget there's always someone worse off than you. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/7844120/Public-transport-is-marred-by-noisy-crisp-eaters.html Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 18:22:34 Did the drop in VAT rate last year rejuvinate the economy? A rise won't change much.
Clearly a very shitty budget for most people, but hopefully it will rejuvinate the private sector and kickstart the economy as intended. The danger will be if this short term emergency budget is continued for many years. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Lumps on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 18:47:52 2.5% on VAT certainly won't make me consider spending any differently. It's not as if I'm going out spending £000s on luxury goods each month. An extra 2.5p in the pound is next to fuck all for most people. That's only an extra couple of quid (if that) on the monthly shop. Er....... if you only spend £100 pounds a month you're right. Not living in rural Albania my outgoings are a tiny bit higher than that. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 18:59:36 If you can spend, say, 1000 quid on vatable items then the 25 quid extra shouldnt be a problem.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Batch on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 19:13:32 I think having the Universities Minister describe you as "a burden on the taxpayer" isn't the best sign of positive things to come That is definitely Labour's for screwing up Higher Education by turning everything in sight into a University so that the masses could exercise their right to read for a degree in something useless like media studies or flower arranging. After all the country will need a skilled workforce. Then they realised it costs too much so now everyone will be shafted on fees. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: @MacPhlea on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 19:27:25 Did the drop in VAT rate last year rejuvinate the economy? A rise won't change much. Clearly a very shitty budget for most people, but hopefully it will rejuvinate the private sector and kickstart the economy as intended. The danger will be if this short term emergency budget is continued for many years. May encourage a few people to buy stuff before the rise - it doesn't seem a lot but for anyone extending a house, employing tradesman or buying a car it can add up to a considerable 'saving' I'm surprised he didn't re-intrduce betting tax - the labour government did a great job of replacing tobacco addiction with a gambling addiction - pretty sure they could make a nice bit by re-imposing the 10% levy... I think they should also introduce a higher rate of tax for all off-licence sales allowing the pubs to survive a little longer Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 19:31:10 This rise in VAT is a fucking killer for me, im in a business where i get hit by the rise but cant pass it on to my customers, as i said will cost me personally about 10 grand.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: @MacPhlea on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 19:40:37 This rise in VAT is a fucking killer for me, im in a business where i get hit by the rise but cant pass it on to my customers, as i said will cost me personally about 10 grand. Look on the bright side, that 10 grand means that stinky kids can still go swimming in JFW's pool this year for free Title: Re: The Budget Post by: ghanimah on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 19:40:58 I think they should also introduce a higher rate of tax for all off-licence sales allowing the pubs to survive a little longer One small problem that would be illegal under EU law. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: @MacPhlea on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 19:42:11 One small problem that would be illegal under EU law. Why? They charge more for eating in than taking out - surely it's the same in reverse? Title: Re: The Budget Post by: ghanimah on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 19:49:03 Why? They charge more for eating in than taking out - surely it's the same in reverse? Taxing alcohol (and minimum pricing) come under EU competition laws. Take aways, i.e. food is different it comes under complicated VAT rules (VAT being an EU tax as condition of our membership in 1973) depending on whether it's hot or cold. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Lumps on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 19:53:09 If you can spend, say, 1000 quid on vatable items then the 25 quid extra shouldnt be a problem. I'm not saying it is, I'm just saying that for someone to say "it'll cost no more than a couple of quid a month" assumes a spend of only £100 per month. Anyone with a Starbucks habit that nips there every working day will pretty much spend that on coffee. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Talk Talk on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 19:54:44 I'm not saying it is, I'm just saying that for someone to say "it'll cost no more than a couple of quid a month" assumes a spend of only £100 per month. Anyone with a Starbucks habit that nips there every working day will pretty much spend that on coffee. Is it possible to have a Starbucks habit? Title: Re: The Budget Post by: @MacPhlea on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 19:56:03 Taxing alcohol (and minimum pricing) come under EU competition laws. Take aways, i.e. food is different it comes under complicated VAT rules (VAT being an EU tax as condition of our membership in 1973) depending on whether it's hot or cold. Minimum pricing is covered by EU law - taxing isn't - otherwise the government would not be allowed to change the tax on drinks... surely? Scotland tried to introduce minimum pricing on alcohol and got rapped for it but had they raised the tax then it would have been different Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 19:59:09 I'm not saying it is, I'm just saying that for someone to say "it'll cost no more than a couple of quid a month" assumes a spend of only £100 per month. Anyone with a Starbucks habit that nips there every working day will pretty much spend that on coffee. Anyone who spends £100 a month on coffee has a serious problem. And I was refering to a monthly shop i.e. grocery items. I was generalising when I said £100, but that's not far wide of the mark. I personally spend no more than £150 on groceries. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Talk Talk on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 19:59:42 Minimum pricing is covered by EU law - taxing isn't - otherwise the government would not be allowed to change the tax on drinks... surely? Minimum VAT is EU law, currently set at 15% for all member states. The hike to 20% will go some way to paying off the increase in EU contributions of £20bn this year. This is the real reason of course - VAT is and always will be there to pay for the cunts in Brussels. Also, 20% lines us up nicely with the standard rate in Europe. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: ghanimah on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 20:01:06 Minimum pricing is covered by EU law - taxing isn't - otherwise the government would not be allowed to change the tax on drinks... surely? Yes the Government can set whatever rate tax it likes, what it can't do is set different rates for the same products, i.e. one rate for pubs and another rate for the same beer in an offy or a supermarket. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 20:29:34 They won't cancel courses people are already on, they'll just have far fewer places available next year and forever more... Really? Tell that to my step-son - 2 years into a 3 year degree course, cancelled at the end of the 2nd year. No notice, nothing, just thanks for your fees for the past two years now fuck off. Wasn't even an undersubscribed course, in fact it was quite popular, just the Uni had decided they didn't want to run it any more. And that was before any cutbacks. There'll be plenty of Vice-Chancellors sharpening the knives for courses they've been wanting rid of for a while anyway and using cutbacks as an excuse. That is definitely Labour's for screwing up Higher Education by turning everything in sight into a University so that the masses could exercise their right to read for a degree in something useless like media studies or flower arranging. After all the country will need a skilled workforce. Oh I don't disagree - the "all must have prizes" attitude has done a lot of damage. Just giving an example of why dave's "I'm all right Jack" complacency is almost certainly misplaced. No sector will escape the effects of the tightenings over the next few years, we're all going to be hit by it. Anyone who thinks they're going to escape is either a fool or a Cabinet Minister. Possibly bothThen they realised it costs too much so now everyone will be shafted on fees. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: LucienSanchez on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 20:40:38 Oh. I start a 3 year BA in History this September and thought I was safe!
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 20:46:37 Oh. I start a 3 year BA in History this September and thought I was safe! I don't think it will be a widespread practice to be honest. In this case, it was a new course and while it wasn't one of your "Applied Flower Arranging and Travel Solutions" it also wasn't mainstream academic and while it was popular with students the Uni seems to have decided it "didn't fit" with their "strategy", so they just canned it. I'd have thought a solid mainstream academic course like History at a well-established Uni would be reasonably safe. But without wishing to be alarmist, we could be in for a national shortage of Media Studies graduates in a few years' time. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Lumps on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 20:48:55 Anyone who spends £100 a month on coffee has a serious problem. And I was refering to a monthly shop i.e. grocery items. I was generalising when I said £100, but that's not far wide of the mark. I personally spend no more than £150 on groceries. What is the cost of a medium latte or whatever in one of these places £2-3? Pick one of those up in your lunch break each day and you're looking at £60 or so. And fucking well done if you only spend £100 - £150 on groceries a month, I can spend that each week, but most groceries are going to be zero rated surely? Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Batch on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 20:49:38 Oh. I start a 3 year BA in History this September and thought I was safe! Its a thing of the past. Well someone had to say it. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 20:52:26 Its a thing of the past. You're no nev ... but it made me smileWell someone had to say it. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Batch on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 20:53:07 Really? Tell that to my step-son - 2 years into a 3 year degree course, cancelled at the end of the 2nd year. No notice, nothing, just thanks for your fees for the past two years now fuck off. Whilst my post was part tongue in cheek and part serious but for anyone to be in this situation really really sucks. Is there no right of appeal or any way to reclaim the fees? Not a lot can be done about the two years 'wasted', unless there is a possibility of transferring. I bet even then there would be 2 more years to do. *cough* class action lawsuit *cough* You're no nev ... but it made me smile I'm not even Adver standard. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Samdy Gray on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 20:53:33 And fucking well done if you only spend £100 - £150 on groceries a month, I can spend that each week, but most groceries are going to be zero rated surely? I don't know if you're being sarchastic there (I sense you are), I'm sorry I don't earn as much as you your Lumpiness to spend as much as you on my shopping. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: oxford_fan on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 20:56:34 Surely he can take his credits to another course? Might even be able to join and go into his 3rd year as before.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 20:57:30 Is there no right of appeal or any way to reclaim the fees? Not a lot can be done about the two years 'wasted', unless there is a possibility of transferring. I bet even then there would be 2 more years to do. He apparently can transfer the two years as "credit" or something and finish off the final year somewhere else. If he can find somewhere running the course. By himself, cos the Uni (and the SU) couldn't get shut of him fast enough. And if we can persuade him that it's actually worth doing as, unsurprisingly, having worked his knackers off for two years with side jobs etc while doing the course and still run up a load of debt, he's a little disillusioned with the whole idea now. And I can't say I blame him. It's not like we can even say to him "Well, if you have a degree, you'll stand a better chance of getting a better job". Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Rich Pullen on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:00:44 Many Universities have been cutting courses significantly for the last few years.
Don't underestimate the Media crowd though, it makes academic establishments millions. You'll see a lot of specific courses merge to become a much general one. For example, I did a course which to many is considered a "Mickey Mouse" and the modules were merged into History shortly after I left. What happened to PaulD's step-son occurred in Exeter in about 2005 (chemistry), the students had to look for another Uni to finish it off. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Batch on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:04:30 :( Name and shame the Uni Paul.
Disappointed to hear the SU being dismissive. I assume this includes the NUS itself? I'm sure you've been down this route though. I have no idea how I will support my 2 if they get to uni. Sell a kidney is the best option but its not likely to be worth much by that time. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:05:50 i will buy your kidney now.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Batch on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:08:20 Sorry Mex, I didn't think before posting.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:27:35 :( Name and shame the Uni Paul. Bath Spa. Shouldn't have been surprised as they seemed throughout his time there to have been more of fee-grabbing machine than have any genuine interest in the pastoral care/academic career of their students. But then I do have quite a biased and embittered source on this so maybe others have had a better experience with them.Even so, I was pretty shocked, I didn't even know they could do that. I was torn between suing them for breach of contract or just going down the Vice Chancellor's (or whatever they have) office and sorting it out with a bat. Consequently, the missus dealt with most of it, I was firmly kept at arm's length. Quote Disappointed to hear the SU being dismissive. They weren't dismissive as such, just not much help. Although I don't know how much they could have done anyway - as I say, I was kept away from dealing with it as the whole subject made me incandescent and so I had a somewhat "unconstructive" attitude.I'm sure it won't happen to dave and Lucien - hope not anyway, and best of luck in getting through your courses, chaps, and hopefully coming out with something worthwhile to show for it at the end (a job as well as a qualification) Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Bogus Dave on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:30:26 That sounds well shit Paul. What happened in the end?
It must be said the reality seems a bit scary, so i'll continue in blissfull ignorance :) Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Talk Talk on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:30:50 I'm not even Adver standard. The Adver have a standard? :eek: Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Colin Todd on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:31:22 I'd cut available uni places in half. 50% of the youth going to uni is pointless, many will end up in shit / semi shit jobs they could have done without a soft degree and £20k of debt. How was people in their early 20's being in that much debt with employment prospects no better than someone with half decent a levels and a bit of employment experience ever a good idea?
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Simon Pieman on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:33:59 Won't the average person's increase in 'VAT spend' be covered by the increase in personal allowance? Admittedly, I haven't had a chance to go through most of the budget and only seen/heard the headline stuff.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Colin Todd on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:39:47 Give or take a bit depending on how much you spend, yes
£180 p/a is the figure i've seen mentioned for personal allowance Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:42:47 That sounds well shit Paul. What happened in the end? Nominally, he took a year out to work off some of the debt while he looked for somewhere else running a similar course so he could do his final year. But in reality, I doubt he'll now go back - he's done quite well in his "stop-gap" job, worked hard to pay the worst of the debt down and doesn't want to get back into that situation again. Now his girlfriend's finished her final year and they're talking about going working/travelling for a year. And good luck to them. Very much doubt he'll want to pick up the final year when he gets back. And I can't say I blame him. Thanks a fucking lot Bath Spa. Fortunately, he's a good lad, he's bright and works hard at whatever he applies himself to so I'm sure he'll find his own path despite their "help" in setting him back at the start of his career.Quote It must be said the reality seems a bit scary, so i'll continue in blissfull ignorance :) Meh, tbh, despite my obvious scare tactic I don't think it will be the reality for very many, I was (initially) just using what I'm sure is a pretty extreme case as a way of saying the cutbacks etc will affect everyone in some way even if it's not immediately obvious from the Budget today - this is just the start of it. But, like I say, I'm sure you'll be fine dave. Best of luck! Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:46:20 Give or take a bit depending on how much you spend, yes Going purely on the basis of a snippet I heard on the radio on the way home (so almost certainly wrong!), they reckoned households earning around £20k (I think) would be about 200 quid a year worse off overall, over £50k and it goes up to about £1500. And IIRC up to around £30k, they seemed to think 3-400 quid a year. God knows how that breaks down though.£180 p/a is the figure i've seen mentioned for personal allowance Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Lumps on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 21:47:25 I don't know if you're being sarchastic there (I sense you are), I'm sorry I don't earn as much as you your Lumpiness to spend as much as you on my shopping. No I'm genuinely fucking impressed. You clearly shop in a disciplined and sensible fashion, rather than my ....oooh look venision steaks! approach......which is probably not the best way to cost effective trolley filling Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Colin Todd on Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 23:48:49 Venison! you champagne communist
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: nevillew on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 07:35:57 why would a 2.5% affect people spending in the club shop? So a £49.99 top will now cost £51. harldy any difference really. Club still make the same money. If that's in response to my post regarding club finances:- You don't think I might have been referring to ticket sales then ? Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Saxondale on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 07:38:56 Ticket sales are what concerns me in my job. Gig tickets are expensive already, add the VAT increase its all going to get a little difficult.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Mexicano Rojo on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 07:41:01 exactly mr nash, its a fiver to get in my club, before any tax or running costs a fucking pound of that fiver is now going out to vat
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Luci on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 08:06:10 Excuse me for ignorance here but can someone remind me why Uni is free north of the border and prescriptions free in Wales when we have to pay for both? I have genuinely never really understood this.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Bogus Dave on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 08:09:24 I think it's because (in simple terms which I can understand) the scots and welsh get £XXXXXX from the government. The welsh spend some of theres on making prescriptions free, the scots spend thers on free universitys.
I think. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Talk Talk on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 08:09:52 Excuse me for ignorance here but can someone remind me why Uni is free north of the border and prescriptions free in Wales when we have to pay for both? I have genuinely never really understood this. The Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly have their own portion of 'national' budgets to spend on what they want. The Scots subsidise higher education and the Welsh health care. In England we do this: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20100619/tuk-government-spends-18-000-on-wine-6323e80.html (http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20100619/tuk-government-spends-18-000-on-wine-6323e80.html) Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Luci on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 08:11:50 Ah, I see. I wasn't sure if it was a case of "how they use the money they're given" but clearly it is.
Damn, I can't even rant about they should be made to pay as its clearly the fact they utilise their resources better. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 08:39:26 No I'm genuinely fucking impressed. I'm not sure what I'm more amazed by - that Samdy can do his monthly shopping for 150 quid, or that you shop somewhere where venison steaks are an impulse buy. Where the hell do the two of you shop because I'm pretty sure neither applies in Tesco?You clearly shop in a disciplined and sensible fashion, rather than my ....oooh look venision steaks! approach......which is probably not the best way to cost effective trolley filling Title: Re: The Budget Post by: nevillew on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 08:41:19 This rise in VAT is a fucking killer for me, im in a business where i get hit by the rise but cant pass it on to my customers, as i said will cost me personally about 10 grand. You could always spend the money you gained when they dropped it to 15% though ? Title: Re: The Budget Post by: nevillew on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 08:42:16 No I'm genuinely fucking impressed. You clearly shop in a disciplined and sensible fashion, rather than my ....oooh look venision steaks! approach......which is probably not the best way to cost effective trolley filling I'd never buy those - venison is too deer. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 08:43:07 I'd never buy those - venison is too deer. Let's not have a roe about itTitle: Re: The Budget Post by: Talk Talk on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 08:49:42 I had one of those on a stag night.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: nevillew on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 08:56:00 Easy to say with hind sight
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: pauld on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 08:57:47 I'd really hoped this thread wouldn't descend into a punfest, but then I guess you can't buck the trend
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Talk Talk on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:22:37 I'd really hoped this thread wouldn't descend into a punfest, but then I guess you can't buck the trend I think your comment has fallen on fallow ground. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Phil_S on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:24:51 Dear Dear Deer
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Talk Talk on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:27:02 Fifty bonus points for working 'Muntjac' in.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:30:07 I'm not sure what I'm more amazed by - that Samdy can do his monthly shopping for 150 quid, or that you shop somewhere where venison steaks are an impulse buy. Where the hell do the two of you shop because I'm pretty sure neither applies in Tesco? Well there's only two mouths to feed. Little one is still on the homemade stuff, so to speak, at the moment. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: nevillew on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:31:22 Fifty bonus points for working 'Muntjac' in. kudus to anyone who manages that. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Doore on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:34:16 Well there's only two mouths to feed. Little one is still on the homemade stuff, so to speak, at the moment. Samdy, does that cover everthing - i.e. non foods (bathroom stuff, cleaning stuff etc) as well as lunches every day etc? I'm not being sarcastic either - I think I need some tips from you. Me and my good lady spend at least sixty quid a week in the supermarket. Mind you, with her cravings at the moment, we are spending a few quid a week on apples alone... Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Talk Talk on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:36:44 kudus to anyone who manages that. Pah, that's an antelope. Wildebeest in you think of other non-compliant animals, like gazelles? Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Samdy Gray on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:41:28 Samdy, does that cover everthing - i.e. non foods (bathroom stuff, cleaning stuff etc) as well as lunches every day etc? I'm not being sarcastic either - I think I need some tips from you. Me and my good lady spend at least sixty quid a week in the supermarket. Mind you, with her cravings at the moment, we are spending a few quid a week on apples alone... Yep, pretty much covers everything. We generally shop once a fortnight and spend around £75. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Phil_S on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:46:58 Thought food was zero rated though.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Talk Talk on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:47:50 Yep, pretty much covers everything. We generally shop once a fortnight and spend around £75. We spend £600 a month, but that's for a family of six. So £100 a head a month, not much above your £75 a head I guess. Billy's is about £120. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:51:01 fucking hell talk talk you shopping in M&S or something?
there is 5 of us here and a month we probably spend £200 - £300 tops. this includes beer etc. £600. fuck that Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Talk Talk on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:53:34 fucking hell talk talk you shopping in M&S or something? there is 5 of us here and a month we probably spend £200 - £300 tops. this includes beer etc. £600. fuck that No, Sainsbury's. Four teenage (or thereabouts) children = eaten out of house and home. Although having said that, we don't buy much crap and spend a lot on fresh meat for daily meals which bumps it up a lot. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:57:49 thats the big cost then. fresh meet. oh and the teenagers.
god help when ours grow up. the Mrs will have to go full time to afford it Title: Re: The Budget Post by: tans on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 09:58:28 prob spend about 400.
for 2. Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Talk Talk on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:00:14 Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Arriba on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:00:39 i reckon i spend around £500 a month in supermarkets.family of 4
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: tans on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:07:10 :eek: that includes everything though eg bathroom stuff, beer, etc etc Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Talk Talk on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:10:32 that includes everything though eg bathroom stuff, beer, etc etc ..and at that cost presumably ladies of the night and several bottles of 20 year old whisky? Title: Re: The Budget Post by: tans on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:15:24 ..and at that cost presumably ladies of the night and several bottles of 20 year old whisky? fillet steak, lobster and venison ;) to be fair, we need to cut down Title: Re: The Budget Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:16:36 you're telling me you fat cunt
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:18:14 I'm probably not far off that Tans I start off the month with good I intentions but all the little top up shops inbetween bump it up!
My boyfriend and cat eat ALOT though!! Title: Re: The Budget Post by: tans on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:18:35 boing boing
didnt stop you eating it all when you stayed you fat ginger greedy bastard! Title: Re: The Budget Post by: tans on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:19:52 thats to magic, not you jfw
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Jamiesfuturewife on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:21:39 :D
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: tans on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:23:01 MR after he stayed at mine
[url width=604 height=453]http://i49.tinypic.com/6dwnbp.jpg[/url] Title: Re: The Budget Post by: magicroundabout on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 10:35:25 ha ha ha ha
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: adje on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 13:02:42 Dear Dear Deer I dont have the hart to join in this punfest Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Doore on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 13:07:10 I don't have the time to ruminant over a decent deer-related pun.
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Lumps on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 19:45:11 Is there a mod that can just slap a 6 week ban on anyone that turns a thread into a pu ridden disaster zone?
Title: Re: The Budget Post by: Reg Smeeton on Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 19:51:32 Is there a mod that can just slap a 6 week ban on anyone that turns a thread into a pu ridden disaster zone? Are you getting sika it Lumps ? |