Poll
Question: Who gets your vote?  (Voting closes: Friday, September 5, 2025, 20:58:07)
Lewis Ward - 0 (0%)
Ryan Delaney (sub 45) - 0 (0%)
Filozofe Mabete (sub 45) - 0 (0%)
Will Wright (sub 74) - 4 (14.3%)
Billy Kirkman - 5 (17.9%)
Joel McGregor - 4 (14.3%)
Ollie Clarke (sub 80) - 0 (0%)
Danny Butterworth - 4 (14.3%)
Billy Bodin - 2 (7.1%)
Ollie Palmer (sub 63) - 6 (21.4%)
Princewill Ehibatiomhan - 3 (10.7%)
Gavin Kilkenny (on 46) - 0 (0%)
Finlay Munroe (on 46) - 0 (0%)
Jake Tabor (on 63) - 0 (0%)
Joe Snowdon (on 74) - 0 (0%)
Paul Glatzel (on 80) - 0 (0%)
None of the above - 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 28

Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Swindon v Reading MotM Thread  (Read 771 times)
Nemo
Shit Bacon

Offline Offline

Posts: 23812





Ignore
« on: Tuesday, September 2, 2025, 20:58:07 »

Fun, if a bit silly. Let's not play a no centre back side again please.
Logged
jayohaitchenn
Wielder of the BANHAMMER

Offline Offline

Posts: 12858




« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, September 2, 2025, 20:59:14 »

quite a few good performances there but no one really stood out to me. I'll go Joel McGregor who made a pretty good CB for a winger Cheesy
Logged
Crozzer

Offline Offline

Posts: 2802





Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, September 2, 2025, 21:07:09 »

Ollie Palmer for his goal and overall performance, didn't hold the ball up as well up front when he went off.
« Last Edit: Tuesday, September 2, 2025, 22:15:02 by Crozzer » Logged
Batch
Not a Batch

Offline Offline

Posts: 58242





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, September 2, 2025, 21:12:21 »

Wright for his free kick.

McGregor was ok, but his mistake cost us all our momentum. He'll learn I'm sure.

Thought it was all just 'ok'. They haven't played together and haven't played much so not unexpected.

I thought Bodin and Tabor were disappointing but again not many games minutes in those legs
Logged
Crozzer

Offline Offline

Posts: 2802





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, September 2, 2025, 21:22:20 »


I thought Bodin and Tabor were disappointing but again not many games minutes in those legs

Bodin was playing a weird attacking midfield role, thought he did o.k.  Tabor showed some nice touches, thought he did well, was involved in play quite frequently during his time on the field.  The attack didn't hold the ball upfront as capably after Palmer went off.  Would do better with Palmer along side him.
Logged
adje

Offline Offline

Posts: 14919





Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, September 2, 2025, 21:57:33 »

Butters for me. Showed what a player trying to break into a starting spot should be doing. Plenty of fight and a great deal of skill. Kirkman also but not quite as impressive as Butterworth. And Palmer,brilliant first half. MCGregor unfortunately cost us a goal and almost another but apart from that played well I thought
« Last Edit: Tuesday, September 2, 2025, 21:59:57 by adje » Logged

quot;Molten memories splashing down
 upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
Nomoreheroes
The Moral Majority

Offline Offline

Posts: 15998





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Today at 07:07:12 »

I thought Mabete was good again. The thing he always does is make space so that the keeper or other defenders can play out. He also makes and completes lots of single passes. When he went off, we resorted to Ward chipping into touch or onto their left winger's head!

McGregor did very well too. Full of dark arts at that age. Incredible talent.

But, I think that Butterworth had a pretty good game too. Proabably one of his best games for us. So will go for him (although I think it was more of a team performance rather than individual stand out one)
Logged

You're my incurable malady. I miss the pleasure of your company.
Pericardinho

Online Online

Posts: 1503




Ignore
« Reply #7 on: Today at 08:00:23 »

Fun, if a bit silly. Let's not play a no centre back side again please.

What do you mean? Kirkman, Clarke and McGregor back 3 again saturday let's go!
Logged
Terminator

Online Online

Posts: 36




Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Today at 09:12:30 »

Thought Kirkman was good and gave him the nod.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: