jutty274
 Offline
Posts: 1863
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: Friday, May 13, 2011, 22:51:35 » |
|
Wife is very happy with her 40D,
I would also be happy with a wife with 40D. Sorry that was too good an oppotunity to pass up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #46 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 00:21:40 » |
|
So glad you did that. Been fighting against it all evening  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
|
« Reply #47 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 10:59:52 » |
|
I got a Nikon in the end, preferred the entry level ones to the canons.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
|
« Reply #48 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 11:02:01 » |
|
This was in among all the free stuff that came with it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
|
« Reply #49 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 19:31:06 » |
|
Whats the type of lens called that makes things look like they're in miniature. And I don't mean wide angle or zoom out or any shit like that, it does something with the perspective to make it look a bit wrong. Think they just used the effect on Eurovision.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55509
|
|
« Reply #50 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 20:18:11 » |
|
Whats the type of lens called that makes things look like they're in miniature. And I don't mean wide angle or zoom out or any shit like that, it does something with the perspective to make it look a bit wrong. Think they just used the effect on Eurovision.
Fisheye? Probably not, it does make things a bit wrong, not sure I'd describe it as miniature. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #51 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 20:30:51 » |
|
Whats the type of lens called that makes things look like they're in miniature.
A SiPie, and the extra tiny version is a Bushey |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
|
« Reply #52 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 20:31:41 » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27137
|
|
« Reply #53 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 20:34:29 » |
|
It was probably just a macro lense.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
axs
naaarrrrrppppp
Offline
Posts: 13469
|
|
« Reply #54 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 20:38:57 » |
|
It looks pretty cool, like a toy village or something. And can people stop spelling lens wih an e on the end? Thanks x
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Samdy Gray
Dirty sneaky traitor weasel
Offline
Posts: 27137
|
|
« Reply #55 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 20:41:04 » |
|
Sorry x
(It's the drink)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
|
« Reply #56 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 20:43:43 » |
|
It was probably just a macro lense.
Nope. Having read up some more it looks like the trick is to sharpen the area of focus and then blur the rest of it. Sure there was a name for the type of lens though. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dazzza
Offline
Posts: 8265
|
|
« Reply #57 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 20:52:31 » |
|
preferred the entry level ones to the canons.
A nice 32C for me to. More than a handfulls a waste eh? Are we still talking about breasts? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....
Offline
Posts: 6351
Fartmeister
|
|
« Reply #58 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 21:00:40 » |
|
Think they are called tilt shift lenses, not very common. You could create a similar effect with a Macro lens I guess. I would also be happy with a wife with 40D.
Sorry that was too good an oppotunity to pass up.
Good work, well spotted...... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Peter Venkman
We don't need no stinking badges.
Offline
Posts: 59527
Things can only get better
|
|
« Reply #59 on: Saturday, May 14, 2011, 21:15:28 » |
|
A nice 32C for me to. More than a handfulls a waste eh?
I say give me bigger fucking hands! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Only a fool does not know when to hold his tongue.
|
|
|
|
