Ironside
Wir müssen die Liberalen ausrotten
Offline
Posts: 1475
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 11:03:55 » |
|
What if you had tax deducted at source on it Genf ?
MP's expenses are tax exempt.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Genius, Gentleman Explorer, French Cabaret Chantoose and Small Bets Placed and someone who knows who they are changed my signature but its only know that I can be arsed to change it....and I mean all the spelling mistakes.
Was it me? It can't have been an interesting enough event for me to remember - fB.
|
|
|
genf_stfc
Offline
Posts: 1272
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 11:04:32 » |
|
Quote from: Fred Elliot on Today at 12:55:04 What if you had tax deducted at source on it Genf ?
then i don't see a problem with it, its a taxable part of your pay - doesn't matter if they call it a 'car allowance' or a 'special brew, tabs and porn fund'. but i'd be surprised that the employer didn't ask for receipts - it might turn out that that changes when all this is over. i assume you aren't paid from the public purse either.
i have no problem with mps claiming expenses to stay in london when at parliament or travelling there, but waht i do have a problem with is them pretending they live in a room with their sister whilst claiming mortgage payments on a mansion elsewhere. or getting expenses to do up a house, then flog it on at a profit before moving on smewhere else - and evading tax on that by pretending its their primary residence to HMRC, but their second home to parliament.
MPs get a decent wack too about 70grand i thought - its not like they are struggling through on 20k a year. if they didn't like those terms they should fuck off, frankly and get a job in the real world.
|
|
« Last Edit: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 11:06:49 by genf_stfc »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 11:09:16 » |
|
MP's expenses are tax exempt.
Expenses yes Car allowances as part of your remuneration package no
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 11:13:47 » |
|
Quote from: Fred Elliot on Today at 12:55:04 What if you had tax deducted at source on it Genf ?
then i don't see a problem with it, its a taxable part of your pay - doesn't matter if they call it a 'car allowance' or a 'special brew, tabs and porn fund'. but i'd be surprised that the employer didn't ask for receipts - it might turn out that that changes when all this is over. i assume you aren't paid from the public purse either.
Its an allowance as part of my remuneration package and albeit not from the public purse, we still have shareholders that we have to account to. The main part of my analagy is that I would suspect to a man, that if we all answered honestly, we would all accept the payment as its legal,and rightly or wrongly we are entitled to it. The rules that state that it is right are a different matter
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bogus Dave
Ate my own dick
Offline
Posts: 16467
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 11:25:29 » |
|
I don't know nearly enough to make a proper comment, but surely those benefiting are those that make the rules in the first place?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things get better but they never get good
|
|
|
Ironside
Wir müssen die Liberalen ausrotten
Offline
Posts: 1475
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 11:27:19 » |
|
Expenses yes
Car allowances as part of your remuneration package no
So what exactly is your point then? These "honourable" gentlemen are milking the system of expenses and allowances for every last penny they can get out of it, while exempting themselves from the burdens of the tax system you and I are subjected to, while simultaneously putting there hand in your pocket and taking your hard earned. Do you not see anything that is morally wrong here?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Genius, Gentleman Explorer, French Cabaret Chantoose and Small Bets Placed and someone who knows who they are changed my signature but its only know that I can be arsed to change it....and I mean all the spelling mistakes.
Was it me? It can't have been an interesting enough event for me to remember - fB.
|
|
|
Ironside
Wir müssen die Liberalen ausrotten
Offline
Posts: 1475
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 11:29:09 » |
|
Its an allowance as part of my remuneration package and albeit not from the public purse, we still have shareholders that we have to account to.
The main part of my analagy is that I would suspect to a man, that if we all answered honestly, we would all accept the payment as its legal,and rightly or wrongly we are entitled to it.
The rules that state that it is right are a different matter
I see, you're doing a "Cameron" as in not criticising this lot because you know you've got your hands in the till yourself. Fred's on the make. Shame on you.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Genius, Gentleman Explorer, French Cabaret Chantoose and Small Bets Placed and someone who knows who they are changed my signature but its only know that I can be arsed to change it....and I mean all the spelling mistakes.
Was it me? It can't have been an interesting enough event for me to remember - fB.
|
|
|
herthab
TEF Travel
Offline
Posts: 12020
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 11:30:26 » |
|
We're all on the make.
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's All Good..............
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 11:33:51 » |
|
I see, you're doing a "Cameron" as in not criticising this lot because you know you've got your hands in the till yourself.
Fred's on the make.
Shame on you.
Not on the make at all My contract of employment states that I am entitled to it so why shouldn't I claim it ? Like I said, whether my contract is morally wrong is another issue
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Fred Elliot
I REST MY FUCKING CASE
Offline
Posts: 15736
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 11:44:06 » |
|
So what exactly is your point then?
These "honourable" gentlemen are milking the system of expenses and allowances for every last penny they can get out of it, while exempting themselves from the burdens of the tax system you and I are subjected to, while simultaneously putting there hand in your pocket and taking your hard earned.
Do you not see anything that is morally wrong here?
I think I clearly stated my point 2 post previous to yours Ironside, oh great whiter than white one
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jonny72
Offline
Posts: 5554
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 12:08:00 » |
|
The big difference with MP's is that they should be setting an example for the rest of the population, rather than abusing the system which they themselves put in place. They don't just claim for reasonable expenses, most claim every single penny they want and take it for as much as possible.
There is a very simple solution though. Provide shared housing near Parliament, a few blocks of apartments would do the trick, where they can stay when they need to with everything provided and then give them all a rail pass.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
leefer
Offline
Posts: 12851
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 12:19:41 » |
|
The simple solution would be to increase the salary abit...and have NO expenses..end of any contoversy.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
genf_stfc
Offline
Posts: 1272
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 12:45:42 » |
|
Its an allowance as part of my remuneration package and albeit not from the public purse, we still have shareholders that we have to account to.
and if your shareholders decided the car allowance was inappropriate, i'm sure they would put a stop to it - they haven't, and the fact its part of your salary and you pay tax on it too, means you can do waht you want with it anyway - I wasn't accusing you of being on the make ! however, i, as a stakeholder i suppose the term is now, taxpayer, am saying the mps use of their expenses and allowances is wholly inappropriate - it may be a necessary part of the job, but they've abused it, profited from it and in some case seem to have been involved in fraud, tax evasion and all sorts.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
THE FLASH
Offline
Posts: 9610
Quick as a Flash!
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 12:54:21 » |
|
If MP's are following the rules and still taking the piss then the rules are wrong.
My missus got the Daily Mail yesterday ..........you would think its only Labour that take the piss out of expenses!! Right wing arse rag!
The truth is ....the rules are wrong and all the parties take the piss!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Clems Army!
|
|
|
donkey
Cheers!
Offline
Posts: 7104
He headed a football.
|
 |
« Reply #44 on: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 18:16:55 » |
|
My contract of employment states that I am entitled to it so why shouldn't I claim it ?
Like I said, whether my contract is morally wrong is another issue And this is the issue that MPs have failed to grasp (generally). They seem to think that by breaking no law they've done no wrong. It doesn't work that way. Good work, Fred, you understand this point.
|
|
|
Logged
|
donkey tells the truth
I headed the ball. eeeeeeeeeeeeeee-aaaaaaaawwwwwww
|
|
|
|