Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: the alleged reasons for the wearing of the white kit (yawn)  (Read 1794 times)
jimbob

Offline Offline

Posts: 1430





Ignore
« on: Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 21:49:12 »

may have been posted already but we were supposed to wear it against Charlton and EA Sports weren't happy, so we had to wear it at wembley... Doh

that is all as had read enough about paynter today.....
Logged
Barry Scott

Offline Offline

Posts: 9113




« Reply #1 on: Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 21:52:07 »

What's done is done. I think there's enough negative feeling kicking around at the moment with restarting the whole white kit debate. It's in the past and forgotten as far as i'm concerned.
Logged
donkey
Cheers!

Offline Offline

Posts: 7039


He headed a football.




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 22:06:26 »

may have been posted already but we were supposed to wear it against Charlton and EA Sports weren't happy, so we had to wear it at wembley... Doh

that is all as had read enough about paynter today.....

If that's true then EA Sports can fuck off.
Logged

donkey tells the truth

I headed the ball.

eeeeeeeeeeeeeee-aaaaaaaawwwwwww
jonny72

Offline Offline

Posts: 5554





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 22:12:22 »

My favourite explanation came from Fitton....

Quote
"It is a scientifically proven fact that your legs look like they are going faster when you run if you are wearing white socks"

Still trying to figure out if he (or the paper it was printed in) was on the wind up.
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32378


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 22:13:07 »

may have been posted already but we were supposed to wear it against Charlton and EA Sports weren't happy, so we had to wear it at wembley... Doh

that is all as had read enough about paynter today.....

Didnt we already know this last week?

They picked the blue, as they prefer it meaning EA didn't get a showing against Charlton. 3 games, 3 kits, 1 game in each kit.
Logged
Arriba

Offline Offline

Posts: 21289





Ignore
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 22:20:09 »

fans still got bullshitted though
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32378


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 07:18:16 »

True and if this was the case why didn't we wear a one off wembley special kit with ea on the front that was red?
Logged
Spy

Offline Offline

Posts: 2483





Ignore
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 08:48:52 »

True and if this was the case why didn't we wear a one off wembley special kit with ea on the front that was red?

Because that kit doesn't exist.
Logged
DiV
Has also heard this

Offline Offline

Posts: 32378


Joseph McLaughlin




Ignore
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 09:12:23 »

I'm sure Adidas have the facilites needed to manufacture new football shirts.
Logged
Spy

Offline Offline

Posts: 2483





Ignore
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 09:22:43 »

Yes obviously but it's hardly standard practise for a club to commision a new shirt for the manufacturers with less than 2 weeks notice.

I'm just not sure that suggestion is realistic. I don't think clubs would do that.
Logged
The_Plagiarist

« Reply #10 on: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 12:32:49 »

we managed it with all those wembley 10 shirts, as well as the adidas black wembley polo shirts

why not a RED shirt for the RED army?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: