|
BANGKOK RED
|
 |
« Reply #90 on: Saturday, May 7, 2011, 14:12:49 » |
|
I thought it was some clever statement about this thread that I couldn't understand.
Now I see it's just bears. Why not?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
 Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #91 on: Saturday, May 7, 2011, 14:13:39 » |
|
Dunno but it bears repeating.
Ha ha, that's superb! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nemo
Shit Bacon
 Online
Posts: 21547
|
|
« Reply #92 on: Saturday, May 7, 2011, 14:24:43 » |
|
£875k fine.
Well, that's going to raise eyebrows.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
|
« Reply #93 on: Saturday, May 7, 2011, 14:25:22 » |
|
Apparently QPR are being fined £875k. Considering promotion to the Prem is worth at least £90m guaranteed TV money even if they get relegated next season, that is not even a slap on the wrist.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tans
You spin me right round baby right round
Offline
Posts: 25285
|
|
« Reply #94 on: Saturday, May 7, 2011, 15:11:09 » |
|
Piss takig cunts
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ghanimah
Offline
Posts: 3639
|
|
« Reply #95 on: Saturday, May 7, 2011, 15:37:03 » |
|
Apparently they were cleared of supplying fake documentation. How can you charge someone with fake documentation unless there was evidence that they were fake?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"We perform the duties of freemen; we must have the privileges of freemen ..."
|
|
|
|
DMR
|
|
« Reply #96 on: Saturday, May 7, 2011, 21:02:25 » |
|
This is a genuine question, not a stir job.
They signed a player who had slightly iffy ownership issues?
Who ACTUALLY gives a fuck? Does it detract from the fact that they deservedly pissed the league? Did this one player make 20 points difference? Not me, no and no.
Some of you lot need to stop being so fucking bitter. Fair fucks to QPR.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BANGKOK RED
|
|
« Reply #97 on: Saturday, May 7, 2011, 21:13:11 » |
|
This is a genuine question, not a stir job.
They signed a player who had slightly iffy ownership issues?
Who ACTUALLY gives a fuck? Does it detract from the fact that they deservedly pissed the league? Did this one player make 20 points difference? Not me, no and no.
Some of you lot need to stop being so fucking bitter. Fair fucks to QPR.
Until the next time when an unlevel playing field affects you directly. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ghanimah
Offline
Posts: 3639
|
|
« Reply #98 on: Saturday, May 7, 2011, 21:32:03 » |
|
This is a genuine question, not a stir job.
They signed a player who had slightly iffy ownership issues?
Who ACTUALLY gives a fuck? Does it detract from the fact that they deservedly pissed the league? Did this one player make 20 points difference? Not me, no and no.
Some of you lot need to stop being so fucking bitter. Fair fucks to QPR.
League 2 has a wage cap, therefore according to your; "who ACTUALLY gives a fuck" logic regarding rule breaches, we can just disregard the rules, pay what we want, piss the league and tough shit to everyone else? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"We perform the duties of freemen; we must have the privileges of freemen ..."
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #99 on: Saturday, May 7, 2011, 21:41:41 » |
|
This is a genuine question, not a stir job.
They signed a player who had slightly iffy ownership issues?
Who ACTUALLY gives a fuck? Does it detract from the fact that they deservedly pissed the league? Did this one player make 20 points difference? Not me, no and no.
Some of you lot need to stop being so fucking bitter. Fair fucks to QPR.
Think you've missed the point - the anger is largely directed at the FA and their inept/unequal handling of it, not QPR. If they applied the same rules equally to everyone, then fair dos, but they don't. And they're a bunch of wankers. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pauld
Aaron Aardvark
Offline
Posts: 25436
Absolute Calamity!
|
|
« Reply #100 on: Sunday, May 8, 2011, 17:47:17 » |
|
£75 grand for payments to unlicensed agents. Luton got a 10 point deduction, part of the 30 point deduction that doomed them to dropping out of the League. Even with the massive 20 points they were docked by the League, (i.e. without that 10 point deduction) they'd have stayed up. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/q/qpr/9479410.stmOh, and no punishment at all for 3rd party ownership, the offence they admitted when they re-registered the player which is how the offence came to light The FA are a joke. One rule for the rich... |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Sunday, May 8, 2011, 17:50:55 by pauld »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
joteddyred
Offline
Posts: 4363
|
|
« Reply #101 on: Sunday, May 8, 2011, 17:56:03 » |
|
Nothing fails to surprise me where the FA are concerned, but this is an absolute disgrace.
Exactly as Paul says, one rule for one......
It will be interesting if any comment comes out from the Luton camp. They must be in meltdown over this.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
|
« Reply #102 on: Sunday, May 8, 2011, 18:02:04 » |
|
If it is that clear cut, ie that they were found guilty of the same or worse offence as Luton, then Swansea will take action.
The big question for me is just how independent the panel was, it appears there were two FA representatives on it which would suggest it isn't independent in the slightest. I don't know why they don't just appoint three QC's / judges / whatever, whose judgement couldn't be called in to question - which would make it very difficult for clubs with money to buy their way out.
The time scales really don't help either, but that is a problem across the board. Why does it take so long to process disciplinary cases, they should be able to have them done and dusted with 7 days of the offence.
Fact is though that the FA is just as bent and corrupt as FIFA.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55609
|
|
« Reply #103 on: Sunday, May 8, 2011, 18:23:08 » |
|
QPR were found guilty of breaking rule A1 and were find. A. GENERAL
1 A Player or Club must not at any time use the services of, or seek to use the
services of, pay, or seek to pay, either directly or indirectly, an Unauthorised Agent
in relation to any Agency Activity.
Where as Luton were deducted 10 points for breaching rule A1: A. GENERAL
1 A Player or Club must not at any time use the services of, or seek to use the
services of, pay, or seek to pay, either directly or indirectly, an Unauthorised Agent
in relation to any Agency Activity.
erm, er... |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Sunday, May 8, 2011, 18:26:25 by Batch »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Arriba
Offline
Posts: 21289
|
|
« Reply #104 on: Sunday, May 8, 2011, 18:30:15 » |
|
they bottled docking points as they left it too late.if they'd sorted this weeks ago they'd have stung qpr, i'm sure.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
