Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Jeremy Clarkson  (Read 8627 times)
Bennett
No Comment

Offline Offline

Posts: 9745





Ignore
« Reply #75 on: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 23:16:54 »

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value=" "></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src=" " type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Logged

This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
Bennett
No Comment

Offline Offline

Posts: 9745





Ignore
« Reply #76 on: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 23:17:09 »

oh god that went badly
Logged

This is the water.
And this is the well.
Drink full and descend.
The horse is the white of the eyes and dark within.
Bushey Boy

Offline Offline

Posts: 8351





Ignore
« Reply #77 on: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 23:24:44 »

You went to school, now you pay for the next person to do so.


Well said young man
Logged

Lumps

« Reply #78 on: Monday, February 9, 2009, 09:00:21 »

When the BBC pay a talentless twat like Ross £6m a year to fawn over superstarts while abusing innocent parties then they're always going to be open to challenge.

Er....they don't.

Certain elements of he media have determindly presented this contract as the salary that Ross is paid each year despite the BBC clarifying the position on at least 3 occasions that I can remember. From what's been said the £6m is what is paid to Ross's production company / companies to provide the TV and radio shows that he makes for the BBC. That's obviously a bit different from that being his salary.

When getting all worked up about issues like this I think everyone needs to take a deep breath and think about who's whipping the frenzy up and why.

No fucker gave a shit about what Ross and Brand said on Manuel's answer phone for a week or so after broadcast, apart from Manuel and his family. But then the papers picked up on it and fucking madness ensued.

Similarly no-one would have given a shit, or even known, about Clarkson spouting off somewhere on the other side of the world, without the papers deciding it was a story.

And why is it a story. Are tabloid newspaper editors suddenly sensitive souls desperate to avoid giving offence to minority groups? Of course not.

The truth virtually the entire of the privately owned media detests the BBC and wants to see it destroyed. If you're all happy with a future in which all TV is of the quality churned out by ITV or dominated by constantly cycled US imports and the likes of Ibiza Uncovered on Sky then that's not a problem.

But the thought of British TV without the BBC depresses the fucking life out of me.
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #79 on: Monday, February 9, 2009, 15:36:21 »

Well said Lumps. More succintly: FA Cup 4th round replay, Liverpool v Everton.
Logged
chalkies_shorts

« Reply #80 on: Monday, February 9, 2009, 16:15:33 »

So do you think he and Brand had the right to do what they did? The medium they used and the number of listeners is irrelevant. What they actually said is on public record and not disputed.
Logged
pauld
Aaron Aardvark

Offline Offline

Posts: 25436


Absolute Calamity!




Ignore
« Reply #81 on: Monday, February 9, 2009, 16:21:17 »

My reply was more to Lumps' general point about the attempt to use a few non-issues with some overpaid twats spouting off to pursue a general vendetta against public service broadcasting
Logged
Lumps

« Reply #82 on: Monday, February 9, 2009, 16:42:40 »

So do you think he and Brand had the right to do what they did? The medium they used and the number of listeners is irrelevant. What they actually said is on public record and not disputed.

Do you even know what actually went on? Or are you one of the several million readers of the tabloid press that still believe that they phoned this bloke as some sort of practical joke?

I'm fucking sick of people describing this as a "prank call". It was a prearranged interview that Sacks decided to back out of at the last minute leaving two radio presenters hanging talking to a fucking answerphone. I've spouted some really embarrassing bollocks when confronted with an answerphone unexpectedly, and I've never been trying to make a radio show. Yes they then wound each other up so that every attempt they made to phone and apologise was turned into something even more embarrassing, but that's because they're a pair of overgrown kids.

Sacks himself didn't seem that bothered by the whole affair. Fuck knows why the likes of you were so wound up about it.
Logged
THE FLASH

Offline Offline

Posts: 9609


Quick as a Flash!




Ignore
« Reply #83 on: Monday, February 9, 2009, 16:57:10 »

Do you even know what actually went on? Or are you one of the several million readers of the tabloid press that still believe that they phoned this bloke as some sort of practical joke?

I'm fucking sick of people describing this as a "prank call". It was a prearranged interview that Sacks decided to back out of at the last minute leaving two radio presenters hanging talking to a fucking answerphone. I've spouted some really embarrassing bollocks when confronted with an answerphone unexpectedly, and I've never been trying to make a radio show. Yes they then wound each other up so that every attempt they made to phone and apologise was turned into something even more embarrassing, but that's because they're a pair of overgrown kids.

Sacks himself didn't seem that bothered by the whole affair. Fuck knows why the likes of you were so wound up about it.

Witch hunt by the Mail and Express........didnt seem to make too much of a fuss with Prince Harrys comments!!?Huh?
Logged

Clems Army!
Ardiles

Offline Offline

Posts: 11588


Stirlingshire Reds




Ignore
« Reply #84 on: Monday, February 9, 2009, 16:59:41 »

But the thought of British TV without the BBC depresses the fucking life out of me.

I can promise you you're not alone there.
Logged
herthab
TEF Travel

Offline Offline

Posts: 12020





Ignore
« Reply #85 on: Monday, February 9, 2009, 19:17:02 »

Fuck clarkson, fuck ross, fuck brand and fuck the BBC, the daily mail, itv and the news of the world.
Logged

It's All Good..............
pumbaa
Ha, no cunt in my title anymore. Oh.....

Offline Offline

Posts: 6351


Fartmeister




Ignore
« Reply #86 on: Monday, February 9, 2009, 19:32:33 »

Fuck clarkson, fuck ross, fuck brand and fuck the BBC, the daily mail, itv and the news of the world.

That's a whole lot of fucking. Can you cope at your age?
Logged
chalkies_shorts

« Reply #87 on: Monday, February 9, 2009, 19:49:55 »

Do you even know what actually went on? Or are you one of the several million readers of the tabloid press that still believe that they phoned this bloke as some sort of practical joke?

I'm fucking sick of people describing this as a "prank call". It was a prearranged interview that Sacks decided to back out of at the last minute leaving two radio presenters hanging talking to a fucking answerphone. I've spouted some really embarrassing bollocks when confronted with an answerphone unexpectedly, and I've never been trying to make a radio show. Yes they then wound each other up so that every attempt they made to phone and apologise was turned into something even more embarrassing, but that's because they're a pair of overgrown kids.

Sacks himself didn't seem that bothered by the whole affair. Fuck knows why the likes of you were so wound up about it.
So was the pre arranged interview about Brand shagging his grand daughter. If so then fair enough Sachs has left himself open. If not then its a different matter.
I repeat my earlier question. Do you think they were right to do it?
 
Logged
oxford_fan

Offline Offline

Posts: 6764





Ignore
« Reply #88 on: Monday, February 9, 2009, 20:24:41 »

that wasn't your earlier question.

So do you think he and Brand had the right to do what they did?

Do you think they were right to do it?
 

different questions.
Logged
chalkies_shorts

« Reply #89 on: Monday, February 9, 2009, 20:36:41 »

Good point but I'll take an answer to either or both. I'm just a bit intrigued by Lumps comments.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: