CARTMAN
 Offline
Posts: 286
|
 |
« on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 11:51:55 » |
|
3-jack smith
4-nicky nicolau
6-steve jenkins
7-gareth whalley
9-tony thorpe
11-jamie cureton
12-ricky shakes
17-charli comyn platt
the rest i think are the same as last year
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 11:57:14 » |
|
reeves is 14...roberts is 18...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Johno
Offline
Posts: 5927
|
|
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 11:57:54 » |
|
jenkins already was 6 wasn't he? ifil is now 5....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CARTMAN
Offline
Posts: 286
|
|
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 12:09:22 » |
|
cant remember........its been a long summer  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kick_ass1987
|
|
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 12:38:02 » |
|
So do you think Kingy is trying to say, the players 1-11 are his main players.... which leaves charlie comyn platt, and the chav out, and shakes just mises out.... or do you think its just a number..... because to be honest, his 1 - 11 is a very strong line up, and i wouldnt complain with that:
Rhys
Saun
Jack Smith
Nicky Nicolau
Jerel
Jenks
Gareth Whalley
Rory
Tony Thorpe
Stef and
Jamie Cureton
now thats not too bad
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:14:40 » |
|
How odd, they've switched Reeves and Roberts' numbers? Pook and Lapham have also been given proper squad numbers, possibly an indication of their increased involvement next season.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:16:26 » |
|
Is Marshy number 69 still? Do you think he'll get a start next season? Seemed to have gone off the boil last year, was impressive in the warm ups the season before last though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sonicyouth
Offline
Posts: 22352
|
|
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:17:17 » |
|
he wasn't there last season was he?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
janaage
People's Front of Alba
Offline
Posts: 14825
|
|
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:19:11 » |
|
Must have been long term injured.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kaufman
|
|
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:21:31 » |
|
someone said that roberts played with that number at bristol city so he prefers it !
if it makes him play better then fair enough!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
@MacPhlea
Offline
Posts: 2325
|
|
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:31:12 » |
|
14 is always jinxed (unless you're Thiery Henry of course) which is why Reeves has ow got it because he is unlikely to feature much next year
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ben Wah Balls
Offline
Posts: 5972
|
|
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:42:07 » |
|
Pook and Lapham have been given squad numbers because they've now signed professional contracts as first team players, last year they were on youth contracts. Caton, Holgate and Wells are still on youth contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
faringdingdong
Offline
Posts: 370
|
|
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 14:20:33 » |
|
Is Marshy number 69 still? Do you think he'll get a start next season? Seemed to have gone off the boil last year, was impressive in the warm ups the season before last though.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We wanna go somewhere else. We're not threatened by people anymore. All our insecurities have evaporated. We're in the clouds now. We're wide open. We're spacemen orbiting the earth. The world looks beautiful from here, man.
|
|
|
|
Spud
|
|
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 14:55:47 » |
|
14 is always jinxed (unless you're Thiery Henry of course) which is why Reeves has ow got it because he is unlikely to feature much next year Wooooo Hooooo!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 33899
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #14 on: Thursday, July 14, 2005, 10:22:30 » |
|
1. Evans
2. O'Hanlon
3. Smith
4. Nicolau
5. Ifil
6. Jenkins
7. Whalley
8. Fallon
9. Thorpe
10. Miglioranzi
11. Cureton
12. Shakes
13. Bulman
14. Reeves
15. Nicholas
16.
17. Platt
18. Roberts
19.
20.
Is that right? thats off the top of my head....what numbers have Pook & Lapham been given? I know Lapham had 5 last year and Pook 22?!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
