Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: squad numbers  (Read 3425 times)
CARTMAN

Offline Offline

Posts: 286




Ignore
« on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 11:51:55 »

3-jack smith
4-nicky nicolau
6-steve jenkins
7-gareth whalley
9-tony thorpe
11-jamie cureton
12-ricky shakes
17-charli comyn platt
the rest i think are the same as last year
Logged
Johno

Offline Offline

Posts: 5927




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 11:57:14 »

reeves is 14...roberts is 18...
Logged
Johno

Offline Offline

Posts: 5927




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 11:57:54 »

jenkins already was 6 wasn't he? ifil is now 5....
Logged
CARTMAN

Offline Offline

Posts: 286




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 12:09:22 »

cant remember........its been a long summer  Sad
Logged
kick_ass1987

« Reply #4 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 12:38:02 »

So do you think Kingy is trying to say, the players 1-11 are his main players.... which leaves charlie comyn platt, and the chav out, and shakes just mises out.... or do you think its just a number..... because to be honest, his 1 - 11 is a very strong line up, and i wouldnt complain with that:
Rhys
Saun
Jack Smith
Nicky Nicolau
Jerel
Jenks
Gareth Whalley
Rory
Tony Thorpe  
Stef    and
Jamie Cureton

 now thats not too bad
Logged
sonicyouth

Offline Offline

Posts: 22352





Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:14:40 »

How odd, they've switched Reeves and Roberts' numbers? Pook and Lapham have also been given proper squad numbers, possibly an indication of their increased involvement next season.
Logged
janaage
People's Front of Alba

Offline Offline

Posts: 14825





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:16:26 »

Is Marshy number 69 still?  Do you think he'll get a start next season?  Seemed to have gone off the boil last year, was impressive in the warm ups the season before last though.
Logged
sonicyouth

Offline Offline

Posts: 22352





Ignore
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:17:17 »

he wasn't there last season was he?
Logged
janaage
People's Front of Alba

Offline Offline

Posts: 14825





Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:19:11 »

Must have been long term injured.
Logged
kaufman

« Reply #9 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:21:31 »

someone said that roberts played with that number at bristol city so he prefers it !
if it makes him play better then fair enough!
Logged
@MacPhlea

Offline Offline

Posts: 2325





Ignore
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:31:12 »

14 is always jinxed (unless you're Thiery Henry of course) which is why Reeves has ow got it because he is unlikely to feature much next year
Logged
Ben Wah Balls

Offline Offline

Posts: 5972




Ignore
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 13:42:07 »

Pook and Lapham have been given squad numbers because they've now signed professional contracts as first team players, last year they were on youth contracts. Caton, Holgate and Wells are still on youth contracts.
Logged
faringdingdong

Offline Offline

Posts: 370





Ignore
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 14:20:33 »

Quote from: "janaage"
Is Marshy number 69 still?  Do you think he'll get a start next season?  Seemed to have gone off the boil last year, was impressive in the warm ups the season before last though.
Logged

We wanna go somewhere else. We're not threatened by people anymore. All our insecurities have evaporated. We're in the clouds now. We're wide open. We're spacemen orbiting the earth. The world looks beautiful from here, man.
Spud

« Reply #13 on: Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 14:55:47 »

Quote from: "triseros"
14 is always jinxed (unless you're Thiery Henry of course) which is why Reeves has ow got it because he is unlikely to feature much next year


Wooooo Hooooo!  
Logged
DV
Has also heard this

Online Online

Posts: 33899


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #14 on: Thursday, July 14, 2005, 10:22:30 »

1. Evans
2. O'Hanlon
3. Smith
4. Nicolau
5. Ifil
6. Jenkins
7. Whalley
8. Fallon
9. Thorpe
10. Miglioranzi
11. Cureton
12. Shakes
13. Bulman
14. Reeves
15. Nicholas
16.
17. Platt
18. Roberts
19.
20.

Is that right? thats off the top of my head....what numbers have Pook & Lapham been given? I know Lapham had 5 last year and Pook 22?!
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Print
Jump to: