Mexicano Rojo
Offline
Posts: 11974
Demasiado no es demasiado
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:30:01 » |
|
that wasnt very good was it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:30:35 » |
|
We virtually need 3 5-1's to do this now...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:31:02 » |
|
What a load of bollocks. Surely they shouldn't allow the tactical ride in the play-offs?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:32:30 » |
|
What a load of bollocks. Surely they shouldn't allow the tactical ride in the play-offs?
We had our tacticalsin the 1st leg but fucked them up...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:33:11 » |
|
We had our tacticalsin the 1st leg but fucked them up...
I know but that's not the point. It makes sense in the league but it kind of spoils the play-offs a bit. It's like saying the next goal counts as 2 if you're 3 nil down.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:34:28 » |
|
I know but that's not the point. It makes sense in the league but it kind of spoils the play-offs a bit. It's like saying the next goal counts as 2 if you're 3 nil down.
Fully agree on that...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nevillew
Tripping the light puntastic
Offline
Posts: 4156
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:36:55 » |
|
But it was ok that Swindon had a points advantage in the play off semi final though.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Paolo Di Canio, it's Paolo Di Canio
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:38:10 » |
|
But it was ok that Swindon had a points advantage in the play off semi final though.
But that was due to 'winning' the league...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ginginho
Offline
Posts: 6997
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:39:05 » |
|
Oooh exciting!! What happens now!?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:39:14 » |
|
Ouchee...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:40:29 » |
|
Oooh exciting!! What happens now!?
The ref decides if anyone needs excluding.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
timmyg
Offline
Posts: 614
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:44:38 » |
|
That's a load of balls! No contact from the bikes and a little brush on the calf by the Swindon foot, caused by the Wolves guy locking his steering!
|
|
|
Logged
|
never trust a nun...
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:48:54 » |
|
Same old Wolves...always cheating
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Iffy's Onion Bhaji
petulant
Offline
Posts: 15863
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:49:39 » |
|
Refs don't like Swindon do they?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Summerof69
Offline
Posts: 8598
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: Monday, October 12, 2009, 21:50:41 » |
|
Refs don't like Swindon do they?
Nope.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|