|
McLovin
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Monday, January 2, 2006, 19:03:42 » |
|
They still come from his shots, Johno...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
red macca
|
|
« Reply #16 on: Monday, January 2, 2006, 19:13:47 » |
|
gerrard. more versataile imo opinion when it comes to big games gerard stands out a mile
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
 Offline
Posts: 32491
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #17 on: Monday, January 2, 2006, 19:27:56 » |
|
Beckham....  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bennett
No Comment
 Online
Posts: 9532
|
|
« Reply #18 on: Monday, January 2, 2006, 19:59:53 » |
|
Beckham.... how did u add another poll option?! oh wait... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
|
|
|
oxford_fan
Offline
Posts: 6764
|
|
« Reply #19 on: Monday, January 2, 2006, 20:41:26 » |
|
Gerrard is best.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #20 on: Monday, January 2, 2006, 22:24:11 » |
|
They still come from his shots, Johno... didn't say there not his shots, but can't get them in without someone deflecting them away from the goal. i still think he's a good player of course! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36319
|
|
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 13:17:02 » |
|
Lampard is better at what he does, probably the best in the world at what he does - which is getting into good positions and either playing the ball on or belting it toward the goal. I think he frees up alot of space for the strikers as well.
On the other hand I think Gerrard is more gifted in terms of skill, passing ability and vision. I think he has more of a footballing brain than Lampard (who seems more instinctive). He's also good leader.
On balance I've gone for Gerrard.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 20:10:23 » |
|
Lampard will always score goals but his passing and creativity is sometimes his weak link. Gerrard is better because he scores goals and does both of those things well (when he isnt in an England shirt that is)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SwindonFan
|
|
« Reply #23 on: Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 20:17:09 » |
|
Michael Pook for me
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
|
« Reply #24 on: Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 20:32:08 » |
|
yeah hes just brilliant isnt he? :-))(  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #25 on: Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 20:36:29 » |
|
Lampard will always score goals but his passing and creativity is sometimes his weak link. Gerrard is better because he scores goals and does both of those things well (when he isnt in an England shirt that is) Sorry Rich but that is shit. After maybe Alonso Lampard is probably the best passer in the premiership, better than Gerrard. His long passes are incredibly accurate and he has more assists than Gerrard as well as more goals. His main strength though is he never gets tired, there are no players in the world who can match Lampard's workrate and that's why he's the better of the two. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #26 on: Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 20:41:21 » |
|
But Lampard has got Makele doing the majority of the dirty work for him which enables him to get into goalscoring/creating positions, whilst Gerrard has to carry the entire Liverpool side.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #27 on: Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 20:49:39 » |
|
Liverpool have some great players Carragher, Alonso, Garcia, Crouchy. Gerrard doesn't have to carry them on his own any more, they are a good side. It's true that Makalele helps but Makalele was out for several games and Lampard was still class but when Lampard couldn't play last week Chelsea looked a much poorer side.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #28 on: Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 20:54:28 » |
|
Liverpool have some great players Carragher, Alonso, Garcia, Crouchy. Gerrard doesn't have to carry them on his own any more, they are a good side. It's true that Makalele helps but Makalele was out for several games and Lampard was still class but when Lampard couldn't play last week Chelsea looked a much poorer side. They were made to look poor by a battling Man City side, Lampard wouldnt have made a bit of difference. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 21:06:34 » |
|
Can't agree with you there, there is a reason why he has the longest run in a premiership side, not only is he incredibly consistent but you can't afford to drop him ever, he starts every game because he is Chelsea's most important player. They aren't the same side without him. They can cope without Terry and Makalele though they are very important but not without Lampard.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
