|
|
|
DMR
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: Sunday, December 18, 2005, 20:44:25 » |
|
No thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Sunday, December 18, 2005, 21:04:02 » |
|
I hope it isnt Harford. :evil:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
 Offline
Posts: 33904
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Sunday, December 18, 2005, 21:23:39 » |
|
That 16 games without a win looks might impressive on his CV though :roll:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Spencer_White
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Sunday, December 18, 2005, 21:32:45 » |
|
:roll: Get your seasons right Nozza.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33904
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Sunday, December 18, 2005, 21:32:52 » |
|
Crosby went to Middlesbrough, look at all the young talent breaking into their first team now  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
STFC Village
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 00:49:34 » |
|
That story is from thisis for a start!
BOLLOCKS!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yeo
Offline
Posts: 3651
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 00:51:45 » |
|
Well actually it originates from the News of the World so it must be true  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
/
W56196272
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 00:59:53 » |
|
Wouldn't be that surprised to see him come in as a 'guiding hand' Steve Coppell styliee and keep his hand in the game but I thought he had gone to Oldham. Screws normally base these sort of things on half truths or rumours and printi it as fact. Must admit I've not seen owt about it before. Must be true |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 07:00:08 » |
|
I don't think King had much to do with why we did well tbh. even though i hate talking about king now, saying that is harsh. Just because its king, who nobody likes, you say he had nothing to do with it. Any other manager would get full praise. just stupid. Course he had something to do with it, got the team to start with. sorry for talking about king. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 08:10:53 » |
|
even worse manager than Iffy!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 08:22:53 » |
|
yeah, because iffy's a terrible manager :roll:
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 08:43:10 » |
|
yeah, because iffy's a terrible manager :roll: |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 57818
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 09:29:47 » |
|
I wonder if Harford could be used to our advantage though? Keep Iffy as manager and use him as whatever to tap up some teams for January loans?
No, that wouldn't work would it. It's all guff anyhow.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
fatbury
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Monday, December 19, 2005, 09:31:51 » |
|
why ? Harford is shite!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
