Crozzer
 Offline
Posts: 2487
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:35:50 » |
|
Kennedy didnt travel
Must have heard wrong on RS. Who's the back-up for JFl. Hasney on crutches? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32394
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #46 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:37:48 » |
|
So why put Austin on the bench if we have no plan to use him. Seems like a waste of a sub to me?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Crozzer
Offline
Posts: 2487
|
|
« Reply #47 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:38:37 » |
|
So why put Austin on the bench if we have no plan to use him. Seems like a waste of a sub to me?
Can't argue with that, are RS making it up? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:42:45 by Crozzer »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Only Me
Offline
Posts: 1202
|
|
« Reply #48 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:42:36 » |
|
So why put Austin on the bench if we have no plan to use him. Seems like a waste of a sub to me?
I assume he meant to say unlikely to play because, as you say, why take him if you know you won't use him. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Crozzer
Offline
Posts: 2487
|
|
« Reply #49 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:45:32 » |
|
RS just said he's on the bench nothing more, could have spin from the cometary team.
The question being discussed is whether Tope plays up front with Revell or plays in midfield, 4:4:2 or 4:5:1?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Only Me
Offline
Posts: 1202
|
|
« Reply #50 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:47:15 » |
|
Tope has to play up front
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Batch
Not a Batch
Offline
Posts: 55563
|
|
« Reply #51 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:47:30 » |
|
I reckon it'll be 4-5-1 myself.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32394
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #52 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:47:44 » |
|
I think it will be 4-5-1 .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BelfastRobin
Offline
Posts: 223
|
|
« Reply #53 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:49:25 » |
|
They play a 4-3-2 usually and then let Hoolahan run about in a free role, so I suspect we will play a 4-5-1 to counter their midfield trio, though I'm amazed we haven't gone with pace up front to counter their slow centre-backs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Eric Sabin - the new Thierry Henry"
|
|
|
Crozzer
Offline
Posts: 2487
|
|
« Reply #54 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:49:35 » |
|
Anyone know an anagram of Cureton?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36319
|
|
« Reply #55 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:51:27 » |
|
The 4-5-1 has worked away from home.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DiV
Has also heard this
Offline
Posts: 32394
Joseph McLaughlin
|
|
« Reply #56 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:51:40 » |
|
CUNTERO
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Simon Pieman
Original Wanker
Offline
Posts: 36319
|
|
« Reply #57 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:52:10 » |
|
Dan in Corsham = Freddie's Ferret?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
walrus
Offline
Posts: 4228
|
|
« Reply #58 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:54:04 » |
|
I hope it'll be 4-5-1.... today's pretty crucial if we want to seriously flirt with the playoffs, but can't really seeing us get anything after last week.
Fuck it, keep the faith, Gordon Greer's gunna back two in a 5-2 win for the Town, ala when we played Stockport away a few years ago - even Sabin managed to score that day...
Belfast - If they play 4-3-2 we're laughing...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Crozzer
Offline
Posts: 2487
|
|
« Reply #59 on: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 13:54:46 » |
|
CUNTERO
I came up with something similar Ore Cunt, but True Con seems to fit. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
