Pages: 1 ... 197 198 199 [200] 201 202 203 ... 235   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: The Squad List (2024/25 Edition)  (Read 475876 times)
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 12004




Ignore
« Reply #2985 on: Monday, April 8, 2024, 15:59:59 »

Of the players we have, only McCarthy wants to be a defender first, and he is going back.  We don't have a single defender who has a real desire to be a defender, they are all ball players or attacking from deep types.

Our entire midfield has no defensive ability.

Our attackers are a bit flashy at time, not ours, or out of legs.

Overall, I'd bomb the place and start again if I thought we would try and do it properly.  As it is, we can't or won't, so it will be a mess most likely.
Logged
Audrey

Offline Offline

Posts: 19781


?Absolute Calamity!?




Ignore
« Reply #2986 on: Monday, April 8, 2024, 16:04:23 »

If you take each player individually most of them are decent at this level and I can’t see this regime getting much better replacements. As we’ve been saying all season it’s the structure, tactics (or lack thereof), leadership and general tardiness of all  aspects of being a professional football club that’s been the problem.
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 12004




Ignore
« Reply #2987 on: Monday, April 8, 2024, 16:12:04 »

If you take each player individually most of them are decent at this level and I can’t see this regime getting much better replacements. As we’ve been saying all season it’s the structure, tactics (or lack thereof), leadership and general tardiness of all  aspects of being a professional football club that’s been the problem.

You see, I fundamentally disagree.

Glatzel has some potential, but not much more than Wakleing offered for me, not yet.

I haven't seen the new lad too much, there is a reason every other league club gave him a hard pass though, it's a risk to bank too heavily on him, and not fair on him.

The rest are a bunch of nothingness.  Managers alone are not the reason we have had such a shit season, two in a row.  Lets be honest, bar a late good run and the context of the pre season in 21/22, Garner would have been toast as well.  We've been not much better than OK at L2 since our rteurn, and we were shit in L1 as well.

While Managers have not helped, the reason for such extended malaise is because the squad is simply not good enough.  Fans tend to give the benefit of the doubt to players on their teams, nobody stays long enough at our club to get turned on these days.  Aguiar is the longest serving, and he's clearly not a L2 player.  Just because he can shoot, doesn't mean he is any good.  The game passes him by - give the rest two more seasons and people will say the same about the majority of them.  As an example, Cain is hanging by the fact he hasn't played often enough to cement the fact he really isn't good enough.
Logged
UTR

Online Online

Posts: 909




Ignore
« Reply #2988 on: Monday, April 8, 2024, 16:12:40 »

I don’t think this squad is anywhere near good enough to go up even with the best structure and I also don’t think we’ll get much better replacements if they depart.

Lovely.
Logged
Nemo
Shit Bacon

Offline Offline

Posts: 22431





Ignore
« Reply #2989 on: Monday, April 8, 2024, 16:15:30 »

Dion Conroy and Ronan Darcy are currently a major part of a team that are in the playoff hunt. We won the league with Ellis Iandolo at left back. You can get away with okay players in a good system in this league - it certainly helps to have better ones, but structure is so much more important than talent (mostly because talent gets sold at the earliest opportunity).
Logged
RobertT

Offline Offline

Posts: 12004




Ignore
« Reply #2990 on: Monday, April 8, 2024, 16:32:30 »

Oh, I agree - I have said it before, the talent level divide isn't big.  I am not calling our players out based on the skills, I am calling out the fact we committed the cardinal sin in L2 of putting together a squad with nobody willing to fight for a clean sheet.  Flitcrofts team wasn't good enough, but it wasn't far off.  They'd beat us.

Were Dunne and Linganzi any better than our current midfield, not on the ball, no.  Talent wise, in the sense we think about it, they were technically inferior players to what we have.  They did however fit the job they were asked to do.  One of them needed to sit, one needed to run around a lot.  Defend first, support the attack when needed.  The back four were terrible on the ball vs what we have now, but they were all defenders, even if only average.

The front four of that team was a bit cart horsey, but they also could battle, which was needed given our approach.

Overall they were a bit shit, not good enough for promotion.  That is still a better composed squad than what we have.  Anyone can find a twinkle toes rotting in an Academy, we haven't found L2 players to impose that sense of shape and discipline on.  Even if we did, we should still be expecting more than that as well - if we expect less, we'll get what we are getting now.
Logged
adje

Offline Offline

Posts: 14124





Ignore
« Reply #2991 on: Monday, April 8, 2024, 18:26:42 »

Dion Conroy and Ronan Darcy are currently a major part of a team that are in the playoff hunt. We won the league with Ellis Iandolo at left back. You can get away with okay players in a good system in this league - it certainly helps to have better ones, but structure is so much more important than talent (mostly because talent gets sold at the earliest opportunity).
QED
Logged

quot;Molten memories splashing down
 upon the rooves of Swindon Town"
Berniman
Sits in front of JFW

Offline Offline

Posts: 11020


Miserable cnut (AKA Happy Clapper)




Ignore
« Reply #2992 on: Tuesday, April 9, 2024, 08:56:57 »

I am going to be that really harsh fucker who people thinks is saying it for attention but we should be getting much better than Bycroft

Agreed - Bycroft should be pushing a No.1
Logged

“Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.” ― Marcus Aurelius

When somebody shouts STOP! I never know if it's in the name of love, if it's HAMMER TIME, or if I should collaborate and listen...
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33082


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #2993 on: Tuesday, April 9, 2024, 09:03:33 »

Bycroft for me - just looks like exactly what he is.
Young keeper making his first foray into proper men’s football. Same as Mahoney in that aspect.

Hopefully he can kick on a bit next season.

Not sure there is abundance of better keepers at this level.

I can’t think of any keeper I’ve seen this season and thought ‘yeah, he’s a bit good’ but that probably hasn’t been helped by some of our attacking play or lack thereof.
Logged
Riddick

Offline Offline

Posts: 2820




Ignore
« Reply #2994 on: Tuesday, April 9, 2024, 09:22:01 »

Compare to our most recent successful league 2 seasons. I would say Wollacot was a bit better than Bycroft and that Benda was a lot better.

Is Bycroft good enough for a promotion team? Maybe, if he kicks on. This is his first league football experience.

Note the previous two mentioned keepers had either Ward or McCormick pushing them, something i think is often overlooked. There is a school of thought that says run with 1 GK, and spend the money elsewhere and use the emergency loan when needed.
Logged
TheDukeOfBanbury

Offline Offline

Posts: 4103





Ignore
« Reply #2995 on: Tuesday, April 9, 2024, 09:25:49 »

Dion Conroy and Ronan Darcy are currently a major part of a team that are in the playoff hunt. We won the league with Ellis Iandolo at left back. You can get away with okay players in a good system in this league - it certainly helps to have better ones, but structure is so much more important than talent (mostly because talent gets sold at the earliest opportunity).

Constant budget cuts and watering down our talent has finally caught up with us.
A team full of young cheap kids alone won’t get you out of a brutal League Two campaign.
Logged
Peter Venkman
Is totally unexceptional

Offline Offline

Posts: 61248


Perfection is not attainable



« Reply #2996 on: Tuesday, April 9, 2024, 09:55:16 »

Bycroft for me - just looks like exactly what he is.
Young keeper making his first foray into proper men’s football. Same as Mahoney in that aspect.

Hopefully he can kick on a bit next season.

Not sure there is abundance of better keepers at this level.

I can’t think of any keeper I’ve seen this season and thought ‘yeah, he’s a bit good’ but that probably hasn’t been helped by some of our attacking play or lack thereof.
I agree totally on Bycroft, hes a young kid who I think could become a very good keeper, hes been rushed into our first team and done well for probably 90% of the time, I like him but he should probably be a number 2 at this stage to a more experienced keeper.

As for other keepers, the only keeper who really impressed against us this season was the Salford keeper Alex Cairns who looked extremely capable at all aspects and who possibly had the game of his life against us a few weeks back and he made at least 5 or 6 great stops in our draw with them, but hes 31 and very experienced.
Logged

Well, we know where we're goin'
But we don't know where we've been
And we know what we're knowin'
But we can't say what we've seen
And we're not little children
And we know what we want
And the future is certain
Give us time to work it out
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33082


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #2997 on: Tuesday, April 9, 2024, 10:17:16 »

I get the point about maybe he should be a #2 keeper right now but he won’t get any better sitting on the bench and (obviously) keeper is the least subbed position.

I guess it’s the age old debate whether it’s worth trying to upskill a young keeper or just keep signing aging veterans and bin one off for the next one every season or two.

If you’re #2 left back you’ll play throughout the season. You’ll get bought on as sub. You’ll swap a bit of the fixtures get congested. Rarely happens with keepers.
Logged
Nemo
Shit Bacon

Offline Offline

Posts: 22431





Ignore
« Reply #2998 on: Tuesday, April 9, 2024, 10:33:05 »

I guess it’s the age old debate whether it’s worth trying to upskill a young keeper or just keep signing aging veterans and bin one off for the next one every season or two.

Or the STFC method - upskill a young keeper and bin them off for the next one every season (or twice a season, if we're really lucky)
Logged
DV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 33082


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #2999 on: Tuesday, April 9, 2024, 10:35:13 »

Or the STFC method - upskill a young keeper and bin them off for the next one every season (or twice a season, if we're really lucky)

…upskill someone’s else’s young keeper*
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 197 198 199 [200] 201 202 203 ... 235   Go Up
Print
Jump to: